Thom Hartmann: 'When democracy failed - 2005: The warnings of history'
Posted on Thursday, February 24 @ 09:57:56 EST By Thom Hartmann, Common
Dreams

This weekend - February 27th - is the 72nd anniversary, but the
corporate media most likely won't cover it. The generation that
experienced this history firsthand is now largely dead, and only a few
of us dare hear their ghosts.

It started when the government, in the midst of an economic crisis,
received reports of an imminent terrorist attack. A foreign ideologue
had launched feeble attacks on a few famous buildings, but the media
largely ignored his relatively small efforts. The intelligence services
knew, however, that the odds were he would eventually succeed.
(Historians are still arguing whether or not rogue elements in the
intelligence service helped the terrorist. Some, like Sefton Delmer - a
London Daily Express reporter on the scene - say they certainly did not,
while others, like William Shirer, suggest they did.)

But the warnings of investigators were ignored at the highest levels, in
part because the government was distracted; the man who claimed to be
the nation's leader had not been elected by a majority vote and the
majority of citizens claimed he had no right to the powers he coveted.



He was a simpleton, some said, a cartoon character of a man who saw
things in black-and-white terms and didn't have the intellect to
understand the subtleties of running a nation in a complex and
internationalist world.

His coarse use of language - reflecting his political roots in a
southernmost state - and his simplistic and often-inflammatory
nationalistic rhetoric offended the aristocrats, foreign leaders, and
the well-educated elite in the government and media. And, as a young
man, he'd joined a secret society with an occult-sounding name and
bizarre initiation rituals that involved skulls and human bones.

Nonetheless, he knew the terrorist was going to strike (although he
didn't know where or when), and he had already considered his response.
When an aide brought him word that the nation's most prestigious
building was ablaze, he verified it was the terrorist who had struck and
then rushed to the scene and called a press conference.

"You are now witnessing the beginning of a great epoch in history," he
proclaimed, standing in front of the burned-out building, surrounded by
national media. "This fire," he said, his voice trembling with emotion,
"is the beginning." He used the occasion - "a sign from God," he called
it - to declare an all-out war on terrorism and its ideological
sponsors, a people, he said, who traced their origins to the Middle East
and found motivation for their evil deeds in their religion.

Two weeks later, the first detention center for terrorists was built in
Oranianberg to hold the first suspected allies of the infamous
terrorist. In a national outburst of patriotism, the leader's flag was
everywhere, even printed large in newspapers suitable for window display.

Within four weeks of the terrorist attack, the nation's now-popular
leader had pushed through legislation - in the name of combating
terrorism and fighting the philosophy he said spawned it - that
suspended constitutional guarantees of free speech, privacy, and habeas
corpus. Police could now intercept mail and wiretap phones; suspected
terrorists could be imprisoned without specific charges and without
access to their lawyers; police could sneak into people's homes without
warrants if the cases involved terrorism.

To get his patriotic "Decree on the Protection of People and State"
passed over the objections of concerned legislators and civil
libertarians, he agreed to put a 4-year sunset provision on it: if the
national emergency provoked by the terrorist attack was over by then,
the freedoms and rights would be returned to the people, and the police
agencies would be re-restrained. Legislators would later say they hadn't
had time to read the bill before voting on it.

Immediately after passage of the anti-terrorism act, his federal police
agencies stepped up their program of arresting suspicious persons and
holding them without access to lawyers or courts. In the first year only
a few hundred were interred, and those who objected were largely ignored
by the mainstream press, which was afraid to offend and thus lose access
to a leader with such high popularity ratings. Citizens who protested
the leader in public - and there were many - quickly found themselves
confronting the newly empowered police's batons, gas, and jail cells, or
fenced off in protest zones safely out of earshot of the leader's public
speeches. (In the meantime, he was taking almost daily lessons in public
speaking, learning to control his tonality, gestures, and facial
expressions. He became a very competent orator.)

Within the first months after that terrorist attack, at the suggestion
of a political advisor, he brought a formerly obscure word into common
usage. He wanted to stir a "racial pride" among his countrymen, so,
instead of referring to the nation by its name, he began to refer to it
as "The Homeland," a phrase publicly promoted in the introduction to a
1934 speech recorded in Leni Riefenstahl's famous propaganda movie
"Triumph Of The Will." As hoped, people's hearts swelled with pride, and
the beginning of an us-versus-them mentality was sewn. Our land was
"the" homeland, citizens thought: all others were simply foreign lands.
We are the "true people," he suggested, the only ones worthy of our
nation's concern; if bombs fall on others, or human rights are violated
in other nations and it makes our lives better, it's of little concern
to us.

Playing on this new implicitly racial nationalism, and exploiting a
disagreement with the French over his increasing militarism, he argued
that any international body that didn't act first and foremost in the
best interest of his own nation was neither relevant nor useful. He thus
withdrew his country from the League Of Nations in October, 1933, and
then negotiated a separate naval armaments agreement with Anthony Eden
of The United Kingdom to create a worldwide military ruling elite.

His propaganda minister orchestrated a campaign to ensure the people
that he was a deeply religious man and that his motivations were rooted
in Christianity. He even proclaimed the need for a revival of the
Christian faith across his nation, what he called a "New Christianity."
Every man in his rapidly growing army wore a belt buckle that declared
"Gott Mit Uns" - God Is With Us - and most of them fervently believed it
was true.

Within a year of the terrorist attack, the nation's leader determined
that the various local police and federal agencies around the nation
were lacking the clear communication and overall coordinated
administration necessary to deal with the terrorist threat facing the
nation, particularly those citizens who were of Middle Eastern ancestry
and thus probably terrorist and communist sympathizers, and various
troublesome "intellectuals" and "liberals." He proposed a single new
national agency to protect the security of the homeland, consolidating
the actions of dozens of previously independent police, border, and
investigative agencies under a single leader.

