Don White wrote:

JimH 1919-2005
Tragically flushed down the toilet.
Dissolve In Peace

*****************

That's probably the right solution.

Ignoring him means that only one person is acting like a ridiculous
asshole, but responding runs the risk of stooping to his level and
suddenly creating a second.

Another dry drunk, (reformed flamer), falls off the wagon and back into
the dungheap.
No surpise.

wrote in message
oups.com...
Don White wrote:

JimH 1919-2005
Tragically flushed down the toilet.
Dissolve In Peace

*****************

That's probably the right solution.

Ignoring him means that only one person is acting like a ridiculous
asshole, but responding runs the risk of stooping to his level and
suddenly creating a second.

Another dry drunk, (reformed flamer), falls off the wagon and back into
the dungheap.
No surpise.

Ridiculous asshole ..... aren't you being a little hard on yourself?

Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Don White wrote:

JimH 1919-2005
Tragically flushed down the toilet.
Dissolve In Peace

*****************

That's probably the right solution.

Ignoring him means that only one person is acting like a ridiculous
asshole, but responding runs the risk of stooping to his level and
suddenly creating a second.

Another dry drunk, (reformed flamer), falls off the wagon and back
into
the dungheap.
No surpise.

Ridiculous asshole ..... aren't you being a little hard on
yourself?

I knew the right wingers here couldn't stop name calling. It's all they
have. How low can you go?

Are you calling Gould a right winger?

I know you aren't talking to me because I didn't call Gould anything, I was
asking him why HE thought he was a Ridiculous Asshole. In case you didn't
read the message above mine, Gould called JimH (and anyone who responds to
him) "a ridiculous asshole". Now that I think about it, Gould called you a
ridiculous asshole.

The only point of my post was I thought Gould was being a little hard on
himself. Do you disagree with me?


wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Don White wrote:

JimH 1919-2005
Tragically flushed down the toilet.
Dissolve In Peace

*****************

That's probably the right solution.

Ignoring him means that only one person is acting like a ridiculous
asshole, but responding runs the risk of stooping to his level and
suddenly creating a second.

Another dry drunk, (reformed flamer), falls off the wagon and back
into
the dungheap.
No surpise.

Ridiculous asshole ..... aren't you being a little hard on
yourself?

I knew the right wingers here couldn't stop name calling. It's all they
have. How low can you go?

Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote:
Are you calling Gould a right winger?

The old gray matter isn't working well for you today, is it?

I know you aren't talking to me because I didn't call Gould anything, I was
asking him why HE thought he was a Ridiculous Asshole. In case you didn't
read the message above mine, Gould called JimH (and anyone who responds to
him) "a ridiculous asshole". Now that I think about it, Gould called you a
ridiculous asshole.



wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote:
Are you calling Gould a right winger?

The old gray matter isn't working well for you today, is it?

Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote:
I know you aren't talking to me because I didn't call Gould
anything, I was
asking him why HE thought he was a Ridiculous Asshole. In case you
didn't
read the message above mine, Gould called JimH (and anyone who
responds to
him) "a ridiculous asshole". Now that I think about it, Gould called
you a
ridiculous asshole.


Like I said, I don't think your gray matter is up to snuff today. We'll
try one more time, just for you.....
perhaps you need to go back a little farther in time than the post you
are blabbing about above........easy now, don't want you to implode
thinking too hard.

"Dr. Dr. John Smith" wrote in message
...
I know you aren't talking to me because I didn't call Gould anything, I
was
asking him why HE thought he was a Ridiculous Asshole. In case you didn't
read the message above mine, Gould called JimH (and anyone who responds to
him) "a ridiculous asshole". Now that I think about it, Gould called you
a
ridiculous asshole.

If the shoe fits................................ :-)




wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote:
Are you calling Gould a right winger?

The old gray matter isn't working well for you today, is it?

wrote in message
oups.com...



That's probably the right solution.


You just can't stand being challenged on your views or your subsequent
spins, now can you.

Killfile me for all I care. It will show I was correct in my assumption.

JimH wrote:


You just can't stand being challenged on your views or your subsequent
spins, now can you.

Killfile me for all I care. It will show I was correct in my
assumption.

***********

Can't stand being challenged on my views? I'll discuss *issues* with
anybody capable of understanging abstract thought and who can carry on
a debate without immediately resorting to personal remark.....(even
*opening* with one, as happened in this thread).

The kindest compliment I get in a day is to learn that people with
perspectives, philosophies, (and lives organized as yours seems to be),
disagree with my opinions and despise me as an individual.

Your assumption, like others, makes an ASS of U and ME.
The last time you were correct was when you apologized to the NG for
expressing the exact same behavior you have now resumed.