In article et,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
WTF??? This WAS about SOAP to clean a BOAT. Keep the political crap out
of
here for gawds sake. It's really out of control now. SOAP does not mean
SOAPBOX!!!!!

Talk to the idiots who started it in this direction.

He is...since he's already talking to you.

If you read back, you'll see that I was talking to Gould about the
biodegradability of soaps. He mentioned the "enviro-nazi's" opposition to
soaps, and I told him that I was surprised that he and I were on the same
side...because I had figured him for an "enviro-Nazi". That is when you
chimed in on a thread that you had contributed absolutely nothing of
substance to.

Precisely the same substance your post had showing your prejudiced
assumptions about Gould's views on enviro-nazis.

Pointing out that you're regularly shallow in your assumptions isn't
political, it's personal.

jps

In article ,
says...
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 20:12:18 -0800, jps wrote:

In article , says...

The sad part of this is who you ****ing idiots elected to run the
country.

jps

So says a true sore loser. Are you joining the Harry and Basskisser name-calling
team?

You were idiots before the Dems lost the election. Nothing has changed.

If Kerry had won you would still be idiots.

jps

In article et,
says...

The funny part of this is how cocksure you were about the outcome of the
election. I told you repeatedly that Bush would win. In fact, I predicted
that he'd break 50%...making him the first president to do so in 16 years.

How shallow of you.

Doesn't matter that there was a third party candidate in 1992 that took
19% of the popular vote and that three of the four "less than 50%
victories" were Republican victories?

If the Democrats weren't so ****ing concerned about playing mini-me
Republicans, Bush would have been tossed.

jps

In article , says...

That is why I killfiled the guy. He is nothing but hot air.

While JimH is the very seat of intelligence -- next to Plato, Aristotle
and Homer Simpson.


jps

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article et,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
WTF??? This WAS about SOAP to clean a BOAT. Keep the political crap
out
of
here for gawds sake. It's really out of control now. SOAP does not
mean
SOAPBOX!!!!!

Talk to the idiots who started it in this direction.

He is...since he's already talking to you.

If you read back, you'll see that I was talking to Gould about the
biodegradability of soaps. He mentioned the "enviro-nazi's" opposition
to
soaps, and I told him that I was surprised that he and I were on the same
side...because I had figured him for an "enviro-Nazi". That is when you
chimed in on a thread that you had contributed absolutely nothing of
substance to.

Precisely the same substance your post had showing your prejudiced
assumptions about Gould's views on enviro-nazis.

Pointing out that you're regularly shallow in your assumptions

Shallow or deep, my assumptions are correct darn near 100% of the time. And
yours are incorrect just as often.

In article . net,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article et,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
WTF??? This WAS about SOAP to clean a BOAT. Keep the political crap
out
of
here for gawds sake. It's really out of control now. SOAP does not
mean
SOAPBOX!!!!!

Talk to the idiots who started it in this direction.

He is...since he's already talking to you.

If you read back, you'll see that I was talking to Gould about the
biodegradability of soaps. He mentioned the "enviro-nazi's" opposition
to
soaps, and I told him that I was surprised that he and I were on the same
side...because I had figured him for an "enviro-Nazi". That is when you
chimed in on a thread that you had contributed absolutely nothing of
substance to.

Precisely the same substance your post had showing your prejudiced
assumptions about Gould's views on enviro-nazis.

Pointing out that you're regularly shallow in your assumptions

Shallow or deep, my assumptions are correct darn near 100% of the time. And
yours are incorrect just as often.

I know I am but what are you? (said in the smarmiest little voice you
can muster).

The word "correct" has been co-opted by the Republican Party an now
means "whatever we determine is correct, no matter the truth."

In that context you're correct 100% of the time and Gould is indeed a
enviro-nazi.

In any realistic context, you're still chalked full of foolish
assumptions.

jps

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:15:37 -0800, jps wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 20:12:18 -0800, jps wrote:

In article , says...

The sad part of this is who you ****ing idiots elected to run the
country.

jps

So says a true sore loser. Are you joining the Harry and Basskisser name-calling
team?

You were idiots before the Dems lost the election. Nothing has changed.

If Kerry had won you would still be idiots.

jps

Wow, jipso, you're gettin' good. Basskisser and Harry better watch out!

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:23:18 -0800, jps wrote:

In article et,
says...

The funny part of this is how cocksure you were about the outcome of the
election. I told you repeatedly that Bush would win. In fact, I predicted
that he'd break 50%...making him the first president to do so in 16 years.

How shallow of you.

From one whose depths reach clear to:

"You were idiots before the Dems lost the election. Nothing has changed.

If Kerry had won you would still be idiots."

But, if Kerry had won, we'd have a lying scumbag for a president!

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

In article ,
says...
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:15:37 -0800, jps wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 20:12:18 -0800, jps wrote:

In article , says...

The sad part of this is who you ****ing idiots elected to run the
country.

jps

So says a true sore loser. Are you joining the Harry and Basskisser name-calling
team?

You were idiots before the Dems lost the election. Nothing has changed.

If Kerry had won you would still be idiots.

jps

Wow, jipso, you're gettin' good. Basskisser and Harry better watch out!

Wow, Herringbonehead, you're gettin' good. JimH and Smithers better
watch out!

In article ,
says...
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:23:18 -0800, jps wrote:

In article et,
says...

The funny part of this is how cocksure you were about the outcome of the
election. I told you repeatedly that Bush would win. In fact, I predicted
that he'd break 50%...making him the first president to do so in 16 years.

How shallow of you.

From one whose depths reach clear to:

"You were idiots before the Dems lost the election. Nothing has changed.

If Kerry had won you would still be idiots."

But, if Kerry had won, we'd have a lying scumbag for a president!

We already have a lying scumbag for a president.

How many of your family members have you lost in Iraq and how many of
our countrymen's lives is it worth to replace an evil dictator with a
civil war?

They never represented a threat to our country. Now this administration
has plundered the country's kitty on behalf of the richest 1% of
Americans, the oil business and a war based on false and misleading
information.

All with your blessing.

You're an idiot, you'll always be an idiot.

jps