OT Cananda...Home of the slughtered
 

Oh the great civilized country of Canada, with its social programs and
total respect for human rights. It's a place where a hypocritical
liberal can still plunge an ice pick through the skull of a young seal
and still wash the blood off his/her cloths and be ready by noon to
demonstrate against the evil and barbaric Americans.
It no wonder why all the american lefty's want to move there.

http://www.hsus.org/marine_mammals/p...seal_hunt.html

Mule wrote:
Oh the great civilized country of Canada, with its social programs
and
total respect for human rights. It's a place where a hypocritical
liberal can still plunge an ice pick through the skull of a young
seal
and still wash the blood off his/her cloths and be ready by noon to
demonstrate against the evil and barbaric Americans.
It no wonder why all the american lefty's want to move there.


http://www.hsus.org/marine_mammals/p...seal_hunt.html

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Funny, I read the entire item and I didn't see a single reference to
"liberals" anywhere.

wrote in message
ups.com...
I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Seal meat is delicious! It's right up there with deer meat and caribou.
Hunting for food & fur for clothing has been a tradition for the people of
Newfoundland for centuries.
Jim

"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...
I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Seal meat is delicious! It's right up there with deer meat and caribou.
Hunting for food & fur for clothing has been a tradition for the people of
Newfoundland for centuries.
Jim

Not only that, the seals compete with fishermen for the few cod still
swimming out there.
The original poster should question the ranchers outside Yellowstone Park
why they want to kill the wolves Canada was generous enough to donate a
while back.

I think its the "skinning alive" part that ticks people off

Matt

Jim Carter wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Seal meat is delicious! It's right up there with deer meat and
caribou.
Hunting for food & fur for clothing has been a tradition for the
people of
Newfoundland for centuries.
Jim

As it has been for all humans.

wrote in message
oups.com...
I think its the "skinning alive" part that ticks people off

They used to club them until the WWF got pictures of that.
I'd prefer they shoot them to make death quick & painless as possible. I see
Richard Dean Anderson is the poster boy celeb this year. A few years ago
Martin Sheen was the man. His motel was surrounded on the Madeline Islands
and he got a good scare before retreating by helicopter.

On 15 Mar 2005 07:12:42 -0800, wrote:


Mule wrote:
Oh the great civilized country of Canada, with its social programs
and
total respect for human rights. It's a place where a hypocritical
liberal can still plunge an ice pick through the skull of a young
seal
and still wash the blood off his/her cloths and be ready by noon to
demonstrate against the evil and barbaric Americans.
It no wonder why all the american lefty's want to move there.


http://www.hsus.org/marine_mammals/p...seal_hunt.html

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons they're killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...
I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Seal meat is delicious! It's right up there with deer meat and
caribou.
Hunting for food & fur for clothing has been a tradition for the people
of
Newfoundland for centuries.
Jim

Not only that, the seals compete with fishermen for the few cod still
swimming out there.
The original poster should question the ranchers outside Yellowstone Park
why they want to kill the wolves Canada was generous enough to donate a
while back.



How about the hunting outfitters outside jellystone? All gone along with
the wild elk and bison.
Gordon

krause

you senile 76 year old senile old toothless old fool,,,,,

you abused your own children, you said YOURSELF that they left you promising
never to associate again,,, you are on your third wife,, stuffed mom into a
home just far enough away to discourage a visit,,, and you talk about
abusing animals,,, lol,,, krause,,, you are the limit,,, the speed limit,,,







"hkrause" wrote in message
news:1110902845.236ca8d68d19e7030f87da6d36e8c971@t eranews...
Jim Carter wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.


Seal meat is delicious! It's right up there with deer meat and caribou.
Hunting for food & fur for clothing has been a tradition for the people
of
Newfoundland for centuries.
Jim




I have no objections to people who hunt animals and kill them for meat in
order to provide food for the table they cannot obtain at a supermarket
because they haven't the funds or because they live in isolated areas. I
also have no objections to those who hunt because they need to wear the
skins or fur of the animals they kill.

Commercial seal hunting - hunting wild animals for fur, as it were - is
not an activity I find acceptable.

"Gordon" wrote in message
...

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...
I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Seal meat is delicious! It's right up there with deer meat and
caribou.
Hunting for food & fur for clothing has been a tradition for the
people
of
Newfoundland for centuries.
Jim

Not only that, the seals compete with fishermen for the few cod still
swimming out there.
The original poster should question the ranchers outside Yellowstone
Park
why they want to kill the wolves Canada was generous enough to donate a
while back.



How about the hunting outfitters outside jellystone? All gone along with
the wild elk and bison.
Gordon


Sure cure for wolves, 3 s, shoot, shovel, shut up

"Gordon" wrote in message
...