He appointed one of his most trusted associates to be leader of this new
agency, the Central Security Office for the homeland, and gave it a role
in the government equal to the other major departments.

His assistant who dealt with the press noted that, since the terrorist
attack, "Radio and press are at out disposal." Those voices questioning
the legitimacy of their nation's leader, or raising questions about his
checkered past, had by now faded from the public's recollection as his
central security office began advertising a program encouraging people
to phone in tips about suspicious neighbors. This program was so
successful that the names of some of the people "denounced" were soon
being broadcast on radio stations. Those denounced often included
opposition politicians and news reporters who dared speak out - a
favorite target of his regime and the media he now controlled through
intimidation and ownership by corporate allies.

To consolidate his power, he concluded that government alone wasn't
enough. He reached out to industry and forged an alliance, bringing
former executives of the nation's largest corporations into high
government positions. A flood of government money poured into corporate
coffers to fight the war against the Middle Eastern ancestry terrorists
lurking within the homeland, and to prepare for wars overseas. He
encouraged large corporations friendly to him to acquire media outlets
and other industrial concerns across the nation, particularly those
previously owned by suspicious people of Middle Eastern ancestry. He
built powerful alliances with industry; one corporate ally got the
lucrative contract worth millions to build the first large-scale
detention center for enemies of the state. Soon more would follow.
Industry flourished.

He also reached out to the churches, declaring that the nation had clear
Christian roots, that any nation that didn't openly support religion was
morally bankrupt, and that his administration would openly and proudly
provide both moral and financial support to initiatives based on faith
to provide social services.

In this, he was reaching back to his own embrace of Christianity, which
he noted in an April 12, 1922 speech:

"My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a
fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only
by a few followers ... was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter.

"In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the
passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized
the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders...

"As a Christian ... I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and
justice..."

When he later survived an assassination attempt, he said, "Now I am
completely content. The fact that I left the Burgerbraukeller earlier
than usual is a corroboration of Providence's intention to let me reach
my goal."

Many government functions started with prayer. Every school day started
with prayer and every child heard the wonders of Christianity and -
especially - the Ten Commandments in school. The leader even ended many
of his speeches with a prayer, as he did in a February 20, 1938 speech
before Parliament:

"In this hour I would ask of the Lord God only this: that, as in
the past, so in the years to come He would give His blessing to our work
and our action, to our judgment and our resolution, that He will
safeguard us from all false pride and from all cowardly servility, that
He may grant us to find the straight path which His Providence has
ordained for the German people, and that He may ever give us the courage
to do the right, never to falter, never to yield before any violence,
before any danger."

But after an interval of peace following the terrorist attack, voices of
dissent again arose within and without the government. Students had
started an active program opposing him (later known as the White Rose
Society), and leaders of nearby nations were speaking out against his
bellicose rhetoric. He needed a diversion, something to direct people
away from the corporate cronyism being exposed in his own government,
questions of his possibly illegitimate rise to power, his corruption of
religious leaders, and the oft-voiced concerns of civil libertarians
about the people being held in detention without due process or access
to attorneys or family.

With his number two man - a master at manipulating the media - he began
a campaign to convince the people of the nation that a small, limited
war was necessary. Another nation was harboring many of the suspicious
Middle Eastern people, and even though its connection with the terrorist
who had set afire the nation's most important building was tenuous at
best, it held resources their nation badly needed if they were to have
room to live and maintain their prosperity.

He called a press conference and publicly delivered an ultimatum to the
leader of the other nation, provoking an international uproar. He
claimed the right to strike preemptively in self-defense, and nations
across Europe - at first - denounced him for it, pointing out that it
was a doctrine only claimed in the past by nations seeking worldwide
empire, like Caesar's Rome or Alexander's Greece.

It took a few months, and intense international debate and lobbying with
European nations, but, after he personally met with the leader of the
United Kingdom, finally a deal was struck. After the military action
began, Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain told the nervous British
people that giving in to this leader's new first-strike doctrine would
bring "peace for our time." Thus Hitler annexed Austria in a lightning
move, riding a wave of popular support as leaders so often do in times
of war. The Austrian government was unseated and replaced by a new
leadership friendly to Germany, and German corporations began to take
over Austrian resources.

In a speech responding to critics of the invasion, Hitler said, "Certain
foreign newspapers have said that we fell on Austria with brutal
methods. I can only say; even in death they cannot stop lying. I have in
the course of my political struggle won much love from my people, but
when I crossed the former frontier [into Austria] there met me such a
stream of love as I have never experienced. Not as tyrants have we come,
but as liberators."

To deal with those who dissented from his policies, at the advice of his
politically savvy advisors, he and his handmaidens in the press began a
campaign to equate him and his policies with patriotism and the nation
itself. National unity was essential, they said, to ensure that the
terrorists or their sponsors didn't think they'd succeeded in splitting
the nation or weakening its will.

Rather than the government being run by multiple parties in a
pluralistic, democratic fashion, one single party sought total control.
Emulating a technique also used by Stalin, but as ancient as Rome, the
Party used the power of its influence on the government to take over all
government functions, hand out government favors, and reward Party
contributors with government positions and contracts.

In times of war, they said, there could be only "one people, one nation,
and one commander-in-chief" ("Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer"), and so
his advocates in the media began a nationwide campaign charging that
critics of his policies were attacking the nation itself. You were
either with us, or you were with the terrorists.

It was a simplistic perspective, but that was what would work, he was
told by his Propaganda Minister, Joseph Goebbels: "The most brilliant
propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental
principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few
points and repeat them over and over."

Those questioning him were labeled "anti-German" or "not good Germans,"
and it was suggested they were aiding the enemies of the state by
failing in the patriotic necessity of supporting the nation's valiant
men in uniform. It was one of his most effective ways to stifle dissent
and pit wage-earning people (from whom most of the army came) against
the "intellectuals and liberals" who were critical of his policies.

