wrote in message
oups.com...
gould types have no lower threshold, anything goes.

*********

Well that's a fact. You know how much of a low life piece of crap I
*could be*?

I could pick a single line, out of context, in a several paragraph
expression of regret that a local policeman died in the line of duty. I
could pick a line that noted that staffing seems to have been cut back
on the patrol boats, and a line that wondered whether anti-tax
sentiments had forced a reduction in personnel.

Then, if I were truly a pig headed, futher mucking, ignorant piece of
useless humanity rattling down a junkpile of discarded intellects, I
would use that line, extracted out of context, read meanings into it
that were never stated or intended, and accuse the writer of trying to
politicize a tragedy.

Then, if I were *even lower* than a pig headed, futher mucking,
ignorant piece of useless humanity rattling down a junkpile of
discarded intellects, I would "pile on".

You're absolutely right Wally, there's no limit to how low I could go.
If I go low enough, I'll find some people like I just described, I'm
sure.


Sing to the music of "Turn, turn, turn" by the Byrds
=========================
With every post, I...spin...spin...spin...

There is no reason, but I ....spin...spin....spin

And I hope my spins will be believed and not disputed

A time to lie, a time to deny
A time to spin, a time to grin
A time for truth, never since my youth
A time to laugh, a time to weep

All based on my spins. spins, spins

With every post, I......
=====================================
Enjoy.

"JimH" wrote in message
...

=========================
With every post, I...spin...spin...spin...

There is no reason, but I ....spin...spin....spin

And I hope my spins will be believed and not disputed

A time to lie, a time to deny
A time to spin, a time to grin
snip


JimH 1919-2005
Tragically flushed down the toilet.
Dissolve In Peace

Don White wrote:

JimH 1919-2005
Tragically flushed down the toilet.
Dissolve In Peace

*****************

That's probably the right solution.

Ignoring him means that only one person is acting like a ridiculous
asshole, but responding runs the risk of stooping to his level and
suddenly creating a second.

Another dry drunk, (reformed flamer), falls off the wagon and back into
the dungheap.
No surpise.

wrote in message
oups.com...
Don White wrote:

JimH 1919-2005
Tragically flushed down the toilet.
Dissolve In Peace

*****************

That's probably the right solution.

Ignoring him means that only one person is acting like a ridiculous
asshole, but responding runs the risk of stooping to his level and
suddenly creating a second.

Another dry drunk, (reformed flamer), falls off the wagon and back into
the dungheap.
No surpise.

Ridiculous asshole ..... aren't you being a little hard on yourself?

Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Don White wrote:

JimH 1919-2005
Tragically flushed down the toilet.
Dissolve In Peace

*****************

That's probably the right solution.

Ignoring him means that only one person is acting like a ridiculous
asshole, but responding runs the risk of stooping to his level and
suddenly creating a second.

Another dry drunk, (reformed flamer), falls off the wagon and back
into
the dungheap.
No surpise.

Ridiculous asshole ..... aren't you being a little hard on
yourself?

I knew the right wingers here couldn't stop name calling. It's all they
have. How low can you go?

Are you calling Gould a right winger?

I know you aren't talking to me because I didn't call Gould anything, I was
asking him why HE thought he was a Ridiculous Asshole. In case you didn't
read the message above mine, Gould called JimH (and anyone who responds to
him) "a ridiculous asshole". Now that I think about it, Gould called you a
ridiculous asshole.

The only point of my post was I thought Gould was being a little hard on
himself. Do you disagree with me?


wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Don White wrote:

JimH 1919-2005
Tragically flushed down the toilet.
Dissolve In Peace

*****************

That's probably the right solution.

Ignoring him means that only one person is acting like a ridiculous
asshole, but responding runs the risk of stooping to his level and
suddenly creating a second.

Another dry drunk, (reformed flamer), falls off the wagon and back
into
the dungheap.
No surpise.

Ridiculous asshole ..... aren't you being a little hard on
yourself?

I knew the right wingers here couldn't stop name calling. It's all they
have. How low can you go?

Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote:
Are you calling Gould a right winger?

The old gray matter isn't working well for you today, is it?

wrote in message
oups.com...



That's probably the right solution.


You just can't stand being challenged on your views or your subsequent
spins, now can you.

Killfile me for all I care. It will show I was correct in my assumption.

JimH wrote:


You just can't stand being challenged on your views or your subsequent
spins, now can you.

Killfile me for all I care. It will show I was correct in my
assumption.

***********

Can't stand being challenged on my views? I'll discuss *issues* with
anybody capable of understanging abstract thought and who can carry on
a debate without immediately resorting to personal remark.....(even
*opening* with one, as happened in this thread).

The kindest compliment I get in a day is to learn that people with
perspectives, philosophies, (and lives organized as yours seems to be),
disagree with my opinions and despise me as an individual.

Your assumption, like others, makes an ASS of U and ME.
The last time you were correct was when you apologized to the NG for
expressing the exact same behavior you have now resumed.

wrote in message
oups.com...
That's probably the right solution.

Ignoring him means that only one person is acting like a ridiculous
asshole, but responding runs the risk of stooping to his level and
suddenly creating a second.

Another dry drunk, (reformed flamer), falls off the wagon and back into
the dungheap.
No surpise.


Sometimes you just have to do what's necessary. When you have a little
yappy dog nipping at your heels, your first inclination to kick it away.
Poor Jimh doesn't have the sense to slink away after repeated bootings.
What do you do??