Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:04:11 +0000, Doug Kanter wrote:
Navy base in N-Bay? Was it installed after 1970, or was I below, making a sandwich when my dad cruised us through the bay way back then? Isn't Quonset Point, the Home of the Seabees, still there? |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "thunder" wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:04:11 +0000, Doug Kanter wrote: Navy base in N-Bay? Was it installed after 1970, or was I below, making a sandwich when my dad cruised us through the bay way back then? Isn't Quonset Point, the Home of the Seabees, still there? Dunno. I'm still dealing with the flu. I expect to be catered to for a few more days. Let me know what you find out about this Navy base. And, send over a couple of lap dancers or something. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 06:33:26 -0500, HarryKrause
wrote: ~~ snippage ~~ "Patty" O'Furniture? Hey, I realize it is the Day for Wearing the Green, but there's no need to crossdress You never know. :) Later, Tom |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:31:22 -0500, thunder
wrote: On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:04:11 +0000, Doug Kanter wrote: Navy base in N-Bay? Was it installed after 1970, or was I below, making a sandwich when my dad cruised us through the bay way back then? Isn't Quonset Point, the Home of the Seabees, still there? Quonset is still there but has been closed for a while. I believe there is a ANG group there, but not sure. Later, Tom |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:04:11 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "Patty O'Furniture" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:02:48 -0600, Richard J Kinch wrote: ~~ snippage ~~ He did remark that the buoys 300 ft off the shoreline were put in only a year or two ago. Now I wonder if there wasn't a 9/11 super-security justification for some new strict regulations. That's a good point. I know over in Narragansett Bay, the bridge restrictions are no stopping, anchoring or trolling within 500 feet of the bridges and the Navy base shore. The shore line is bouyed, but the bridges aren't. They aren't enforcing it though - it almost impossible to. Navy base in N-Bay? Was it installed after 1970, or was I below, making a sandwich when my dad cruised us through the bay way back then? It's the Navy's Antisubmarine Warfare Center in Newport, RI. Entering the Bay from East Passage, it's right after the Newport Bridge on the Starboard side. I'm pretty sure it was there in the '70s. Later, Tom |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Patty O'Furniture" wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:04:11 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Patty O'Furniture" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:02:48 -0600, Richard J Kinch wrote: ~~ snippage ~~ He did remark that the buoys 300 ft off the shoreline were put in only a year or two ago. Now I wonder if there wasn't a 9/11 super-security justification for some new strict regulations. That's a good point. I know over in Narragansett Bay, the bridge restrictions are no stopping, anchoring or trolling within 500 feet of the bridges and the Navy base shore. The shore line is bouyed, but the bridges aren't. They aren't enforcing it though - it almost impossible to. Navy base in N-Bay? Was it installed after 1970, or was I below, making a sandwich when my dad cruised us through the bay way back then? It's the Navy's Antisubmarine Warfare Center in Newport, RI. Entering the Bay from East Passage, it's right after the Newport Bridge on the Starboard side. I'm pretty sure it was there in the '70s. Later, Tom I must've been making a sandwich. But, I was pretty attentive to notes on the charts, especially since my father once drove us right through an area where there was a target practice ship parked, and got a rather terse talking to from a sub. Pretty funny, at least to my sister and I. :-) Dad was not amused. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Patty O'Furniture" wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:04:11 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Patty O'Furniture" wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:02:48 -0600, Richard J Kinch wrote: ~~ snippage ~~ He did remark that the buoys 300 ft off the shoreline were put in only a year or two ago. Now I wonder if there wasn't a 9/11 super-security justification for some new strict regulations. That's a good point. I know over in Narragansett Bay, the bridge restrictions are no stopping, anchoring or trolling within 500 feet of the bridges and the Navy base shore. The shore line is bouyed, but the bridges aren't. They aren't enforcing it though - it almost