Another technique was to "manufacture news," through the use of paid
shills posing as reporters, seducing real reporters with promises of
access to the leader in exchange for favorable coverage, and thinly
veiled threats to those who exposed his lies. As his Propaganda Minister
said, "It is the absolute right of the State to supervise the formation
of public opinion."

Nonetheless, once the "small war" annexation of Austria was successfully
and quickly completed, and peace returned, voices of opposition were
again raised in the Homeland. The almost-daily release of news bulletins
about the dangers of terrorist communist cells wasn't enough to rouse
the populace and totally suppress dissent. A full-out war was necessary
to divert public attention from the growing rumbles within the country
about disappearing dissidents; violence against liberals, Jews, and
union leaders; and the epidemic of crony capitalism that was producing
empires of wealth in the corporate sector but threatening the middle
class's way of life.

A year later, to the week, Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia.

In the months after that, he claimed that Poland had weapons of mass
destruction (poison gas) and was supporting terrorists against Germany.
Those who doubted that Poland represented a threat were shouted down or
branded as ignorant. Elections were rigged, run by party hacks. Only
loyal Party members were given passes for admission to public events
with the leader, so there would never be a single newsreel of a heckler,
and no doubt in the minds of the people that the leader enjoyed vast
support.

And his support did grow, as Propaganda Minister Goebbels' dictum bore
fruit:

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will
eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such
time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic
and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally
important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for
the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the
truth is the greatest enemy of the State."

Within a few months Poland, too, was invaded in a "defensive,
pre-emptive" action. The nation was now fully at war, and all internal
dissent was suppressed in the name of national security; it was the end
of Germany's first experiment with democracy.

As we conclude this review of history, there are a few milestones worth
remembering.

February 27, 2005, is the 72nd anniversary of Dutch terrorist Marinus
van der Lubbe's successful firebombing of the German Parliament
(Reichstag) building, the terrorist act that catapulted Hitler to
legitimacy and reshaped the German constitution. By the time of his
successful and brief action to seize Austria, in which almost no German
blood was shed, Hitler was the most beloved and popular leader in the
history of his nation. Hailed around the world, he was later Time
magazine's "Man Of The Year."

Most Americans remember his office for the security of the homeland,
known as the Reichssicherheitshauptamt and its SchutzStaffel, simply by
its most famous agency's initials: the SS.

We also remember that the Germans developed a new form of highly violent
warfare they named "lightning war" or blitzkrieg, which, while
generating devastating civilian losses, also produced a highly desirable
"shock and awe" among the nation's leadership according to the authors
of the 1996 book "Shock And Awe" published by the National Defense
University Press.

Reflecting on that time, The American Heritage Dictionary (Houghton
Mifflin Company, 1983) left us this definition of the form of government
the German democracy had become through Hitler's close alliance with the
largest German corporations and his policy of using religion and war as
tools to keep power: "fas-cism (fâsh'iz'em) n. A system of government
that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through
the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent
nationalism."

Today, as we face financial and political crises, it's useful to
remember that the ravages of the Great Depression hit Germany and the
United States alike. Through the 1930s, however, Hitler and Roosevelt
chose very different courses to bring their nations back to power and
prosperity.

Germany's response was to use government to empower corporations and
reward the society's richest individuals, privatize much of the commons,
stifle dissent, strip people of constitutional rights, bust up unions,
and create an illusion of prosperity through government debt and
continual and ever-expanding war spending.

America passed minimum wage laws to raise the middle class, enforced
anti-trust laws to diminish the power of corporations, increased taxes
on corporations and the wealthiest individuals, created Social Security,
and became the employer of last resort through programs to build
national infrastructure, promote the arts, and replant forests.

To the extent that our Constitution is still intact, the choice is again
ours.

There's no way you've had time to read all this!

Shame on you, you're just trying to use up all the bandwidth.



On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:23:59 GMT, "Jim," wrote:

Thom Hartmann: 'When democracy failed - 2005: The warnings of history'
Posted on Thursday, February 24 @ 09:57:56 EST By Thom Hartmann, Common
Dreams

This weekend - February 27th - is the 72nd anniversary, but the
corporate media most likely won't cover it. The generation that
experienced this history firsthand is now largely dead, and only a few
of us dare hear their ghosts.

It started when the government, in the midst of an economic crisis,
received reports of an imminent terrorist attack. A foreign ideologue
had launched feeble attacks on a few famous buildings, but the media
largely ignored his relatively small efforts. The intelligence services
knew, however, that the odds were he would eventually succeed.
(Historians are still arguing whether or not rogue elements in the
intelligence service helped the terrorist. Some, like Sefton Delmer - a
London Daily Express reporter on the scene - say they certainly did not,
while others, like William Shirer, suggest they did.)

But the warnings of investigators were ignored at the highest levels, in
part because the government was distracted; the man who claimed to be
the nation's leader had not been elected by a majority vote and the
majority of citizens claimed he had no right to the powers he coveted.



He was a simpleton, some said, a cartoon character of a man who saw
things in black-and-white terms and didn't have the intellect to
understand the subtleties of running a nation in a complex and
internationalist world.

His coarse use of language - reflecting his political roots in a
southernmost state - and his simplistic and often-inflammatory
nationalistic rhetoric offended the aristocrats, foreign leaders, and
the well-educated elite in the government and media. And, as a young
man, he'd joined a secret society with an occult-sounding name and
bizarre initiation rituals that involved skulls and human bones.

Nonetheless, he knew the terrorist was going to strike (although he
didn't know where or when), and he had already considered his response.
When an aide brought him word that the nation's most prestigious
building was ablaze, he verified it was the terrorist who had struck and
then rushed to the scene and called a press conference.

"You are now witnessing the beginning of a great epoch in history," he
proclaimed, standing in front of the burned-out building, surrounded by
national media. "This fire," he said, his voice trembling with emotion,
"is the beginning." He used the occasion - "a sign from God," he called
it - to declare an all-out war on terrorism and its ideological
sponsors, a people, he said, who traced their origins to the Middle East
and found motivation for their evil deeds in their religion.

