| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"KMAN" wrote in message ... in article t, rick at wrote on 3/6/05 11:08 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article et, rick at wrote on 3/6/05 9:12 PM: snip.. as stupid and ignorant as ever, but it's not your fault I didn't work the question very well. So, unlike you, I did not take the scumbag route and refuse to apologize. ================== LOL No, you dishonestly took the route of apologizing to soembody else, not to me. It was an apology to you, but apparently you were confused about that. =================== LOL In a post to somebody else, and never addressing me. OK, if that's your definition of an honest apology, so be it, liarman. You still seem to be claiming that no one dies waiting for treatment though. It could happen in any health care system. When my wife got sick in Miami with kidney stones and was writhing in agony with an as yet undiagnosed problem, she was initially refused treatment because the administrator could not get through on the phone to the insurance company. I haven't seen any evidence that makes me long for a different type of health care system. Every Canadian knows that there are problems with certain types of specialized tests and providing service to remote areas. We all want to improve those situations and there is a national will to do so. ============================ Willful ignorance. Thanks agian for proving you want to remain ignorant... snip tired old crap You, on the other hand, have made a deliberate false accusation. ================ No, I have not. You claimed that I said no one in Canada ever waits for treatment. I never said that. You are a liar and a scumbag and a coward for continuing to insist that I did. =====================\\\ Yes, you did, and I showed you where and how, liarman You showed part of a quote where I said "No one is waiting for treatment" which was a response to your babble about a particular group of people in Newfoundland. ====================== that's what you claimed, liarman. I have not lied about anything. This is the only reference you have made in support of your false accusation: ==== in article , KMAN at wrote on 2/20/05 2:14 PM: in article t, rick at wrote on 2/20/05 1:18 PM: Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their 'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the medical systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2 years for treatment. No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of scan in a specific geographic area and the waiting is for non-emergencies. ==== As we've already reviewed a dozen times, in the above I'm responding to your interpretation of the article about Newfoundland and your assertion that the people in the story were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. Whether you agree with what I said or not (and what I said is supported by one of the doctors quoted in the article) clearly I am not making a statement that no one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment. ====================== No, fool. That post was prior to this one. This one is about your ignorant claims that because a poor person in the US may not be able to get to the doctor right away, then they are 'waiting' for treatment. I pointed out that it wasn't the convenience of the system that is making them wait, as in Canada, but their own. You then proceeded to claim that NO one is waiting for treatment in Canada. Youlied then, and you are lying now about your lie. You have already admitted that this was in error. So, why not move on and refute that people are dying in these wait lines that you now agree too. This is the only reference you have made to anything I have said on the subject, and yet you continue to lie about it and insist that I claimed no one in Canada ever waits for treatment. ================ Because you did, as I have again explained to you. Stop being a scumbag and apologize. You know I never said any such thing, nor do I believe any such thing. ================ I've no need to, liarman. Even the most twisted interpretation could not see that quote as evidence that I stated or believe that no one in Canada waits for treatment. It is only your deliberate dishonesty as a liar and a scumbag that makes it possible for you to insist upon what you know to be untrue. ===================== It has been shown that you did fool, many times now. that you have now admitted your lie has already been determined. I have not lied about anything. ================ Yes, you have. And continue to do so, liarman. This is the only reference you have made in support of your false accusation: =============== Too many drugs last night, liarman? Seeing and thinking double? ==== in article , KMAN at wrote on 2/20/05 2:14 PM: in article t, rick at wrote on 2/20/05 1:18 PM: Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their 'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the medical systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2 years for treatment. No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of scan in a specific geographic area and the waiting is for non-emergencies. ==== As we've already reviewed a dozen times, in the above I'm responding to your interpretation of the article about Newfoundland and your assertion that the people in the story were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. Whether you agree with what I said or not (and what I said is supported by one of the doctors quoted in the article) clearly I am not making a statement that no one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment. ====================== No, fool. That post was prior to this one. This one is about your ignorant claims that because a poor person in the US may not be able to get to the doctor right away, then they are 'waiting' for treatment. I pointed out that it wasn't the convenience of the system that is making them wait, as in Canada, but their own. You then proceeded to claim that NO one is waiting for treatment in Canada. Youlied then, and you are lying now about your lie. You have already admitted that this was in error. So, why not move on and refute that people are dying in these wait lines that you now agree too. This is the only reference you have made to anything I have said on the subject, and yet you continue to lie about it and insist that I claimed no one in Canada ever waits for treatment. Stop being a scumbag and apologize. You know I never said any such thing, nor do I believe any such thing. ====================== You may not believe it now, because the proof has been given. But, you did say it, liarman, just as you have proven above. