Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Suzuki/Johnson DF140 vs Honda BF135 4 Strokes
I am planning to repower my 6m Aluminium Cuddy with a new 4 stroke
motor. I have come up with three candidates. The Suzuki DF140 (and the Johnson which is essentially a rebadged DF140) or the new Honda BF135. Suzuki DF140 DOHC inline 4 cyl 16 valve 2044cc 410lbs Honda BF135 DOHC inline 4 cyl ? valve 2354cc 477lbs If money was no object I'd go for the Honda because 1) 40 years of small, high powered/speed 4 stroke motors. 2) Reputation. 3) Large dealer network in Australia. However all these points command a price premium of more than US$3000. Therefore the Suzuki (or Johnson) is a big temptation. It looks great on paper, slightly more power, 67lbs lighter etc. However will it stand the test of time. I'd love to hear of others views/experiences etc with any of these outboards. Regards, Robert. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Suzuki/Johnson DF140 vs Honda BF135 4 Strokes
Chunky wrote:
I am planning to repower my 6m Aluminium Cuddy with a new 4 stroke motor. I have come up with three candidates. The Suzuki DF140 (and the Johnson which is essentially a rebadged DF140) or the new Honda BF135. Suzuki DF140 DOHC inline 4 cyl 16 valve 2044cc 410lbs Honda BF135 DOHC inline 4 cyl ? valve 2354cc 477lbs If money was no object I'd go for the Honda because 1) 40 years of small, high powered/speed 4 stroke motors. 2) Reputation. 3) Large dealer network in Australia. However all these points command a price premium of more than US$3000. Therefore the Suzuki (or Johnson) is a big temptation. It looks great on paper, slightly more power, 67lbs lighter etc. However will it stand the test of time. I'd love to hear of others views/experiences etc with any of these outboards. Regards, Robert. Suzuki has been making that engine for some time, and offers a strong warranty. How strong is the dealer you are considering, and what do his parts shelves look like? Those may be the critical factors for you. I find the Honda outboards overpriced. -- Email sent to is never read. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Suzuki/Johnson DF140 vs Honda BF135 4 Strokes
Hi Chunky,
I am a partner in a boat rental and fishing guide company. Several of our pontoon boats use the Suzuki DF50's. We have not had a problem with the Suzuki engines. One now has almost 3000 hours on it. Salt water corrosion does not seem to be a factor. Many of the local crab boats use the suzuki's as well. It is getting a strong following in the commercial market. The only "bad" thing I have to say is we go through a lot of expensive props, as renters can't tell an eddy current from a sandbar. Aftermarket spares are not generally available. (Not for Honda's either and parts are twice as costly.) The DF140's I have seen around the marina are very quiet. When idling, all you hear is the water discharge from the "pee hole." On a trip out with a friend and his new Edgewater, his twin 140's gave the boat plenty of speed, and we could hold a normal voice conversation. There was almost no vibration. Capt. Frank http://www.home.earthlink.net/~aartworks Chunky wrote: I am planning to repower my 6m Aluminium Cuddy with a new 4 stroke motor. I have come up with three candidates. The Suzuki DF140 (and the Johnson which is essentially a rebadged DF140) or the new Honda BF135. Suzuki DF140 DOHC inline 4 cyl 16 valve 2044cc 410lbs Honda BF135 DOHC inline 4 cyl ? valve 2354cc 477lbs If money was no object I'd go for the Honda because 1) 40 years of small, high powered/speed 4 stroke motors. 2) Reputation. 3) Large dealer network in Australia. However all these points command a price premium of more than US$3000. Therefore the Suzuki (or Johnson) is a big temptation. It looks great on paper, slightly more power, 67lbs lighter etc. However will it stand the test of time. I'd love to hear of others views/experiences etc with any of these outboards. Regards, Robert. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Suzuki/Johnson DF140 vs Honda BF135 4 Strokes
I am getting a warm feeling about the Suzuki DF140. Saw one today at one of