Sure cure for wolves, 3 s, shoot, shovel, shut up


If you don't want them...send them back. They were perfectly happy here &
didn't ask to immigrate to the states.

John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope. So, I'll ask.
You've stated that because I see nothing wrong with taking an animal
for food, that I "MUST get violently upset" if they are used for any
other reason? What in hell has made you come to that conclusion???? Be
specific, John. I'd really like to know how your mind comes to such a
thought, and then interprets it to be a "must".

On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.

You expect the "King of the NG idiots" to understand logic??????


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons
they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.
--
Well, then, John, do tell! I've asked you to be explicit. What would
make you think that I'd "get violently upset" about seals being killed
for "their pelts and their penises".

P.Fritz wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons
they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.

You expect the "King of the NG idiots" to understand logic??????

Fritz, I see that you are the only one in this whole newsgroup who's
not decided to act like an adult.
Now, seeing how you think YOU understand Herring's logic, do tell, what
would make him think that I'd "get violently upset about the two major
reasons they're killed, i.e., their pelts and their penises!"?

On 16 Mar 2005 10:32:52 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons
they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.
--
Well, then, John, do tell! I've asked you to be explicit. What would
make you think that I'd "get violently upset" about seals being killed
for "their pelts and their penises".

You have shown no evidence of trying harder.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

I've seen the Newfoundlanders sell seal flippers right on the waterfront in
St. John's as a delicacy. I've also seen the seal skin garments and
trinkets. I've never eaten or bought anything made of seal but many people
apparently like to.
BTW the Norwegians were also regular hunters, although I'm not sure if they
have continued. The thing is...it's no worse than snaring rabbits or using
the leghold traps for other game.

John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 10:32:52 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons
they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.
--
Well, then, John, do tell! I've asked you to be explicit. What would
make you think that I'd "get violently upset" about seals being
killed
for "their pelts and their penises".

You have shown no evidence of trying harder.
--
John H


As suspected from you. John, may I suggest that if you don't know what
you are talking about, then don't say anything? You had no idea about
whether I would "get violently upset" about anything. And having no
idea, is, by definition, ignorant.

On 16 Mar 2005 12:19:18 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 10:32:52 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major reasons
they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.
--
Well, then, John, do tell! I've asked you to be explicit. What would
make you think that I'd "get violently upset" about seals being
killed
for "their pelts and their penises".

You have shown no evidence of trying harder.
--
John H


As suspected from you. John, may I suggest that if you don't know what
you are talking about, then don't say anything? You had no idea about
whether I would "get violently upset" about anything. And having no
idea, is, by definition, ignorant.

You *seem* a little upset.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

wrote in message
oups.com...

Fritz, I see that you are the only one in this whole newsgroup who's
not decided to act like an adult.

Harry is still calling names... but you'll give him the special pass, eh?

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 07:12:42 -0800, atl_man2 wrote:


Mule wrote:
Oh the great civilized country of Canada, with its social programs
and
total respect for human rights. It's a place where a hypocritical
liberal can still plunge an ice pick through the skull of a young
seal
and still wash the blood off his/her cloths and be ready by noon to
demonstrate against the evil and barbaric Americans.
It no wonder why all the american lefty's want to move there.


http://www.hsus.org/marine_mammals/p...seal_hunt.html

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

From what I understand, they don't take the meat, just the pelt (and the
penis?). That's definitely a shame, but you gotta ask yourself: would
there be as much of an outcry if they were slimy, reptilian creatures? How
much of the objections are not because they're ANIMALS, but that they're
CUTE animals? Think about that the next time you step on a spider, or
watch a shark get slaughtered...

Lloyd

From what I understand, they don't take the meat, just the pelt (and
the
penis?). That's definitely a shame, but you gotta ask yourself: would
there be as much of an outcry if they were slimy, reptilian creatures?
How
much of the objections are not because they're ANIMALS, but that
they're
CUTE animals? Think about that the next time you step on a spider, or
watch a shark get slaughtered...

Lloyd


************

If they were rats, most places would *require* that they be killed. A
rat is no more or less alive than a seal, but as you observe rats are
not considered cute.

Personally, I am opposed to waste. In the traditional native hunts,
only those animals needed for food or raw materials were killed and the
indigenous people found a use for virtually every part of the
carcasses.

