Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #3   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:27:22 -0800, jps wrote:

In article ,
says...

He's the one who asked the only literate question at the press briefing, to wit:

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the
U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup
lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being
on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security
is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've
said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work
with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"


It's surprising Guckert had enough time to attend press briefings with
all the pitching, catching and sucking he had going on.

Quite an entrepreneur. Just the kind Republicans admire most.

Fake ones.

jps


I thought you liberal folks were pushing homosexuality as the only way to go!
Now you're coming down on someone who may be gay.

Y'all need to clean up your act!

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes
  #5   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:16:11 -0800, jps wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:27:22 -0800, jps wrote:

In article ,
says...

He's the one who asked the only literate question at the press briefing, to wit:

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the
U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup
lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being
on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security
is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've
said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work
with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

It's surprising Guckert had enough time to attend press briefings with
all the pitching, catching and sucking he had going on.

Quite an entrepreneur. Just the kind Republicans admire most.

Fake ones.

jps


I thought you liberal folks were pushing homosexuality as the only way to go!
Now you're coming down on someone who may be gay.

Y'all need to clean up your act!


You know that's complete bull****. The point is we don't care if
they're straight or gay, just as long as they have a conscience and are
willing to use it.

Clearly, you aren't.

jps


Oh really? Then why all the comments about Gannon's sexual proclivities?

I just don't understand you the hypocrisy escapes you.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes


  #7   Report Post  
Jim,
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John H wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:25:28 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


jps wrote:

In article ,
says...




Damn, Jimcomma, where did you find an honest article?


More proof that you're a complete ****in' idiot.

She's makin' money off your stupidity as are 1% of the population.

jps


By now, almost everyone's heard of Jeff Gannon/James Guckert. He's the
fake reporter with a false name given all-too-real press credentials by
the White House.



He's the one who asked the only literate question at the press briefing, to wit:

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the
U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup
lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being
on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security
is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've
said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work
with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

You gotta love it!

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes



I note the questions remain

How did Gannon gained access to White House press briefings without any
journalistic qualifications.

HOW LONG CAN JOURNALISTS GAIN ACCESS TO THE WHITE HOUSE WITHOUT AN FBI
BACKGROUND CHECK?


Why did the White House waved him into press briefings for nearly two
years using what's called a day pass.

Is there a limit to how long a reporter can slide on "day" passes, as
Gannon did for years?

HOW DID GANNON GET A WHITE HOUSE PRESS PASS TWO MONTHS BEFORE HIS
SUPPOSED PUBLICATION EVEN EXISTED?

BY WHAT CRITERIA DID THE WHITE HOUSE EVALUATE TALON NEWS?

HOW DID GANNON GET A WHITE HOUSE PRESS PASS UNDER A FAKE NAME?

WHAT ( if any) IS GANNON'S CONNECTION TO THE VALERIE PLAME CASE?

Did his sexual orientation "buy" him any favors from the White House?

Time to live up to your motto John

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary
to resolve it"


  #8   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 03:19:19 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


I note the questions remain

How did Gannon gained access to White House press briefings without any
journalistic qualifications.

HOW LONG CAN JOURNALISTS GAIN ACCESS TO THE WHITE HOUSE WITHOUT AN FBI
BACKGROUND CHECK?


Why did the White House waved him into press briefings for nearly two
years using what's called a day pass.

Is there a limit to how long a reporter can slide on "day" passes, as
Gannon did for years?

HOW DID GANNON GET A WHITE HOUSE PRESS PASS TWO MONTHS BEFORE HIS
SUPPOSED PUBLICATION EVEN EXISTED?

BY WHAT CRITERIA DID THE WHITE HOUSE EVALUATE TALON NEWS?

HOW DID GANNON GET A WHITE HOUSE PRESS PASS UNDER A FAKE NAME?

WHAT ( if any) IS GANNON'S CONNECTION TO THE VALERIE PLAME CASE?

Did his sexual orientation "buy" him any favors from the White House?

Time to live up to your motto John

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary
to resolve it"


There is no 'difficulty' to divide, Jimcomma. No one, except you, gives a rat's
ass about Gannon. The important question to answer is:

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the
U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup
lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being
on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security
is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've
said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work
with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

Don't you just love it? That question kind of says it all, doesn't it. I can see
why some folks just seem to forget it.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes
  #9   Report Post  
thunder
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:26:09 -0500, John H wrote:


There is no 'difficulty' to divide, Jimcomma. No one, except you, gives a
rat's ass about Gannon. The important question to answer is:


You are right, no one should care about Gannon, but you are also wrong.
The important question is: How did someone with inadequate credentials
gain access to the President? The President's security *should* be more
important than any damn question Gannon asked.
  #10   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:50:49 -0500, thunder wrote:

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:26:09 -0500, John H wrote:


There is no 'difficulty' to divide, Jimcomma. No one, except you, gives a
rat's ass about Gannon. The important question to answer is:


You are right, no one should care about Gannon, but you are also wrong.
The important question is: How did someone with inadequate credentials
gain access to the President? The President's security *should* be more
important than any damn question Gannon asked.


I expect there were enough Secret Service folks around to handle any supposed
'security' issues that may have arisen. I find it hard to believe that you
liberals are so suddenly concerned with the 'security' of the president!

No, the important question remains that which you folks and the major media
delete:

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the
U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup
lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being
on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security
is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've
said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work
with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

What a great question!!


John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017