the local Suzuki dealers here in Australia. Including fit up, they want the equivalent of US$11,742. I brought up the lack of dealer support in Australia in comparison to Honda and the guy agreed but did mention that in Australia, to be able to enter the market, a outboard manufacter must be able to supply spare parts even if they pull out, as requred by law. Under the cowl, the Suzuki was a work of art in terms of the quality of finish of the powerhead. That is an indication of how serious the Japanese are to engineering. If it runs as good as it looks.... Thanks and regards, "Capt. Frank Hopkins" wrote in message hlink.net... Hi Chunky, I am a partner in a boat rental and fishing guide company. Several of our pontoon boats use the Suzuki DF50's. We have not had a problem with the Suzuki engines. One now has almost 3000 hours on it. Salt water corrosion does not seem to be a factor. Many of the local crab boats use the suzuki's as well. It is getting a strong following in the commercial market. The only "bad" thing I have to say is we go through a lot of expensive props, as renters can't tell an eddy current from a sandbar. Aftermarket spares are not generally available. (Not for Honda's either and parts are twice as costly.) The DF140's I have seen around the marina are very quiet. When idling, all you hear is the water discharge from the "pee hole." On a trip out with a friend and his new Edgewater, his twin 140's gave the boat plenty of speed, and we could hold a normal voice conversation. There was almost no vibration. Capt. Frank http://www.home.earthlink.net/~aartworks Chunky wrote: I am planning to repower my 6m Aluminium Cuddy with a new 4 stroke motor. I have come up with three candidates. The Suzuki DF140 (and the Johnson which is essentially a rebadged DF140) or the new Honda BF135. Suzuki DF140 DOHC inline 4 cyl 16 valve 2044cc 410lbs Honda BF135 DOHC inline 4 cyl ? valve 2354cc 477lbs If money was no object I'd go for the Honda because 1) 40 years of small, high powered/speed 4 stroke motors. 2) Reputation. 3) Large dealer network in Australia. However all these points command a price premium of more than US$3000. Therefore the Suzuki (or Johnson) is a big temptation. It looks great on paper, slightly more power, 67lbs lighter etc. However will it stand the test of time. I'd love to hear of others views/experiences etc with any of these outboards. Regards, Robert. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Suzuki/Johnson DF140 vs Honda BF135 4 Strokes
Any Yamahas over there? They have the 150 4 stroke out now. I'm very happy
with my Mercury-badged 115 EFI 4 stroke from Yamaha. Dan Chunky wrote: I am getting a warm feeling about the Suzuki DF140. Saw one today at one of the local Suzuki dealers here in Australia. Including fit up, they want the equivalent of US$11,742. I brought up the lack of dealer support in Australia in comparison to Honda and the guy agreed but did mention that in Australia, to be able to enter the market, a outboard manufacter must be able to supply spare parts even if they pull out, as requred by law. Under the cowl, the Suzuki was a work of art in terms of the quality of finish of the powerhead. That is an indication of how serious the Japanese are to engineering. If it runs as good as it looks.... Thanks and regards, "Capt. Frank Hopkins" wrote in message hlink.net... Hi Chunky, I am a partner in a boat rental and fishing guide company. Several of our pontoon boats use the Suzuki DF50's. We have not had a problem with the Suzuki engines. One now has almost 3000 hours on it. Salt water corrosion does not seem to be a factor. Many of the local crab boats use the suzuki's as well. It is getting a strong following in the commercial market. The only "bad" thing I have to say is we go through a lot of expensive props, as renters can't tell an eddy current from a sandbar. Aftermarket spares are not generally available. (Not for Honda's either and parts are twice as costly.) The DF140's I have seen around the marina are very quiet. When idling, all you hear is the water discharge from the "pee hole." On a trip out with a friend and his new Edgewater, his twin 140's gave the boat plenty of speed, and we could hold a normal voice conversation. There was almost no vibration. Capt. Frank http://www.home.earthlink.net/~aartworks Chunky wrote: I am planning to repower my 6m Aluminium Cuddy with a new 4 stroke motor. I have come up with three candidates. The Suzuki DF140 (and the Johnson which is essentially a rebadged DF140) or the new Honda BF135. Suzuki DF140 DOHC inline 4 cyl 16 valve 2044cc 410lbs Honda BF135 DOHC inline 4 cyl ? valve 2354cc 477lbs If money was no object I'd go for the Honda because 1) 40 years of small, high powered/speed 4 stroke motors. 2) Reputation. 3) Large dealer network in Australia. However all these points command a price premium of more than US$3000. Therefore the Suzuki (or Johnson) is a big temptation. It looks great on paper, slightly more power, 67lbs lighter etc. However will it stand the test of time. I'd love to hear of others views/experiences etc with any of these outboards. Regards, Robert. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question | General |