BTW Lloyd: Our US title (concealed in NG to avoid accusations of SPAM)
is now available up your way as a "freebie". Much the same editorial
content you're used to seeing offered at $4.65 Canadian. Now you'll
simply have to use discriminating literary taste, rather than financial
priorities, as the best reason *not* to read our stuff. :-)

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:05:32 -0800, Lloyd Sumpter wrote:

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 07:12:42 -0800, atl_man2 wrote:


Mule wrote:
Oh the great civilized country of Canada, with its social programs
and
total respect for human rights. It's a place where a hypocritical
liberal can still plunge an ice pick through the skull of a young
seal
and still wash the blood off his/her cloths and be ready by noon to
demonstrate against the evil and barbaric Americans.
It no wonder why all the american lefty's want to move there.


http://www.hsus.org/marine_mammals/p...seal_hunt.html

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

From what I understand, they don't take the meat, just the pelt (and the
penis?). That's definitely a shame, but you gotta ask yourself: would
there be as much of an outcry if they were slimy, reptilian creatures? How
much of the objections are not because they're ANIMALS, but that they're
CUTE animals? Think about that the next time you step on a spider, or
watch a shark get slaughtered...

Lloyd


Good point. Not a whole lot of complaining (that I've heard) about the
rattlesnake roundups!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 12:19:18 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 10:32:52 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major
reasons
they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.
--
Well, then, John, do tell! I've asked you to be explicit. What
would
make you think that I'd "get violently upset" about seals being
killed
for "their pelts and their penises".

You have shown no evidence of trying harder.
--
John H


As suspected from you. John, may I suggest that if you don't know
what
you are talking about, then don't say anything? You had no idea
about
whether I would "get violently upset" about anything. And having no
idea, is, by definition, ignorant.

You *seem* a little upset.
--
John H

ANOTHER ignorant statement. Please show how you came to such a
conclusion. Remember, now, we're talking about seals here, not your
inability to realize that you don't know what you are talking about,
when making statements about me. Where did I ever say anything that
would make you think that I'd get either "violently upset" over taking
seals for their body parts, or, that I "seem to be a little upset" over
taking seals for their body parts?

Jack Goff wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Fritz, I see that you are the only one in this whole newsgroup
who's
not decided to act like an adult.

Harry is still calling names... but you'll give him the special pass,
eh?

Nope. What would make you think I'd "give him a special pass"?

Jack Goff wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Fritz, I see that you are the only one in this whole newsgroup
who's
not decided to act like an adult.

Harry is still calling names... but you'll give him the special pass,
eh?

I've always stated that name calling here is childish. Do you disagree?

On 17 Mar 2005 06:33:37 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 12:19:18 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 10:32:52 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major
reasons
they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.
--
Well, then, John, do tell! I've asked you to be explicit. What
would
make you think that I'd "get violently upset" about seals being
killed
for "their pelts and their penises".

You have shown no evidence of trying harder.
--
John H


As suspected from you. John, may I suggest that if you don't know
what
you are talking about, then don't say anything? You had no idea
about
whether I would "get violently upset" about anything. And having no
idea, is, by definition, ignorant.

You *seem* a little upset.
--
John H

ANOTHER ignorant statement. Please show how you came to such a
conclusion. Remember, now, we're talking about seals here, not your
inability to realize that you don't know what you are talking about,
when making statements about me. Where did I ever say anything that
would make you think that I'd get either "violently upset" over taking
seals for their body parts, or, that I "seem to be a little upset" over
taking seals for their body parts?

Does it not upset you that "pelts and penises" are the primary reasons for
killing the little buggers?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 17 Mar 2005 06:34:31 -0800, wrote:


Jack Goff wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Fritz, I see that you are the only one in this whole newsgroup
who's
not decided to act like an adult.

Harry is still calling names... but you'll give him the special pass,
eh?

Nope. What would make you think I'd "give him a special pass"?

basskisser, you *do* seem a little selective in your 'name-caller' accusations.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 17 Mar 2005 06:35:26 -0800, wrote:


Jack Goff wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Fritz, I see that you are the only one in this whole newsgroup
who's
not decided to act like an adult.

Harry is still calling names... but you'll give him the special pass,
eh?

I've always stated that name calling here is childish. Do you disagree?

I agree. I've even seen you do it as you're calling someone a name!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 17 Mar 2005 06:34:31 -0800, wrote:


Jack Goff wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Fritz, I see that you are the only one in this whole newsgroup
who's
not decided to act like an adult.

Harry is still calling names... but you'll give him the special pass,
eh?

Nope. What would make you think I'd "give him a special pass"?

basskisser, you *do* seem a little selective in your 'name-caller'
accusations.

That is because his two brain cells are not capable of remembering anything
past the last word typed.

He is the "King"


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 17 Mar 2005 06:35:26 -0800, wrote:


Jack Goff wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Fritz, I see that you are the only one in this whole newsgroup
who's
not decided to act like an adult.

Harry is still calling names... but you'll give him the special pass,
eh?

I've always stated that name calling here is childish. Do you disagree?

I agree. I've even seen you do it as you're calling someone a name!