Two weeks later, the first detention center for terrorists was built in
Oranianberg to hold the first suspected allies of the infamous
terrorist. In a national outburst of patriotism, the leader's flag was
everywhere, even printed large in newspapers suitable for window display.

Within four weeks of the terrorist attack, the nation's now-popular
leader had pushed through legislation - in the name of combating
terrorism and fighting the philosophy he said spawned it - that
suspended constitutional guarantees of free speech, privacy, and habeas
corpus. Police could now intercept mail and wiretap phones; suspected
terrorists could be imprisoned without specific charges and without
access to their lawyers; police could sneak into people's homes without
warrants if the cases involved terrorism.

To get his patriotic "Decree on the Protection of People and State"
passed over the objections of concerned legislators and civil
libertarians, he agreed to put a 4-year sunset provision on it: if the
national emergency provoked by the terrorist attack was over by then,
the freedoms and rights would be returned to the people, and the police
agencies would be re-restrained. Legislators would later say they hadn't
had time to read the bill before voting on it.

Immediately after passage of the anti-terrorism act, his federal police
agencies stepped up their program of arresting suspicious persons and
holding them without access to lawyers or courts. In the first year only
a few hundred were interred, and those who objected were largely ignored
by the mainstream press, which was afraid to offend and thus lose access
to a leader with such high popularity ratings. Citizens who protested
the leader in public - and there were many - quickly found themselves
confronting the newly empowered police's batons, gas, and jail cells, or
fenced off in protest zones safely out of earshot of the leader's public
speeches. (In the meantime, he was taking almost daily lessons in public
speaking, learning to control his tonality, gestures, and facial
expressions. He became a very competent orator.)

Within the first months after that terrorist attack, at the suggestion
of a political advisor, he brought a formerly obscure word into common
usage. He wanted to stir a "racial pride" among his countrymen, so,
instead of referring to the nation by its name, he began to refer to it
as "The Homeland," a phrase publicly promoted in the introduction to a
1934 speech recorded in Leni Riefenstahl's famous propaganda movie
"Triumph Of The Will." As hoped, people's hearts swelled with pride, and
the beginning of an us-versus-them mentality was sewn. Our land was
"the" homeland, citizens thought: all others were simply foreign lands.
We are the "true people," he suggested, the only ones worthy of our
nation's concern; if bombs fall on others, or human rights are violated
in other nations and it makes our lives better, it's of little concern
to us.

Playing on this new implicitly racial nationalism, and exploiting a
disagreement with the French over his increasing militarism, he argued
that any international body that didn't act first and foremost in the
best interest of his own nation was neither relevant nor useful. He thus
withdrew his country from the League Of Nations in October, 1933, and
then negotiated a separate naval armaments agreement with Anthony Eden
of The United Kingdom to create a worldwide military ruling elite.

His propaganda minister orchestrated a campaign to ensure the people
that he was a deeply religious man and that his motivations were rooted
in Christianity. He even proclaimed the need for a revival of the
Christian faith across his nation, what he called a "New Christianity."
Every man in his rapidly growing army wore a belt buckle that declared
"Gott Mit Uns" - God Is With Us - and most of them fervently believed it
was true.

Within a year of the terrorist attack, the nation's leader determined
that the various local police and federal agencies around the nation
were lacking the clear communication and overall coordinated
administration necessary to deal with the terrorist threat facing the
nation, particularly those citizens who were of Middle Eastern ancestry
and thus probably terrorist and communist sympathizers, and various
troublesome "intellectuals" and "liberals." He proposed a single new
national agency to protect the security of the homeland, consolidating
the actions of dozens of previously independent police, border, and
investigative agencies under a single leader.

He appointed one of his most trusted associates to be leader of this new
agency, the Central Security Office for the homeland, and gave it a role
in the government equal to the other major departments.

His assistant who dealt with the press noted that, since the terrorist
attack, "Radio and press are at out disposal." Those voices questioning
the legitimacy of their nation's leader, or raising questions about his
checkered past, had by now faded from the public's recollection as his
central security office began advertising a program encouraging people
to phone in tips about suspicious neighbors. This program was so
successful that the names of some of the people "denounced" were soon
being broadcast on radio stations. Those denounced often included
opposition politicians and news reporters who dared speak out - a
favorite target of his regime and the media he now controlled through
intimidation and ownership by corporate allies.

To consolidate his power, he concluded that government alone wasn't
enough. He reached out to industry and forged an alliance, bringing
former executives of the nation's largest corporations into high
government positions. A flood of government money poured into corporate
coffers to fight the war against the Middle Eastern ancestry terrorists
lurking within the homeland, and to prepare for wars overseas. He
encouraged large corporations friendly to him to acquire media outlets
and other industrial concerns across the nation, particularly those
previously owned by suspicious people of Middle Eastern ancestry. He
built powerful alliances with industry; one corporate ally got the
lucrative contract worth millions to build the first large-scale
detention center for enemies of the state. Soon more would follow.
Industry flourished.

He also reached out to the churches, declaring that the nation had clear
Christian roots, that any nation that didn't openly support religion was
morally bankrupt, and that his administration would openly and proudly
provide both moral and financial support to initiatives based on faith
to provide social services.

In this, he was reaching back to his own embrace of Christianity, which
he noted in an April 12, 1922 speech:

"My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a
fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only
by a few followers ... was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter.

"In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the
passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized
the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders...

"As a Christian ... I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and
justice..."

When he later survived an assassination attempt, he said, "Now I am
completely content. The fact that I left the Burgerbraukeller earlier
than usual is a corroboration of Providence's intention to let me reach
my goal."

