"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Jim," wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...

P.Fritz wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
om...


On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:20:20 GMT, "Jim," wrote:



John H wrote:


On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:46:47 GMT, "Jim,"
wrote:




GANNONGATE -- MAINSTREAM MEDIA BLACKOUT: It's a story flush with
intrigue -- CIA secrets, White House malfeasance, hidden
identities,
even male prostitution. Yet, as Salon.com's Eric Boehlert
describes, the
serious questions surrounding White House "reporter" Jeff Gannon
(http://www.americanprogressaction.or...P7H&b=387763#2)
have received only scant coverage in the mainstream media; two of
the
broadcast television networks, "as well as scores of major
metropolitan
newspapers around the country, have completely ignored it
(http://salon.com/news/feature/2005/0...age/index.html)
."
And evidence of a double standard is plentiful. Just two months
ago,
"virtually every major news outlet" covered a similar (yet far less
egregious) story involving Edward Lee Pitts, the Tennessee reporter
"who
helped a National Guardsman craft a tough question posed to
Secretary
Rumsfeld regarding the lack of body armor for U.S. soldiers
fighting in
Iraq."



And......

No one gives a rat's ass!!!

He *did* ask a great question though...

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak
picture of the
U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking
about soup
lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the
economy being
on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that
Social Security
is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to
work -- you've
said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going
to work
with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

I think the above is part of the aforementioned
"White House malfeasance"


John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Your back to the chant John -- How about a little effort trying to
answer the questions raised earlier?

Your questions have no bearing on anything more worthwhile than a
rat's ass.
And, I don't give a rat's ass.

He had as much right to ask a loaded question as any of the
'accredited' liberal
'journalists' did (and do). Watch a few White House briefings and
you'll
understand what I mean.


It is pretty funny watching the liebrals hyperventilate about a 2 bit
reporter, as if it is going to be the lynch pin that brings down Bush.
They haven't learned a thing from their series of electoral defeats.





John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes



A phony 2 bit homosexual reporter........


What does him being homosexual have to do with anything?

Well -- as I recall Republicans have somewhat of an aversion to sex. How
much was it that the republican congress spent "investigating" a BJ for
the Clinton? -- The number 50 MILLION sort of sticks in my mind. Now if
Gannon got a pass for just a BJ - kinda makes you wonder...

That is not an answer. What does him being homosexual have to do with
anything? Are you a homophobe?

The investigation was about perjury, a little factoid that the liebrals
like to ignore, the cost was due to the clinton's obstructing the
investigation.

Poor little liebrals, look what they have left to hang their hats on.