| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Chunky,
I am a partner in a boat rental and fishing guide company. Several of our pontoon boats use the Suzuki DF50's. We have not had a problem with the Suzuki engines. One now has almost 3000 hours on it. Salt water corrosion does not seem to be a factor. Many of the local crab boats use the suzuki's as well. It is getting a strong following in the commercial market. The only "bad" thing I have to say is we go through a lot of expensive props, as renters can't tell an eddy current from a sandbar. Aftermarket spares are not generally available. (Not for Honda's either and parts are twice as costly.) The DF140's I have seen around the marina are very quiet. When idling, all you hear is the water discharge from the "pee hole." On a trip out with a friend and his new Edgewater, his twin 140's gave the boat plenty of speed, and we could hold a normal voice conversation. There was almost no vibration. Capt. Frank http://www.home.earthlink.net/~aartworks Chunky wrote: I am planning to repower my 6m Aluminium Cuddy with a new 4 stroke motor. I have come up with three candidates. The Suzuki DF140 (and the Johnson which is essentially a rebadged DF140) or the new Honda BF135. Suzuki DF140 DOHC inline 4 cyl 16 valve 2044cc 410lbs Honda BF135 DOHC inline 4 cyl ? valve 2354cc 477lbs If money was no object I'd go for the Honda because 1) 40 years of small, high powered/speed 4 stroke motors. 2) Reputation. 3) Large dealer network in Australia. However all these points command a price premium of more than US$3000. Therefore the Suzuki (or Johnson) is a big temptation. It looks great on paper, slightly more power, 67lbs lighter etc. However will it stand the test of time. I'd love to hear of others views/experiences etc with any of these outboards. Regards, Robert. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question | General | |||