Which is why he remains the "King of the NG idiots"

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

P.Fritz wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On 17 Mar 2005 06:34:31 -0800, wrote:


Jack Goff wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Fritz, I see that you are the only one in this whole newsgroup
who's
not decided to act like an adult.

Harry is still calling names... but you'll give him the special
pass,
eh?

Nope. What would make you think I'd "give him a special pass"?

basskisser, you *do* seem a little selective in your 'name-caller'
accusations.

That is because his two brain cells are not capable of remembering
anything
past the last word typed.

He is the "King"

Hehe! Agreeing, WHILE calling me a name....that's rich!!!!

John H wrote:
On 17 Mar 2005 06:33:37 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 12:19:18 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 10:32:52 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major
reasons
they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.
--
Well, then, John, do tell! I've asked you to be explicit. What
would
make you think that I'd "get violently upset" about seals
being
killed
for "their pelts and their penises".

You have shown no evidence of trying harder.
--
John H


As suspected from you. John, may I suggest that if you don't know
what
you are talking about, then don't say anything? You had no idea
about
whether I would "get violently upset" about anything. And having
no
idea, is, by definition, ignorant.

You *seem* a little upset.
--
John H

ANOTHER ignorant statement. Please show how you came to such a
conclusion. Remember, now, we're talking about seals here, not your
inability to realize that you don't know what you are talking about,
when making statements about me. Where did I ever say anything that
would make you think that I'd get either "violently upset" over
taking
seals for their body parts, or, that I "seem to be a little upset"
over
taking seals for their body parts?

Does it not upset you that "pelts and penises" are the primary
reasons for
killing the little buggers?
--
John H

Hmm, so, you aren't going to answer my above questions, huh? By the
way, by now ASKING if it upsets me, proves that by definition, your
posts about me being violently upset, as well as the one that I "seem
to be a little upset", were posted in ignorance. Thank you for helping
make my point!

John H wrote:
On 17 Mar 2005 06:35:26 -0800, wrote:


Jack Goff wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Fritz, I see that you are the only one in this whole newsgroup
who's
not decided to act like an adult.

Harry is still calling names... but you'll give him the special
pass,
eh?

I've always stated that name calling here is childish. Do you
disagree?

I agree. I've even seen you do it as you're calling someone a name!
--
John H

Proof?

On 17 Mar 2005 09:14:16 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 17 Mar 2005 06:33:37 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 12:19:18 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 10:32:52 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 09:13:05 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:

I see nothing wrong with taking an animal for food.

Then you must get violently upset about the two major
reasons
they're
killed,
i.e., their pelts and their penises!
--
John H


Hmm, let's see if I can understand you logic.....nope.

Try harder.
--
Well, then, John, do tell! I've asked you to be explicit. What
would
make you think that I'd "get violently upset" about seals
being
killed
for "their pelts and their penises".

You have shown no evidence of trying harder.
--
John H


As suspected from you. John, may I suggest that if you don't know
what
you are talking about, then don't say anything? You had no idea
about
whether I would "get violently upset" about anything. And having
no
idea, is, by definition, ignorant.

You *seem* a little upset.
--
John H

ANOTHER ignorant statement. Please show how you came to such a
conclusion. Remember, now, we're talking about seals here, not your
inability to realize that you don't know what you are talking about,
when making statements about me. Where did I ever say anything that
would make you think that I'd get either "violently upset" over
taking
seals for their body parts, or, that I "seem to be a little upset"
over
taking seals for their body parts?

Does it not upset you that "pelts and penises" are the primary
reasons for
killing the little buggers?
--
John H

Hmm, so, you aren't going to answer my above questions, huh? By the
way, by now ASKING if it upsets me, proves that by definition, your
posts about me being violently upset, as well as the one that I "seem
to be a little upset", were posted in ignorance. Thank you for helping
make my point!

You're welcome! Goodness, that's the nicest thing you've said all day!

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 17 Mar 2005 09:15:26 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 17 Mar 2005 06:35:26 -0800, wrote:


Jack Goff wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Fritz, I see that you are the only one in this whole newsgroup
who's
not decided to act like an adult.

Harry is still calling names... but you'll give him the special
pass,
eh?

I've always stated that name calling here is childish. Do you
disagree?

I agree. I've even seen you do it as you're calling someone a name!
--
John H

Proof?

Yes!

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On 17 Mar 2005 09:15:26 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 17 Mar 2005 06:35:26 -0800, wrote:


Jack Goff wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Fritz, I see that you are the only one in this whole
newsgroup
who's
not decided to act like an adult.

Harry is still calling names... but you'll give him the special
pass,
eh?

I've always stated that name calling here is childish. Do you
disagree?

I agree. I've even seen you do it as you're calling someone a
name!
--
John H

Proof?

Yes!

Let's see it, then.