impossible to. Navy base in N-Bay? Was it installed after 1970, or was I below, making a sandwich when my dad cruised us through the bay way back then? It's the Navy's Antisubmarine Warfare Center in Newport, RI. Entering the Bay from East Passage, it's right after the Newport Bridge on the Starboard side. I'm pretty sure it was there in the '70s. Later, Tom I must've been making a sandwich. But, I was pretty attentive to notes on the charts, especially since my father once drove us right through an area where there was a target practice ship parked, and got a rather terse talking to from a sub. Pretty funny, at least to my sister and I. :-) Dad was not amused. Before the correction robots get all fussy, I should add that this area was not in N-Bay, but out in the Block Island Sound, if I recall, maybe halfway between BI and Montauk, maybe somewhat north of a line drawn between those two places. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:23:03 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: ~~ snippage ~~ Before the correction robots get all fussy, I should add that this area was not in N-Bay, but out in the Block Island Sound, if I recall, maybe halfway between BI and Montauk, maybe somewhat north of a line drawn between those two places. Yep - it's called a torpedo range. Purple colored area on the chart. There are four of them in that area :) Later, Tom |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Harris" wrote in message
... Is there a boater vs swimmer lobby? The buoys are there to indicate to boaters that they may not approach closer than 300 feet from the beach. This form of local ordinance is fairly common along the beaches in southeast Florida and includes parts of Pompano Beach and Ft. Lauderdale as well as other municipalities. The intent is to limit the interaction between propellers and swimmers! This is along the unprotected ocean. It is a dangerous and risky practice to allow boaters along the surf line in close proximity to swimmers. This has nothing to do with fishing or 9/11. HTH Dan Probably nobody here will talk to me ever again, but this regulation sounds like a good idea. Combine swimmers, propellors, booze and an average frequency of stupid operators which we can assume is no different than automobile drivers, and you've got a reason to be concerned. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Harris" wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:10:13 -0600, Richard J Kinch wrote: I was dismayed to learn today that the beach from Pompano Beach to Lauderdale-by-the-Sea is a "vessel exclusion" zone. The buoys say "Ordinance 389" or some such, but Google turns up nothing relevant on "exclusion zones" for "Flordia", "389", "Broward", "Lauderdale", etc. This means I can't stop at my mom's private beachfront condominium and pick up passengers with a (motorized) dinghy at the beach. Nor can you fish from the beach! As soon as I tried beaching today, a state boat appeared withing seconds and gave me a warning. (Apparently there are busybodies in the buildings ashore that phone 911 if you try it.) The officer said you can't even raise the outboard and oar yourself in, you can't have any power available on the boat, not even an electric trolling motor. When did Florida start outlawing fishing and boating from the beach? Just how does one find such picayune, strictly local laws? Is there a boater vs swimmer lobby? The buoys are there to indicate to boaters that they may not approach closer than 300 feet from the beach. This form of local ordinance is fairly common along the beaches in southeast Florida and includes parts of Pompano Beach and Ft. Lauderdale as well as other municipalities. The intent is to limit the interaction between propellers and swimmers! This is along the unprotected ocean. It is a dangerous and risky practice to allow boaters along the surf line in close proximity to swimmers. This has nothing to do with fishing or 9/11. HTH Dan -- Dan Harris I agree with your logic Dan. However, if an entire stretch of beach is closed off to boaters then tit is being taken to an extreme. We have the some restrictions at certain beach areas on Lake Erie, such as at Cedar Point beach, Huntington beach, Edgewater beach and at the north end of Kelley's Island. We would normally just got to one end of the restricted area, set anchor at about 4 feet and then pull the boat closer to shore (perhaps to waist deep water) with a stern line and then set a stern anchor. That way we could enjoy the beach while having the comforts of the boat at hand. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bill Moyers on environment, politics and Christian fundamentalists | General | |||
Novice Lessons 9 - a reprint | ASA | |||
A tough question for Jeff and Shen44 | ASA |