JimH wailed:

This is ever so typical.

a. You delete the majority of my reply.


b. You make up things and present them as facts, then surround your
entire
argument around those made up *facts.


c. You delete sections of the post you respond to then twist the facts
as
they were originally presented.


Dispute the facts all you want Chuck. The facts show that you are
wrong.


BTW: Get over it, stop whining and move on.

***********

I was replying to a post that everybody following the thread had
already read, once.

No need to post it all again. The only aspect I was taking issue with
was your nutsy statement that I don't know anything about real estate.
You need to be more careful when jumping to such broad conclusions.
What you should say is "you don't agree with me on this issue", not
"you don't know anything about the subject". It is true that I don't
agree with you on the issue, nor would most sophisticated investors
agree with you. It is not true that I don't know anything about real
estate. Frankly, I know one heck of a lot.

How weird that you added these accusations:

"b. You make up things and present them as facts, then surround your
entire
argument around those made up *facts."


There is nothing in my reply to you that is "made up".


"c. You delete sections of the post you respond to then twist the
facts as
they were originally presented."


I reposted the portions of the post that I was disputing. You can
assume that I was not disputing your RE 101 lecture. How did I twist
your remark that I don't know anything about real estate?

Then there is this special gem:

"Dispute the facts all you want Chuck. The facts show that you are
wrong.


BTW: Get over it, stop whining and move on."

Good thing you already expressed your disdain for people who present
their opinions as if they were "facts", that will save me the trouble
of doing exactly the same thing. :-)