Many government functions started with prayer. Every school day started
with prayer and every child heard the wonders of Christianity and -
especially - the Ten Commandments in school. The leader even ended many
of his speeches with a prayer, as he did in a February 20, 1938 speech
before Parliament:

"In this hour I would ask of the Lord God only this: that, as in
the past, so in the years to come He would give His blessing to our work
and our action, to our judgment and our resolution, that He will
safeguard us from all false pride and from all cowardly servility, that
He may grant us to find the straight path which His Providence has
ordained for the German people, and that He may ever give us the courage
to do the right, never to falter, never to yield before any violence,
before any danger."

But after an interval of peace following the terrorist attack, voices of
dissent again arose within and without the government. Students had
started an active program opposing him (later known as the White Rose
Society), and leaders of nearby nations were speaking out against his
bellicose rhetoric. He needed a diversion, something to direct people
away from the corporate cronyism being exposed in his own government,
questions of his possibly illegitimate rise to power, his corruption of
religious leaders, and the oft-voiced concerns of civil libertarians
about the people being held in detention without due process or access
to attorneys or family.

With his number two man - a master at manipulating the media - he began
a campaign to convince the people of the nation that a small, limited
war was necessary. Another nation was harboring many of the suspicious
Middle Eastern people, and even though its connection with the terrorist
who had set afire the nation's most important building was tenuous at
best, it held resources their nation badly needed if they were to have
room to live and maintain their prosperity.

He called a press conference and publicly delivered an ultimatum to the
leader of the other nation, provoking an international uproar. He
claimed the right to strike preemptively in self-defense, and nations
across Europe - at first - denounced him for it, pointing out that it
was a doctrine only claimed in the past by nations seeking worldwide
empire, like Caesar's Rome or Alexander's Greece.

It took a few months, and intense international debate and lobbying with
European nations, but, after he personally met with the leader of the
United Kingdom, finally a deal was struck. After the military action
began, Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain told the nervous British
people that giving in to this leader's new first-strike doctrine would
bring "peace for our time." Thus Hitler annexed Austria in a lightning
move, riding a wave of popular support as leaders so often do in times
of war. The Austrian government was unseated and replaced by a new
leadership friendly to Germany, and German corporations began to take
over Austrian resources.

In a speech responding to critics of the invasion, Hitler said, "Certain
foreign newspapers have said that we fell on Austria with brutal
methods. I can only say; even in death they cannot stop lying. I have in
the course of my political struggle won much love from my people, but
when I crossed the former frontier [into Austria] there met me such a
stream of love as I have never experienced. Not as tyrants have we come,
but as liberators."

To deal with those who dissented from his policies, at the advice of his
politically savvy advisors, he and his handmaidens in the press began a
campaign to equate him and his policies with patriotism and the nation
itself. National unity was essential, they said, to ensure that the
terrorists or their sponsors didn't think they'd succeeded in splitting
the nation or weakening its will.

Rather than the government being run by multiple parties in a
pluralistic, democratic fashion, one single party sought total control.
Emulating a technique also used by Stalin, but as ancient as Rome, the
Party used the power of its influence on the government to take over all
government functions, hand out government favors, and reward Party
contributors with government positions and contracts.

In times of war, they said, there could be only "one people, one nation,
and one commander-in-chief" ("Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer"), and so
his advocates in the media began a nationwide campaign charging that
critics of his policies were attacking the nation itself. You were
either with us, or you were with the terrorists.

It was a simplistic perspective, but that was what would work, he was
told by his Propaganda Minister, Joseph Goebbels: "The most brilliant
propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental
principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few
points and repeat them over and over."

Those questioning him were labeled "anti-German" or "not good Germans,"
and it was suggested they were aiding the enemies of the state by
failing in the patriotic necessity of supporting the nation's valiant
men in uniform. It was one of his most effective ways to stifle dissent
and pit wage-earning people (from whom most of the army came) against
the "intellectuals and liberals" who were critical of his policies.

Another technique was to "manufacture news," through the use of paid
shills posing as reporters, seducing real reporters with promises of
access to the leader in exchange for favorable coverage, and thinly
veiled threats to those who exposed his lies. As his Propaganda Minister
said, "It is the absolute right of the State to supervise the formation
of public opinion."

Nonetheless, once the "small war" annexation of Austria was successfully
and quickly completed, and peace returned, voices of opposition were
again raised in the Homeland. The almost-daily release of news bulletins
about the dangers of terrorist communist cells wasn't enough to rouse
the populace and totally suppress dissent. A full-out war was necessary
to divert public attention from the growing rumbles within the country
about disappearing dissidents; violence against liberals, Jews, and
union leaders; and the epidemic of crony capitalism that was producing
empires of wealth in the corporate sector but threatening the middle
class's way of life.

A year later, to the week, Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia.

In the months after that, he claimed that Poland had weapons of mass
destruction (poison gas) and was supporting terrorists against Germany.
Those who doubted that Poland represented a threat were shouted down or
branded as ignorant. Elections were rigged, run by party hacks. Only
loyal Party members were given passes for admission to public events
with the leader, so there would never be a single newsreel of a heckler,
and no doubt in the minds of the people that the leader enjoyed vast
support.

And his support did grow, as Propaganda Minister Goebbels' dictum bore
fruit:

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will
eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such
time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic
and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally
important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for
the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the
truth is the greatest enemy of the State."

Within a few months Poland, too, was invaded in a "defensive,
pre-emptive" action. The nation was now fully at war, and all internal
dissent was suppressed in the name of national security; it was the end
of Germany's first experiment with democracy.

As we conclude this review of history, there are a few milestones worth
remembering.

February 27, 2005, is the 72nd anniversary of Dutch terrorist Marinus
van der Lubbe's successful firebombing of the German Parliament
(Reichstag) building, the terrorist act that catapulted Hitler to
legitimacy and reshaped the German constitution. By the time of his
successful and brief action to seize Austria, in which almost no German
blood was shed, Hitler was the most beloved and popular leader in the
history of his nation. Hailed around the world, he was later Time
magazine's "Man Of The Year."

