krause

you senile 76 year old senile old toothless old fool,,,,,

you abused your own children, you said YOURSELF that they left you promising
never to associate again,,, you are on your third wife,, stuffed mom into a
home just far enough away to discourage a visit,,, and you talk about
abusing animals,,, lol,,, krause,,, you are the limit,,, the speed limit,,,







"hkrause" wrote in message
news:1110902845.236ca8d68d19e7030f87da6d36e8c971@t eranews...
Jim Carter wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.


Seal meat is delicious! It's right up there with deer meat and caribou.
Hunting for food & fur for clothing has been a tradition for the people
of
Newfoundland for centuries.
Jim




I have no objections to people who hunt animals and kill them for meat in
order to provide food for the table they cannot obtain at a supermarket
because they haven't the funds or because they live in isolated areas. I
also have no objections to those who hunt because they need to wear the
skins or fur of the animals they kill.

Commercial seal hunting - hunting wild animals for fur, as it were - is
not an activity I find acceptable.

"Gordon" wrote in message
...

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...
I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Seal meat is delicious! It's right up there with deer meat and
caribou.
Hunting for food & fur for clothing has been a tradition for the
people
of
Newfoundland for centuries.
Jim

Not only that, the seals compete with fishermen for the few cod still
swimming out there.
The original poster should question the ranchers outside Yellowstone
Park
why they want to kill the wolves Canada was generous enough to donate a
while back.



How about the hunting outfitters outside jellystone? All gone along with
the wild elk and bison.
Gordon


Sure cure for wolves, 3 s, shoot, shovel, shut up

"Gordon" wrote in message
...


Sure cure for wolves, 3 s, shoot, shovel, shut up


If you don't want them...send them back. They were perfectly happy here &
didn't ask to immigrate to the states.

John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope. So, I'll ask.
You've stated that because I see nothing wrong with taking an animal
for food, that I "MUST get violently upset" if they are used for any
other reason? What in hell has made you come to that conclusion???? Be
specific, John. I'd really like to know how your mind comes to such a
thought, and then interprets it to be a "must".

On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.

You expect the "King of the NG idiots" to understand logic??????


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons
they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.
--
Well, then, John, do tell! I've asked you to be explicit. What would
make you think that I'd "get violently upset" about seals being killed
for "their pelts and their penises".

P.Fritz wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons
they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.

You expect the "King of the NG idiots" to understand logic??????

Fritz, I see that you are the only one in this whole newsgroup who's
not decided to act like an adult.
Now, seeing how you think YOU understand Herring's logic, do tell, what
would make him think that I'd "get violently upset about the two major
reasons they're killed, i.e., their pelts and their penises!"?

On 16 Mar 2005 10:32:52 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons
they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.
--
Well, then, John, do tell! I've asked you to be explicit. What would
make you think that I'd "get violently upset" about seals being killed
for "their pelts and their penises".

You have shown no evidence of trying harder.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

I've seen the Newfoundlanders sell seal flippers right on the waterfront in
St. John's as a delicacy. I've also seen the seal skin garments and
trinkets. I've never eaten or bought anything made of seal but many people
apparently like to.
BTW the Norwegians were also regular hunters, although I'm not sure if they
have continued. The thing is...it's no worse than snaring rabbits or using
the leghold traps for other game.