"JimH" wrote in message
...

BTW Chuck....next time you throw an insult at me be man enough to mention
my
name.

I also need to remind you of a rule you set for the forum which you seem
to
constantly break:

Chuck's rule #4. No personal attacks. (I don't want to hear "but Mom, he
started it".)



Yep I broke it....but the guy was well deserving of everything I threw at
him.

But why are *you* breaking your own rule?



This is rich! You have the gall to call another poster on the carpet for
breaking an agreement. I can't decide if you are suffering some kind of
dementia,,or are a natural born liar.

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"JimH" wrote in message
...

BTW Chuck....next time you throw an insult at me be man enough to mention
my
name.

I also need to remind you of a rule you set for the forum which you seem
to
constantly break:

Chuck's rule #4. No personal attacks. (I don't want to hear "but Mom, he
started it".)



Yep I broke it....but the guy was well deserving of everything I threw at
him.

But why are *you* breaking your own rule?



This is rich! You have the gall to call another poster on the carpet for
breaking an agreement. I can't decide if you are suffering some kind of
dementia,,or are a natural born liar.



You obviously missed the point Don....the rule was set by Chucky, not me.
Yes, I broke the rule. But he made the rule, not me, and he broke it.

Understand now?

Good.

Now go back to enjoying your freedoms.....freedoms earned for you by our men
and women in uniform...the same ones you despise.

"JimH" wrote in message
...


You obviously missed the point Don....the rule was set by Chucky, not me.
Yes, I broke the rule. But he made the rule, not me, and he broke it.

Understand now?

Good.

Now go back to enjoying your freedoms.....freedoms earned for you by our
men
and women in uniform...the same ones you despise.



Jim...you know very well I was refering to 'our' agreement.

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"JimH" wrote in message
...


You obviously missed the point Don....the rule was set by Chucky, not me.
Yes, I broke the rule. But he made the rule, not me, and he broke it.

Understand now?

Good.

Now go back to enjoying your freedoms.....freedoms earned for you by our
men
and women in uniform...the same ones you despise.



Jim...you know very well I was refering to 'our' agreement.



Sorry, but you broke it once you started to 'dis our men and women in
uniform.

"JimH" wrote in message
...


Sorry, but you broke it once you started to 'dis our men and women in
uniform.

I see. You're one of those guys who changes the rules as you move along..
I haven't 'dissed' any men or women in uniform...just Bert. I've got two
nieces and a nephew's wife in the Canadian Military. I don't want the family
on my case too...it's bad enough in here.

In article , says...

Now go back to enjoying your freedoms.....freedoms earned for you by our men
and women in uniform...the same ones you despise.

Another simple-minded assertion by JimH.

Black and white worlds are easy to comprehend for the intellectually
challenged.

jps

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:59:34 -0800, jps wrote:

In article , says...

Now go back to enjoying your freedoms.....freedoms earned for you by our men
and women in uniform...the same ones you despise.

Another simple-minded assertion by JimH.

Black and white worlds are easy to comprehend for the intellectually
challenged.

jps

I guess old man Descartes was a pretty binary kind of guy also, huh?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:31:04 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:

I can't decide if you are suffering some kind of
dementia,,or are a natural born liar.

I haven't seen any evidence to suggest it can't be both.

bb

Don White wrote:

This is rich! You have the gall to call another poster on the carpet
for
breaking an agreement. I can't decide if you are suffering some kind
of
dementia,,or are a natural born liar.

***********

Consider the second possibility.

If you check the archives, you'll discover that I *never* posted this
group of f'd up "rules" that JimH keeps attributing to me. He either
believes his own bullcrap, or is insulting the intelligence of the rest
of the NG, en masse, by figuring that constantly repeating a falsehood
will somehow make it seem real. Oh well, why not? Works for Rush
Limbaugh et al, doesn't it?

I'd rather be branded as a breaker of a "rule" I never set, than
self-exposed as a liar without
principles of any sort. How fricking twisted, to base a series of
attacks on some person based your own lie and as if it were a factual
event. A brain is a waste when awarded to a man without a conscience.

wrote in message
oups.com...
Don White wrote:

This is rich! You have the gall to call another poster on the carpet
for
breaking an agreement. I can't decide if you are suffering some kind
of
dementia,,or are a natural born liar.

***********

Consider the second possibility.

If you check the archives, you'll discover that I *never* posted this
group of f'd up "rules" that JimH keeps attributing to me.

Sure you did. They may not have been specifically listed as rule #1, #2,
etc. but you listed them to me when posting about things you don't like that
I (and others) do here from time to time. All I did was number them.

Here they are again Chuck. You may want to study and abide by them....they
are, after all, *your* rules.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chuck's rule #1. No name calling. (Chuck, you can start by dropping the
childish change of my
last name.)



Chuck's rule #2. No discussions about people No politics. No religion.
No
union talk. No talk about war. Boat talk only.


Chuck's rule #3. Serious boating discussion only. No joking around about
anything
related to boats or anything else. One must remain focused and serious when
discussing boating.


Chuck's rule #4. No personal attacks. (I don't want to hear "but Mom, he
started it".)



Chuck's rule #5. A contributor to rec.boats is rated only on the percentage
of boating related topics he/she contributes to the NG. In order to be
considered a contributor one must be 100% on topic with no side bars on non
related items. See rule #3. Chuck Gould will be the ultimate judge as to
ones rating.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++