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"rick" wrote in message ink.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article t, rick at wrote on 3/6/05 11:08 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article et, rick at wrote on 3/6/05 9:12 PM: snip.. as stupid and ignorant as ever, but it's not your fault I didn't work the question very well. So, unlike you, I did not take the scumbag route and refuse to apologize. ================== LOL No, you dishonestly took the route of apologizing to soembody else, not to me. It was an apology to you, but apparently you were confused about that. =================== LOL In a post to somebody else, and never addressing me. OK, if that's your definition of an honest apology, so be it, liarman. You still seem to be claiming that no one dies waiting for treatment though. It could happen in any health care system. When my wife got sick in Miami with kidney stones and was writhing in agony with an as yet undiagnosed problem, she was initially refused treatment because the administrator could not get through on the phone to the insurance company. I haven't seen any evidence that makes me long for a different type of health care system. Every Canadian knows that there are problems with certain types of specialized tests and providing service to remote areas. We all want to improve those situations and there is a national will to do so. ============================ Willful ignorance. Will to do better. Ignorance infers not knowing about the problems involved, and I do. snip tired old crap You, on the other hand, have made a deliberate false accusation. ================ No, I have not. You claimed that I said no one in Canada ever waits for treatment. I never said that. You are a liar and a scumbag and a coward for continuing to insist that I did. =====================\\\ Yes, you did, and I showed you where and how, liarman You showed part of a quote where I said "No one is waiting for treatment" which was a response to your babble about a particular group of people in Newfoundland. ====================== that's what you claimed, liarman. I have not lied about anything. This is the only reference you have made in support of your false accusation: ==== in article , KMAN at wrote on 2/20/05 2:14 PM: in article t, rick at wrote on 2/20/05 1:18 PM: Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their 'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the medical systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2 years for treatment. No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of scan in a specific geographic area and the waiting is for non-emergencies. ==== As we've already reviewed a dozen times, in the above I'm responding to your interpretation of the article about Newfoundland and your assertion that the people in the story were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. Whether you agree with what I said or not (and what I said is supported by one of the doctors quoted in the article) clearly I am not making a statement that no one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment. ====================== No, fool. That post was prior to this one. This one is about your ignorant claims that because a poor person in the US may not be able to get to the doctor right away, then they are 'waiting' for treatment. I pointed out that it wasn't the convenience of the system that is making them wait, as in Canada, but their own. You then proceeded to claim that NO one is waiting for treatment in Canada. Where did I say that? Quit being so obscure. If I said "no one is waiting for treatment in Canada" post that quote with the full context so it can be explored. You've just spent several days insisting that my quote about Newfoundland proved your case, now you are dropping that (duh) and moving on to some other accusation. Have some guts. Stop being a scumbag. You were wrong, just apologize and move on. But now, you are too big of a scumbag and a coward. snip same old crap |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KMAN" wrote in message .. . "rick" wrote in message ink.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article t, rick at wrote on 3/6/05 11:08 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article et, rick at wrote on 3/6/05 9:12 PM: snip.. as stupid and ignorant as ever, but it's not your fault I didn't work the question very well. So, unlike you, I did not take the scumbag route and refuse to apologize. ================== LOL No, you dishonestly took the route of apologizing to soembody else, not to me. It was an apology to you, but apparently you were confused about that. =================== LOL In a post to somebody else, and never addressing me. OK, if that's your definition of an honest apology, so be it, liarman. You still seem to be claiming that no one dies waiting for treatment though. It could happen in any health care system. When my wife got sick in Miami with kidney stones and was writhing in agony with an as yet undiagnosed problem, she was initially refused treatment because the administrator could not get through on the phone to the insurance company. I haven't seen any evidence that makes me long for a different type of health care system. Every Canadian knows that there are problems with certain types of specialized tests and providing service to remote areas. We all want to improve those situations and there is a national will to do so. ============================ Willful ignorance. Will to do better. Ignorance infers not knowing about the problems involved, and I do. snip tired old crap You, on the other hand, have made a deliberate false accusation. ================ No, I have not. You claimed that I said no one in Canada ever waits for treatment. I never said that. You are a liar and a scumbag and a coward for continuing to insist that I did. =====================\\\ Yes, you did, and I showed you where and how, liarman You showed part of a quote where I said "No one is waiting for treatment" which was a response to your babble about a particular group of people in Newfoundland. ====================== that's what you claimed, liarman. I have not lied about anything. This is the only reference you have made in support of your false accusation: ==== in article , KMAN at wrote on 2/20/05 2:14 PM: in article t, rick at wrote on 2/20/05 1:18 PM: Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their 'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the medical systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2 