Most Americans remember his office for the security of the homeland,
known as the Reichssicherheitshauptamt and its SchutzStaffel, simply by
its most famous agency's initials: the SS.

We also remember that the Germans developed a new form of highly violent
warfare they named "lightning war" or blitzkrieg, which, while
generating devastating civilian losses, also produced a highly desirable
"shock and awe" among the nation's leadership according to the authors
of the 1996 book "Shock And Awe" published by the National Defense
University Press.

Reflecting on that time, The American Heritage Dictionary (Houghton
Mifflin Company, 1983) left us this definition of the form of government
the German democracy had become through Hitler's close alliance with the
largest German corporations and his policy of using religion and war as
tools to keep power: "fas-cism (fâsh'iz'em) n. A system of government
that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through
the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent
nationalism."

Today, as we face financial and political crises, it's useful to
remember that the ravages of the Great Depression hit Germany and the
United States alike. Through the 1930s, however, Hitler and Roosevelt
chose very different courses to bring their nations back to power and
prosperity.

Germany's response was to use government to empower corporations and
reward the society's richest individuals, privatize much of the commons,
stifle dissent, strip people of constitutional rights, bust up unions,
and create an illusion of prosperity through government debt and
continual and ever-expanding war spending.

America passed minimum wage laws to raise the middle class, enforced
anti-trust laws to diminish the power of corporations, increased taxes
on corporations and the wealthiest individuals, created Social Security,
and became the employer of last resort through programs to build
national infrastructure, promote the arts, and replant forests.

To the extent that our Constitution is still intact, the choice is again
ours.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"John H" wrote in message
...
There's no way you've had time to read all this!

Shame on you, you're just trying to use up all the bandwidth.

I wonder when the liebrals will get over their bush-hitler routine, it
hasn't worked, just like the rest of their plans, and makes them look like
fools.




On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:23:59 GMT, "Jim," wrote:

Thom Hartmann: 'When democracy failed - 2005: The warnings of history'
Posted on Thursday, February 24 @ 09:57:56 EST By Thom Hartmann, Common
Dreams

This weekend - February 27th - is the 72nd anniversary, but the
corporate media most likely won't cover it. The generation that
experienced this history firsthand is now largely dead, and only a few
of us dare hear their ghosts.

It started when the government, in the midst of an economic crisis,
received reports of an imminent terrorist attack. A foreign ideologue
had launched feeble attacks on a few famous buildings, but the media
largely ignored his relatively small efforts. The intelligence services
knew, however, that the odds were he would eventually succeed.
(Historians are still arguing whether or not rogue elements in the
intelligence service helped the terrorist. Some, like Sefton Delmer - a
London Daily Express reporter on the scene - say they certainly did not,
while others, like William Shirer, suggest they did.)

But the warnings of investigators were ignored at the highest levels, in
part because the government was distracted; the man who claimed to be
the nation's leader had not been elected by a majority vote and the
majority of citizens claimed he had no right to the powers he coveted.



He was a simpleton, some said, a cartoon character of a man who saw
things in black-and-white terms and didn't have the intellect to
understand the subtleties of running a nation in a complex and
internationalist world.

His coarse use of language - reflecting his political roots in a
southernmost state - and his simplistic and often-inflammatory
nationalistic rhetoric offended the aristocrats, foreign leaders, and
the well-educated elite in the government and media. And, as a young
man, he'd joined a secret society with an occult-sounding name and
bizarre initiation rituals that involved skulls and human bones.

Nonetheless, he knew the terrorist was going to strike (although he
didn't know where or when), and he had already considered his response.
When an aide brought him word that the nation's most prestigious
building was ablaze, he verified it was the terrorist who had struck and
then rushed to the scene and called a press conference.

"You are now witnessing the beginning of a great epoch in history," he
proclaimed, standing in front of the burned-out building, surrounded by
national media. "This fire," he said, his voice trembling with emotion,
"is the beginning." He used the occasion - "a sign from God," he called
it - to declare an all-out war on terrorism and its ideological
sponsors, a people, he said, who traced their origins to the Middle East
and found motivation for their evil deeds in their religion.

Two weeks later, the first detention center for terrorists was built in
Oranianberg to hold the first suspected allies of the infamous
terrorist. In a national outburst of patriotism, the leader's flag was
everywhere, even printed large in newspapers suitable for window
display.

Within four weeks of the terrorist attack, the nation's now-popular
leader had pushed through legislation - in the name of combating
terrorism and fighting the philosophy he said spawned it - that
suspended constitutional guarantees of free speech, privacy, and habeas
corpus. Police could now intercept mail and wiretap phones; suspected
terrorists could be imprisoned without specific charges and without
access to their lawyers; police could sneak into people's homes without
warrants if the cases involved terrorism.

To get his patriotic "Decree on the Protection of People and State"
passed over the objections of concerned legislators and civil
libertarians, he agreed to put a 4-year sunset provision on it: if the
national emergency provoked by the terrorist attack was over by then,
the freedoms and rights would be returned to the people, and the police
agencies would be re-restrained. Legislators would later say they hadn't
had time to read the bill before voting on it.

Immediately after passage of the anti-terrorism act, his federal police
agencies stepped up their program of arresting suspicious persons and
holding them without access to lawyers or courts. In the first year only
a few hundred were interred, and those who objected were largely ignored
by the mainstream press, which was afraid to offend and thus lose access
to a leader with such high popularity ratings. Citizens who protested
the leader in public - and there were many - quickly found themselves
confronting the newly empowered police's batons, gas, and jail cells, or
fenced off in protest zones safely out of earshot of the leader's public
speeches. (In the meantime, he was taking almost daily lessons in public
speaking, learning to control his tonality, gestures, and facial
expressions. He became a very competent orator.)

