|
|
|
John H wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:25:28 GMT, "Jim," wrote: jps wrote: In article , says... Damn, Jimcomma, where did you find an honest article? More proof that you're a complete ****in' idiot. She's makin' money off your stupidity as are 1% of the population. jps By now, almost everyone's heard of Jeff Gannon/James Guckert. He's the fake reporter with a false name given all-too-real press credentials by the White House. He's the one who asked the only literate question at the press briefing, to wit: "Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?" You gotta love it! John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes I note the questions remain How did Gannon gained access to White House press briefings without any journalistic qualifications. HOW LONG CAN JOURNALISTS GAIN ACCESS TO THE WHITE HOUSE WITHOUT AN FBI BACKGROUND CHECK? Why did the White House waved him into press briefings for nearly two years using what's called a day pass. Is there a limit to how long a reporter can slide on "day" passes, as Gannon did for years? HOW DID GANNON GET A WHITE HOUSE PRESS PASS TWO MONTHS BEFORE HIS SUPPOSED PUBLICATION EVEN EXISTED? BY WHAT CRITERIA DID THE WHITE HOUSE EVALUATE TALON NEWS? HOW DID GANNON GET A WHITE HOUSE PRESS PASS UNDER A FAKE NAME? WHAT ( if any) IS GANNON'S CONNECTION TO THE VALERIE PLAME CASE? Did his sexual orientation "buy" him any favors from the White House? Time to live up to your motto John "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it" |
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:27:22 -0800, jps wrote:
In article , says... He's the one who asked the only literate question at the press briefing, to wit: "Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?" It's surprising Guckert had enough time to attend press briefings with all the pitching, catching and sucking he had going on. Quite an entrepreneur. Just the kind Republicans admire most. Fake ones. jps I thought you liberal folks were pushing homosexuality as the only way to go! Now you're coming down on someone who may be gay. Y'all need to clean up your act! John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 03:19:19 GMT, "Jim," wrote:
I note the questions remain How did Gannon gained access to White House press briefings without any journalistic qualifications. HOW LONG CAN JOURNALISTS GAIN ACCESS TO THE WHITE HOUSE WITHOUT AN FBI BACKGROUND CHECK? Why did the White House waved him into press briefings for nearly two years using what's called a day pass. Is there a limit to how long a reporter can slide on "day" passes, as Gannon did for years? HOW DID GANNON GET A WHITE HOUSE PRESS PASS TWO MONTHS BEFORE HIS SUPPOSED PUBLICATION EVEN EXISTED? BY WHAT CRITERIA DID THE WHITE HOUSE EVALUATE TALON NEWS? HOW DID GANNON GET A WHITE HOUSE PRESS PASS UNDER A FAKE NAME? WHAT ( if any) IS GANNON'S CONNECTION TO THE VALERIE PLAME CASE? Did his sexual orientation "buy" him any favors from the White House? Time to live up to your motto John "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it" There is no 'difficulty' to divide, Jimcomma. No one, except you, gives a rat's ass about Gannon. The important question to answer is: "Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?" Don't you just love it? That question kind of says it all, doesn't it. I can see why some folks just seem to forget it. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
wrote in message oups.com... Dr. Jonathan Shmithers asked: How was the picture any different than you calling others "grammar school pig-pillers? ********************* How can you be so obtuse? The comment about grammar school pig-pilers was an opinion expressed about a deliberate behavior exhibited in this forum. So was the picture Chucky. Hypocrisy thy name is Chuck Gould. |
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:26:09 -0500, John H wrote:
There is no 'difficulty' to divide, Jimcomma. No one, except you, gives a rat's ass about Gannon. The important question to answer is: You are right, no one should care about Gannon, but you are also wrong. The important question is: How did someone with inadequate credentials gain access to the President? The President's security *should* be more important than any damn question Gannon asked. |
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:50:49 -0500, thunder wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:26:09 -0500, John H wrote: There is no 'difficulty' to divide, Jimcomma. No one, except you, gives a rat's ass about Gannon. The important question to answer is: You are right, no one should care about Gannon, but you are also wrong. The important question is: How did someone with inadequate credentials gain access to the President? The President's security *should* be more important than any damn question Gannon asked. I expect there were enough Secret Service folks around to handle any supposed 'security' issues that may have arisen. I find it hard to believe that you liberals are so suddenly concerned with the 'security' of the president! No, the important question remains that which you folks and the major media delete: "Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?" What a great question!! John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
Gould,
This post reminds me of Netsock repeatedly posting OT messages complaining about Off topic messages. The picture was an attempt at a joke, and an opinion on the intellectually level of Basskisser. No one expected anyone to believe the picture was real. This post in which you call a number of people "sick and twisted",and "predatory" is your opinion. The only difference between these two opinions, is one person attempted to use humor and you did not. wrote in message oups.com... Dr. Jonathan Shmithers asked: How was the picture any different than you calling others "grammar school pig-pillers? ********************* How can you be so obtuse? The comment about grammar school pig-pilers was an opinion expressed about a deliberate behavior exhibited in this forum. To gratify a sick, twisted, predatory sense of "humor", one of your crew posted a photo (so full of stereoypes it almost had to be staged) and claimed "This is the recent wedding photo for so and so." In fact, the predatory personality felt the idea was so inspired it deserved an entire thread of its own. An easily predicted group of folks jumped on the sick, twisted, predatory bandwagon with celebratory high fives and gratuitous reach arounds. What portion of the previous two paragraphs would you care to factually refute? Now let's address the photo, as you're asking how posting the photo compares to expressing an opinion that doing so was juvenile. Unlike the activites upon which I based my opinion, all of which were easily observable in the NG, the photo was not based in fact or reality. It was, as I have said, the internet equivalent of a grade school drawing with distorted features and some poor *******'s name penciled in below. The hillbillie picture thread didn't say a thing about the guy it was purported to represent, but it spoke volumes about the guy who launched the thread and the easily led group of hypocritical psychophant pile-ons unable to distinguish between adult or juvenile behaviors. |
John H wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 03:19:19 GMT, "Jim," wrote: I note the questions remain How did Gannon gained access to White House press briefings without any journalistic qualifications. HOW LONG CAN JOURNALISTS GAIN ACCESS TO THE WHITE HOUSE WITHOUT AN FBI BACKGROUND CHECK? Why did the White House waved him into press briefings for nearly two years using what's called a day pass. Is there a limit to how long a reporter can slide on "day" passes, as Gannon did for years? HOW DID GANNON GET A WHITE HOUSE PRESS PASS TWO MONTHS BEFORE HIS SUPPOSED PUBLICATION EVEN EXISTED? BY WHAT CRITERIA DID THE WHITE HOUSE EVALUATE TALON NEWS? HOW DID GANNON GET A WHITE HOUSE PRESS PASS UNDER A FAKE NAME? WHAT ( if any) IS GANNON'S CONNECTION TO THE VALERIE PLAME CASE? Did his sexual orientation "buy" him any favors from the White House? Time to live up to your motto John "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it" There is no 'difficulty' to divide, Jimcomma. No one, except you, gives a rat's ass about Gannon. The important question to answer is: "Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?" Don't you just love it? That question kind of says it all, doesn't it. I can see why some folks just seem to forget it. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes You can chant that mantra all you want, but it still appears to me that Gannon had some boyfriends in the whitehouse who arranged for him to be a plant. You're not following your own tagline "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it" So do some resolving chant away if you like -- it's sorta like them monks spinning the wheels. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com