John H wrote:
On 17 Mar 2005 10:32:47 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 17 Mar 2005 09:32:06 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 17 Mar 2005 08:35:46 -0800, wrote:


People who are always automatically so anti-tax ...

Gee, who would these be Chuck? Surely you're not referring to
one
political
group are you?

The only group would be, "People who are always automatically so
anti-tax" If the shoe fits......

An even more interesting question might be, "How does a
properly
fitted and
fastened life vest go floating away?"

How do you know it was "properly fitted and fastened", John?

That *is* the question, isn't it???

[Thanks!]

No, John, please learn to comprehend what you, yourself has asked.
You
asked HOW DOES a properly fitted and fastened......

You didn't ask IF is was properly fitted and fastened, etc. By the
way,
sliding down jagged rip-rap rocks could certainly rip a properly
fitted
and fastened life vest from a person, allowing it to "go floating
away".

'Rip rap rocks?' From whence came that? Have you been there and seen
the canal?
--
John H

Perhaps from the news story, also?
"But detectives say Lone's partner couldn't see him when Lone
apparently
slipped on the rocks"

Are you calling Gould a right winger?

I know you aren't talking to me because I didn't call Gould anything, I was
asking him why HE thought he was a Ridiculous Asshole. In case you didn't
read the message above mine, Gould called JimH (and anyone who responds to
him) "a ridiculous asshole". Now that I think about it, Gould called you a
ridiculous asshole.

The only point of my post was I thought Gould was being a little hard on
himself. Do you disagree with me?


wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Don White wrote:

JimH 1919-2005
Tragically flushed down the toilet.
Dissolve In Peace

*****************

That's probably the right solution.

Ignoring him means that only one person is acting like a ridiculous
asshole, but responding runs the risk of stooping to his level and
suddenly creating a second.

Another dry drunk, (reformed flamer), falls off the wagon and back
into
the dungheap.
No surpise.

Ridiculous asshole ..... aren't you being a little hard on
yourself?

I knew the right wingers here couldn't stop name calling. It's all they
have. How low can you go?

wrote in message
oups.com...
That's probably the right solution.

Ignoring him means that only one person is acting like a ridiculous
asshole, but responding runs the risk of stooping to his level and
suddenly creating a second.

Another dry drunk, (reformed flamer), falls off the wagon and back into
the dungheap.
No surpise.


Sometimes you just have to do what's necessary. When you have a little
yappy dog nipping at your heels, your first inclination to kick it away.
Poor Jimh doesn't have the sense to slink away after repeated bootings.
What do you do??

JimH wrote:


You just can't stand being challenged on your views or your subsequent
spins, now can you.

Killfile me for all I care. It will show I was correct in my
assumption.

***********

Can't stand being challenged on my views? I'll discuss *issues* with
anybody capable of understanging abstract thought and who can carry on
a debate without immediately resorting to personal remark.....(even
*opening* with one, as happened in this thread).

The kindest compliment I get in a day is to learn that people with
perspectives, philosophies, (and lives organized as yours seems to be),
disagree with my opinions and despise me as an individual.

Your assumption, like others, makes an ASS of U and ME.
The last time you were correct was when you apologized to the NG for
expressing the exact same behavior you have now resumed.

For someone who "killfiled" JimH, you sure seem obsessed by him. You
respond to everyone one of his posts with an insult.




"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
wrote:
JimH wrote:


You just can't stand being challenged on your views or your subsequent
spins, now can you.

Killfile me for all I care. It will show I was correct in my
assumption.

***********

Can't stand being challenged on my views? I'll discuss *issues* with
anybody capable of understanging abstract thought and who can carry on
a debate without immediately resorting to personal remark.....(even
*opening* with one, as happened in this thread).

The kindest compliment I get in a day is to learn that people with
perspectives, philosophies, (and lives organized as yours seems to be),
disagree with my opinions and despise me as an individual.

Your assumption, like others, makes an ASS of U and ME.
The last time you were correct was when you apologized to the NG for
expressing the exact same behavior you have now resumed.


Hertvik said:

"Killfile me for all I care. It will show I was correct in my
assumption."


Gotta love that kind of simplemindedness.

Here's a nint for you, Hertvik:

I klllfiled you not because of your opinions, and not because of your
politics, but because your brain operates at rotifer-like levels, and you
spend most of your time in here drooling on the leavings of other posters.

Frankly, you were funnier, Hertvik, when you posted here as your son Jeff.

"Dr. Dr. John Smith" wrote in message
...
For someone who "killfiled" JimH, you sure seem obsessed by him. You
respond to everyone one of his posts with an insult.




And I don't even have a son named Jeff. LOL!

Krause is indeed infatuated with me. He has stalked me and my wife, posted
our address here in this NG and made personal threats to us. He is a sick
man.

Gould is starting to act the same. He has to insult me every time he
responds to one of my posts. I thought he was above that but I guess not.

Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote:
Are you calling Gould a right winger?

The old gray matter isn't working well for you today, is it?

I know you aren't talking to me because I didn't call Gould anything, I was
asking him why HE thought he was a Ridiculous Asshole. In case you didn't
read the message above mine, Gould called JimH (and anyone who responds to
him) "a ridiculous asshole". Now that I think about it, Gould called you a
ridiculous asshole.



wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote:
Are you calling Gould a right winger?

The old gray matter isn't working well for you today, is it?

Dr. Dr. John Smith wrote:
I know you aren't talking to me because I didn't call Gould
anything, I was
asking him why HE thought he was a Ridiculous Asshole. In case you
didn't
read the message above mine, Gould called JimH (and anyone who
responds to
him) "a ridiculous asshole". Now that I think about it, Gould called
you a
ridiculous asshole.


Like I said, I don't think your gray matter is up to snuff today. We'll
try one more time, just for you.....
perhaps you need to go back a little farther in time than the post you
are blabbing about above........easy now, don't want you to implode
thinking too hard.

"Dr. Dr. John Smith" wrote in message news:...

wrote in message
oups.com...
Don White wrote:

JimH 1919-2005
Tragically flushed down the toilet.
Dissolve In Peace

*****************

That's probably the right solution.

Ignoring him means that only one person is acting like a ridiculous
asshole, but responding runs the risk of stooping to his level and
suddenly creating a second.

Another dry drunk, (reformed flamer), falls off the wagon and back into
the dungheap.
No surpise.

Ridiculous asshole ..... aren't you being a little hard on yourself?