Within the first months after that terrorist attack, at the suggestion
of a political advisor, he brought a formerly obscure word into common
usage. He wanted to stir a "racial pride" among his countrymen, so,
instead of referring to the nation by its name, he began to refer to it
as "The Homeland," a phrase publicly promoted in the introduction to a
1934 speech recorded in Leni Riefenstahl's famous propaganda movie
"Triumph Of The Will." As hoped, people's hearts swelled with pride, and
the beginning of an us-versus-them mentality was sewn. Our land was
"the" homeland, citizens thought: all others were simply foreign lands.
We are the "true people," he suggested, the only ones worthy of our
nation's concern; if bombs fall on others, or human rights are violated
in other nations and it makes our lives better, it's of little concern
to us.

Playing on this new implicitly racial nationalism, and exploiting a
disagreement with the French over his increasing militarism, he argued
that any international body that didn't act first and foremost in the
best interest of his own nation was neither relevant nor useful. He thus
withdrew his country from the League Of Nations in October, 1933, and
then negotiated a separate naval armaments agreement with Anthony Eden
of The United Kingdom to create a worldwide military ruling elite.

His propaganda minister orchestrated a campaign to ensure the people
that he was a deeply religious man and that his motivations were rooted
in Christianity. He even proclaimed the need for a revival of the
Christian faith across his nation, what he called a "New Christianity."
Every man in his rapidly growing army wore a belt buckle that declared
"Gott Mit Uns" - God Is With Us - and most of them fervently believed it
was true.

Within a year of the terrorist attack, the nation's leader determined
that the various local police and federal agencies around the nation
were lacking the clear communication and overall coordinated
administration necessary to deal with the terrorist threat facing the
nation, particularly those citizens who were of Middle Eastern ancestry
and thus probably terrorist and communist sympathizers, and various
troublesome "intellectuals" and "liberals." He proposed a single new
national agency to protect the security of the homeland, consolidating
the actions of dozens of previously independent police, border, and
investigative agencies under a single leader.

He appointed one of his most trusted associates to be leader of this new
agency, the Central Security Office for the homeland, and gave it a role
in the government equal to the other major departments.

His assistant who dealt with the press noted that, since the terrorist
attack, "Radio and press are at out disposal." Those voices questioning
the legitimacy of their nation's leader, or raising questions about his
checkered past, had by now faded from the public's recollection as his
central security office began advertising a program encouraging people
to phone in tips about suspicious neighbors. This program was so
successful that the names of some of the people "denounced" were soon
being broadcast on radio stations. Those denounced often included
opposition politicians and news reporters who dared speak out - a
favorite target of his regime and the media he now controlled through
intimidation and ownership by corporate allies.

To consolidate his power, he concluded that government alone wasn't
enough. He reached out to industry and forged an alliance, bringing
former executives of the nation's largest corporations into high
government positions. A flood of government money poured into corporate
coffers to fight the war against the Middle Eastern ancestry terrorists
lurking within the homeland, and to prepare for wars overseas. He
encouraged large corporations friendly to him to acquire media outlets
and other industrial concerns across the nation, particularly those
previously owned by suspicious people of Middle Eastern ancestry. He
built powerful alliances with industry; one corporate ally got the
lucrative contract worth millions to build the first large-scale
detention center for enemies of the state. Soon more would follow.
Industry flourished.

He also reached out to the churches, declaring that the nation had clear
Christian roots, that any nation that didn't openly support religion was
morally bankrupt, and that his administration would openly and proudly
provide both moral and financial support to initiatives based on faith
to provide social services.

In this, he was reaching back to his own embrace of Christianity, which
he noted in an April 12, 1922 speech:

"My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a
fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only
by a few followers ... was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter.

"In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the
passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized
the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders...

"As a Christian ... I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and
justice..."

When he later survived an assassination attempt, he said, "Now I am
completely content. The fact that I left the Burgerbraukeller earlier
than usual is a corroboration of Providence's intention to let me reach
my goal."

Many government functions started with prayer. Every school day started
with prayer and every child heard the wonders of Christianity and -
especially - the Ten Commandments in school. The leader even ended many
of his speeches with a prayer, as he did in a February 20, 1938 speech
before Parliament:

"In this hour I would ask of the Lord God only this: that, as in
the past, so in the years to come He would give His blessing to our work
and our action, to our judgment and our resolution, that He will
safeguard us from all false pride and from all cowardly servility, that
He may grant us to find the straight path which His Providence has
ordained for the German people, and that He may ever give us the courage
to do the right, never to falter, never to yield before any violence,
before any danger."

But after an interval of peace following the terrorist attack, voices of
dissent again arose within and without the government. Students had
started an active program opposing him (later known as the White Rose
Society), and leaders of nearby nations were speaking out against his
bellicose rhetoric. He needed a diversion, something to direct people
away from the corporate cronyism being exposed in his own government,
questions of his possibly illegitimate rise to power, his corruption of
religious leaders, and the oft-voiced concerns of civil libertarians
about the people being held in detention without due process or access
to attorneys or family.

With his number two man - a master at manipulating the media - he began
a campaign to convince the people of the nation that a small, limited
war was necessary. Another nation was harboring many of the suspicious
Middle Eastern people, and even though its connection with the terrorist
who had set afire the nation's most important building was tenuous at
best, it held resources their nation badly needed if they were to have
room to live and maintain their prosperity.

He called a press conference and publicly delivered an ultimatum to the
leader of the other nation, provoking an international uproar. He
claimed the right to strike preemptively in self-defense, and nations
across Europe - at first - denounced him for it, pointing out that it
was a doctrine only claimed in the past by nations seeking worldwide
empire, like Caesar's Rome or Alexander's Greece.

It took a few months, and intense international debate and lobbying with
European nations, but, after he personally met with the leader of the
United Kingdom, finally a deal was struck. After the military action
began, Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain told the nervous British
people that giving in to this leader's new first-strike doctrine would
bring "peace for our time." Thus Hitler annexed Austria in a lightning
move, riding a wave of popular support as leaders so often do in times
of war. The Austrian government was unseated and replaced by a new
leadership friendly to Germany, and German corporations began to take
over Austrian resources.

