On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:27:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:42:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

I don't know about the rationalizations...but the retaliatory strike
plans
are certainly already written.

************************

"What this country needs is another Pearl Harbor" (Project for the New
American Century)

You guys need to be careful what you wish for.


*You guys*? I guess you mean the left as those are the only ones hoping
for bad things to happen, including in the Middle East. After all,
aren't
politics more important than Country for many on the left?


I'm not sure what Chuck meant, but I can add something useful: Boys like
NOYB want something bad to happen because it means they'll see footage on
TV
from cameras mounted on cruise missiles and stealth bombers, and he'll be
able to have sex again for a week or two afterward.


It's a shame I agreed to stopping personal insults.

But John....it's true. You know that. How else can one explain spastic
foreign policy decisions? Over the past couple of years, I've given you a
number of possible explanations including complete incompetence, or a sick
need for sexual excitement derived from violence. Pick one.


I'm posting this only to show basskisser that it is possible to ignore written
material. Also, it is possible to entertain thoughts without resorting to
personal insults.

John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."