"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
No, but I was pointing out how many liberals like to say enforce laws on
others that they don't want forced on themselves.

The rules never apply to liebrals.......remember?



"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:31:11 -0500, "Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd."
wrote:

I am surprised that someone who is a strong proponent of making handguns
illegal is now bragging about his target practice that will allow him to
kill an intruder.. It is also interesting to note, that this proponent
of
gun control is not only interested in protecting himself with a gun, but
wants to be able to shot the intruder in the head. It is also
interesting
to note that this same person said he would never own a handgun.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
I'm off for a few hours, DandyDon. The shooting lesson I had scheduled
for
yesterday was postponed until today. You see, I have a somewhat
over-the-edge guy from Thailand threatening a violent invasion of my
home,
and I want to be sure I am ready for him. Today's lesson: improving my
aim
so I can place all my headshots from 15' away inside the diameter of a
golf ball, instead of merely closely surrounding one.

So, Dandy, consider yourself answered...and now you can go back to
marveling at the rest of the universe, doing whatever it is you do.

Ciao!


Doctor, are you implying that you believe that stuff?


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
I sure am glad I didn't respond to Don's message.

Why did you think it is acceptable to use Don's message as an opportunity
to
heap criticism on others?

Huh?? My computer says you did reply to my reply to the original poster.
Is it all getting a bit confusing trying to keep up?

Don,
I replied to your comment, I did not respond to the original Don (Don
Dando). Do you need a scorecard to keep up with this thread? ; )


"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
I sure am glad I didn't respond to Don's message.

Why did you think it is acceptable to use Don's message as an opportunity
to
heap criticism on others?

Huh?? My computer says you did reply to my reply to the original
poster.
Is it all getting a bit confusing trying to keep up?

P.Fritz wrote:
"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
No, but I was pointing out how many liberals like to say enforce
laws on
others that they don't want forced on themselves.

The rules never apply to liebrals.......remember?


So, I take it that you are the only one in this newsgroup who still
refuses to give up the childish name calling, etc.?

"Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd." wrote in message
...
Don,
I replied to your comment, I did not respond to the original Don (Don
Dando). Do you need a scorecard to keep up with this thread? ; )


Ok..you're off the hook...but you gotta be more specific when you say "Don"!

"Dr" Smithers quacked:

I sure am glad I didn't respond to Don's message.


Why did you think it is acceptable to use Don's message as an
opportunity to
heap criticism on others?


***********************

Two comments: Prior to my comment you had participated in the thread
four times. Three of those comments were anti-Harry, and the fourth a
criticism of liberals in general. You certainly have no need to ask why
it would be acceptable to use a thread to heap criticism on others,
unless you have no idea why you do what you did prior to my comment in
this trhread.

I criticized Parties A, B, C, etc. I will accept a protest from parties
A, B, and C as they were specifically named in my indictment. :-) Why
are you saying anything at all? Does the shoe fit so well you suspect
most will just expect you to be one of the folks who is wearing it? If
so, why do you believe most people would suspect my comment applied to
you? Would it have anything to do with your choice of behavior?

One of the funniest and most predictable responses in a group like this
is that one can say, "I sure get tired of miserable, pig headed,
hatefully motivated, negatively oriented, character assassins" and sure
as the sun rises in the east somebody will speak up and say, "Yeah?
Well we get tired of you, too."

I hate replying to this crap, but...

Anti-gun activists routinely start with handguns and "assault rifles".
If you are suggesting that someone who opposes guns is in favor of
handguns over rifles and shotguns, you are out of your mind. What is
your point and where did you come from? I don't remember seeing you
here until now, and I don't have the time to go the search, but I don't
remember you ever contributing to a boating related topic.

wrote:
Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. wrote:

I am surprised that someone who is a strong proponent of making

handguns

illegal is now bragging about his target practice that will allow him

to

kill an intruder..


Did you ever stop to think that MAY be because all firearms aren't
HANDGUNS??

It is also interesting to note, that this proponent of

gun control is not only interested in protecting himself with a gun,

but

wants to be able to shot the intruder in the head.


Interesting? Why? "control" doesn't mean elimination.

It is also interesting

to note that this same person said he would never own a handgun.


See above....does it HAVE to be a handgun?

Dr. Jonathan Smithers, MD Phd. wrote:
I am surprised that someone who is a strong proponent of making handguns
illegal is now bragging about his target practice that will allow him to
kill an intruder.. It is also interesting to note, that this proponent of
gun control is not only interested in protecting himself with a gun, but
wants to be able to shot the intruder in the head. It is also interesting
to note that this same person said he would never own a handgun.

Hell, Harry doesn't need a handgun, doesn't he still have his
attack-trained bobcat? You know, the one that eats German Shepherds.
Well, maybe it doesn't like Thai food.

wrote in message
ups.com...

John H wrote:
On 9 Mar 2005 08:53:28 -0800, wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:

harry is basically a bitter old man

To any and all who have read Fritz's diatribes:
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!!!!
Just watch, he'll come back with a bunch of childish name calling,
etc.

Good morning, basskisser. Please tell us the purpose of your post.

--
John H

Quite simple, actually. I am pointing out that Fritz's statement about
calling Harry a "bitter old man" seems to be his reflection of himself.
Look at the nature of 99.99% of his posts, and it will become quite
obvious.


Asshole.

On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:12:12 GMT, "Don Dando"
wrote:

I have sent him several emails asking what the source of his reporting is
but I never get any replies. I have asked if he is or has been a
journalists, but I get no replies.

Sorry about that. I have been very busy with Homeland Security issues,
and advising for the Iraq war. What can i do for you?

Does anyone have a clue why he reports the news as though he had just filed
his report with Associated Press?

It is because I work for Assiated Press. I didnt know I was coming
across that strong.

It appears that on rare occasion he goes for a boat ride, but then he very
quickly returns to the news reporting.

Yes. I am a millionaire. I own a mansion and a yatch. Now where is
that srcewy rabbit?

Is this the only place on the internet that he can freely "play"
journalists?

Dont you dare insult me here. I will call your ISP, and have you
forcably removed from the internet. Ive done it before, and Ill do it
again.

Now I gotta go. Pioliting my own ABBA hydro in Spain.