In a speech responding to critics of the invasion, Hitler said, "Certain
foreign newspapers have said that we fell on Austria with brutal
methods. I can only say; even in death they cannot stop lying. I have in
the course of my political struggle won much love from my people, but
when I crossed the former frontier [into Austria] there met me such a
stream of love as I have never experienced. Not as tyrants have we come,
but as liberators."

To deal with those who dissented from his policies, at the advice of his
politically savvy advisors, he and his handmaidens in the press began a
campaign to equate him and his policies with patriotism and the nation
itself. National unity was essential, they said, to ensure that the
terrorists or their sponsors didn't think they'd succeeded in splitting
the nation or weakening its will.

Rather than the government being run by multiple parties in a
pluralistic, democratic fashion, one single party sought total control.
Emulating a technique also used by Stalin, but as ancient as Rome, the
Party used the power of its influence on the government to take over all
government functions, hand out government favors, and reward Party
contributors with government positions and contracts.

In times of war, they said, there could be only "one people, one nation,
and one commander-in-chief" ("Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer"), and so
his advocates in the media began a nationwide campaign charging that
critics of his policies were attacking the nation itself. You were
either with us, or you were with the terrorists.

It was a simplistic perspective, but that was what would work, he was
told by his Propaganda Minister, Joseph Goebbels: "The most brilliant
propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental
principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few
points and repeat them over and over."

Those questioning him were labeled "anti-German" or "not good Germans,"
and it was suggested they were aiding the enemies of the state by
failing in the patriotic necessity of supporting the nation's valiant
men in uniform. It was one of his most effective ways to stifle dissent
and pit wage-earning people (from whom most of the army came) against
the "intellectuals and liberals" who were critical of his policies.

Another technique was to "manufacture news," through the use of paid
shills posing as reporters, seducing real reporters with promises of
access to the leader in exchange for favorable coverage, and thinly
veiled threats to those who exposed his lies. As his Propaganda Minister
said, "It is the absolute right of the State to supervise the formation
of public opinion."

Nonetheless, once the "small war" annexation of Austria was successfully
and quickly completed, and peace returned, voices of opposition were
again raised in the Homeland. The almost-daily release of news bulletins
about the dangers of terrorist communist cells wasn't enough to rouse
the populace and totally suppress dissent. A full-out war was necessary
to divert public attention from the growing rumbles within the country
about disappearing dissidents; violence against liberals, Jews, and
union leaders; and the epidemic of crony capitalism that was producing
empires of wealth in the corporate sector but threatening the middle
class's way of life.

A year later, to the week, Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia.

In the months after that, he claimed that Poland had weapons of mass
destruction (poison gas) and was supporting terrorists against Germany.
Those who doubted that Poland represented a threat were shouted down or
branded as ignorant. Elections were rigged, run by party hacks. Only
loyal Party members were given passes for admission to public events
with the leader, so there would never be a single newsreel of a heckler,
and no doubt in the minds of the people that the leader enjoyed vast
support.

And his support did grow, as Propaganda Minister Goebbels' dictum bore
fruit:

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will
eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such
time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic
and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally
important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for
the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the
truth is the greatest enemy of the State."

Within a few months Poland, too, was invaded in a "defensive,
pre-emptive" action. The nation was now fully at war, and all internal
dissent was suppressed in the name of national security; it was the end
of Germany's first experiment with democracy.

As we conclude this review of history, there are a few milestones worth
remembering.

February 27, 2005, is the 72nd anniversary of Dutch terrorist Marinus
van der Lubbe's successful firebombing of the German Parliament
(Reichstag) building, the terrorist act that catapulted Hitler to
legitimacy and reshaped the German constitution. By the time of his
successful and brief action to seize Austria, in which almost no German
blood was shed, Hitler was the most beloved and popular leader in the
history of his nation. Hailed around the world, he was later Time
magazine's "Man Of The Year."

Most Americans remember his office for the security of the homeland,
known as the Reichssicherheitshauptamt and its SchutzStaffel, simply by
its most famous agency's initials: the SS.

We also remember that the Germans developed a new form of highly violent
warfare they named "lightning war" or blitzkrieg, which, while
generating devastating civilian losses, also produced a highly desirable
"shock and awe" among the nation's leadership according to the authors
of the 1996 book "Shock And Awe" published by the National Defense
University Press.

Reflecting on that time, The American Heritage Dictionary (Houghton
Mifflin Company, 1983) left us this definition of the form of government
the German democracy had become through Hitler's close alliance with the
largest German corporations and his policy of using religion and war as
tools to keep power: "fas-cism (fâsh'iz'em) n. A system of government
that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through
the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent
nationalism."

Today, as we face financial and political crises, it's useful to
remember that the ravages of the Great Depression hit Germany and the
United States alike. Through the 1930s, however, Hitler and Roosevelt
chose very different courses to bring their nations back to power and
prosperity.

Germany's response was to use government to empower corporations and
reward the society's richest individuals, privatize much of the commons,
stifle dissent, strip people of constitutional rights, bust up unions,
and create an illusion of prosperity through government debt and
continual and ever-expanding war spending.

America passed minimum wage laws to raise the middle class, enforced
anti-trust laws to diminish the power of corporations, increased taxes
on corporations and the wealthiest individuals, created Social Security,
and became the employer of last resort through programs to build
national infrastructure, promote the arts, and replant forests.

To the extent that our Constitution is still intact, the choice is again
ours.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary
to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:50:25 -0500, "P. Fritz"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
There's no way you've had time to read all this!

Shame on you, you're just trying to use up all the bandwidth.

I wonder when the liebrals will get over their bush-hitler routine, it
hasn't worked, just like the rest of their plans, and makes them look like
fools.

Yup. It surely does.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes