On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


I'm posting this only to show basskisser that it is possible to ignore written
material. Also, it is possible to entertain thoughts without resorting to
personal insults.

John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the
New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones
hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage
on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll
be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


I'm posting this only to show basskisser that it is possible to ignore
written
material. Also, it is possible to entertain thoughts without resorting to
personal insults.

I haven't insulted you, unless you're one of those guys who takes it
personally when someone disagrees with his choice of TV, lawnmower or car.
I'm simply pointing out that when you strip away all the valid, sane reasons
(which do not apply to our foreign policy lately), the only ones left are
the bizarre.

On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:21:55 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
news On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the
New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones
hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage
on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll
be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


I'm posting this only to show basskisser that it is possible to ignore
written
material. Also, it is possible to entertain thoughts without resorting to
personal insults.

I haven't insulted you, unless you're one of those guys who takes it
personally when someone disagrees with his choice of TV, lawnmower or car.
I'm simply pointing out that when you strip away all the valid, sane reasons
(which do not apply to our foreign policy lately), the only ones left are
the bizarre.


No, no. I didn't mean to imply that you had insulted me. I was attempting to
show basskisser that it was possible to write something *other than* the
personal insult one might feel like making upon reading a disagreeable post.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
news On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the
New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones
hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys
like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage
on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll
be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a
sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


I'm posting this only to show basskisser that it is possible to ignore
written
material. Also, it is possible to entertain thoughts without resorting to
personal insults.

I haven't insulted you, unless you're one of those guys who takes it
personally when someone disagrees with his choice of TV, lawnmower or car.
I'm simply pointing out that when you strip away all the valid, sane
reasons (which do not apply to our foreign policy lately), the only ones
left are the bizarre.

What's bizarre is the inability to see the good things happening in the
Middle East right now as a result of Bush's policies. One would have to be
stupid or ignorant to not see it. Which are you? (Pick one).

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
news On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory
strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the
New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones
hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys
like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage
on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll
be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you
a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a
sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


I'm posting this only to show basskisser that it is possible to ignore
written
material. Also, it is possible to entertain thoughts without resorting
to
personal insults.

I haven't insulted you, unless you're one of those guys who takes it
personally when someone disagrees with his choice of TV, lawnmower or
car. I'm simply pointing out that when you strip away all the valid, sane
reasons (which do not apply to our foreign policy lately), the only ones
left are the bizarre.

What's bizarre is the inability to see the good things happening in the
Middle East right now as a result of Bush's policies. One would have to
be stupid or ignorant to not see it. Which are you? (Pick one).



I'm someone who does not agree with this statement of foreign policy:
U.S. to Arab World: "Stop hating us, or suffer the consequences". You know
it's true, although you're too small to admit it publicly.

What's bizarre is the inability to see the good things happening in the
Middle East right now as a result of Bush's policies.

Like what?

... One would have to
be stupid or ignorant to not see it. Which are you? (Pick one).


One would have to be either high on cheap drugs, or very thoroughly
insulated from reality, to actually believe that Bush/Cheney's policy's
have had anything to do with "good things happening in the Middle East"
other than Iraq's recent election.


Doug Kanter wrote:
I'm someone who does not agree with this statement of foreign policy:
U.S. to Arab World: "Stop hating us, or suffer the consequences". You know
it's true, although you're too small to admit it publicly.


Maybe, he admitted last week that he was wrong about something else.
Reality may be seeping in through the wrinkles in his tinfoil beanie.

DSK

On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:03 -0500, DSK wrote:

What's bizarre is the inability to see the good things happening in the
Middle East right now as a result of Bush's policies.

Like what?

... One would have to
be stupid or ignorant to not see it. Which are you? (Pick one).


One would have to be either high on cheap drugs, or very thoroughly
insulated from reality, to actually believe that Bush/Cheney's policy's
have had anything to do with "good things happening in the Middle East"
other than Iraq's recent election.


Doug Kanter wrote:
I'm someone who does not agree with this statement of foreign policy:
U.S. to Arab World: "Stop hating us, or suffer the consequences". You know
it's true, although you're too small to admit it publicly.


Maybe, he admitted last week that he was wrong about something else.
Reality may be seeping in through the wrinkles in his tinfoil beanie.

DSK

I guess Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden were higher than a kite last week. They
both had good things to say.


John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
I guess Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden were higher than a kite last week. They
both had good things to say.


And Hillary Clinton is of course a definitive influence on your thinking.

DSK

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:03 -0500, DSK wrote:

What's bizarre is the inability to see the good things happening in the
Middle East right now as a result of Bush's policies.

Like what?

... One would have to
be stupid or ignorant to not see it. Which are you? (Pick one).


One would have to be either high on cheap drugs, or very thoroughly
insulated from reality, to actually believe that Bush/Cheney's policy's
have had anything to do with "good things happening in the Middle East"
other than Iraq's recent election.


Doug Kanter wrote:
I'm someone who does not agree with this statement of foreign policy:
U.S. to Arab World: "Stop hating us, or suffer the consequences". You
know
it's true, although you're too small to admit it publicly.


Maybe, he admitted last week that he was wrong about something else.
Reality may be seeping in through the wrinkles in his tinfoil beanie.

DSK

I guess Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden were higher than a kite last week.
They
both had good things to say.

Hillary Clinton is planning for her Senate run in 2006, and the Presidential
run in 2008. She knows that it'd be political suicide to act like nothing
good is happening in the Middle East when the average person can see with
their own eyes that the Berlin Wall has fallen for the second time under a
Bush.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
news On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory
strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for
the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones
hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys
like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see
footage on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and
he'll be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you
a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a
sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


I'm posting this only to show basskisser that it is possible to ignore
written
material. Also, it is possible to entertain thoughts without resorting
to
personal insults.

I haven't insulted you, unless you're one of those guys who takes it
personally when someone disagrees with his choice of TV, lawnmower or
car. I'm simply pointing out that when you strip away all the valid,
sane reasons (which do not apply to our foreign policy lately), the only
ones left are the bizarre.

What's bizarre is the inability to see the good things happening in the
Middle East right now as a result of Bush's policies. One would have to
be stupid or ignorant to not see it. Which are you? (Pick one).



I'm someone who does not agree with this statement of foreign policy:
U.S. to Arab World: "Stop hating us, or suffer the consequences".

I think the message is "We don't care if you hate us, but leave our
interests and people the F*** alone. If you mess with us, we'll invade your
****ty ass country, kick out the government, and let the suppressed people
finally chose their own leader."