years for treatment. No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of scan in a specific geographic area and the waiting is for non-emergencies. ==== As we've already reviewed a dozen times, in the above I'm responding to your interpretation of the article about Newfoundland and your assertion that the people in the story were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. Whether you agree with what I said or not (and what I said is supported by one of the doctors quoted in the article) clearly I am not making a statement that no one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment. ====================== No, fool. That post was prior to this one. This one is about your ignorant claims that because a poor person in the US may not be able to get to the doctor right away, then they are 'waiting' for treatment. I pointed out that it wasn't the convenience of the system that is making them wait, as in Canada, but their own. You then proceeded to claim that NO one is waiting for treatment in Canada. Where did I say that? Quit being so obscure. If I said "no one is waiting for treatment in Canada" post that quote with the full context so it can be explored. ========================= LOL YOU just posted the context fool. Your statement was not in the post about the boy in newfoundland. It was in response by me to your nonsense about 'poor' people in the US not getting TO the hospital for treatment. I appropratly showed you that their convenince in getting to the doctor does not equate with the systematic wait for treatment recieved by mnay Canadains. THAT is where you made you ignorant statement about no one waiting for treatment in Canada, liarman. You did not make it at the time I posted the link about the boyi Nfld. You've just spent several days insisting that my quote about Newfoundland proved your case, now you are dropping that (duh) and moving on to some other accusation. Have some guts. Stop being a scumbag. You were wrong, just apologize and move on. But now, you are too big of a scumbag and a coward. ==================== No, fool. I'm not. You are the one that is keeping this going so that you don't have to answer about the rest of your stupidity and lies. snip same old crap |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"rick" wrote in message nk.net... "KMAN" wrote in message .. . "rick" wrote in message ink.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article t, rick at wrote on 3/6/05 11:08 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article et, rick at wrote on 3/6/05 9:12 PM: snip.. as stupid and ignorant as ever, but it's not your fault I didn't work the question very well. So, unlike you, I did not take the scumbag route and refuse to apologize. ================== LOL No, you dishonestly took the route of apologizing to soembody else, not to me. It was an apology to you, but apparently you were confused about that. =================== LOL In a post to somebody else, and never addressing me. OK, if that's your definition of an honest apology, so be it, liarman. You still seem to be claiming that no one dies waiting for treatment though. It could happen in any health care system. When my wife got sick in Miami with kidney stones and was writhing in agony with an as yet undiagnosed problem, she was initially refused treatment because the administrator could not get through on the phone to the insurance company. I haven't seen any evidence that makes me long for a different type of health care system. Every Canadian knows that there are problems with certain types of specialized tests and providing service to remote areas. We all want to improve those situations and there is a national will to do so. ============================ Willful ignorance. Will to do better. Ignorance infers not knowing about the problems involved, and I do. snip tired old crap You, on the other hand, have made a deliberate false accusation. ================ No, I have not. You claimed that I said no one in Canada ever waits for treatment. I never said that. You are a liar and a scumbag and a coward for continuing to insist that I did. =====================\\\ Yes, you did, and I showed you where and how, liarman You showed part of a quote where I said "No one is waiting for treatment" which was a response to your babble about a particular group of people in Newfoundland. ====================== that's what you claimed, liarman. I have not lied about anything. This is the only reference you have made in support of your false accusation: ==== in article , KMAN at wrote on 2/20/05 2:14 PM: in article t, rick at wrote on 2/20/05 1:18 PM: Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their 'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the medical systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2 years for treatment. No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of scan in a specific geographic area and the waiting is for non-emergencies. ==== As we've already reviewed a dozen times, in the above I'm responding to your interpretation of the article about Newfoundland and your assertion that the people in the story were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. Whether you agree with what I said or not (and what I said is supported by one of the doctors quoted in the article) clearly I am not making a statement that no one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment. ====================== No, fool. That post was prior to this one. This one is about your ignorant claims that because a poor person in the US may not be able to get to the doctor right away, then they are 'waiting' for treatment. I pointed out that it wasn't the convenience of the system that is making them wait, as in Canada, but their own. You then proceeded to claim that NO one is waiting for treatment in Canada. Where did I say that? Quit being so obscure. If I said "no one is waiting for treatment in Canada" post that quote with the full context so it can be explored. ========================= LOL YOU just posted the context fool. Oh, I see, so you are only referring to the discussion about Newfoundland. Thanks for finally confirming that this is all about your being a scumbag and liar and deliberately making a false accusation and being unwilling to admit it. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KMAN" wrote in message . .. " snip ====================== that's what you claimed, liarman. I have not lied about anything. This is the only reference you have made in support of your false accusation: ==== in article , KMAN at wrote on 2/20/05 2:14 PM: in article t, rick at wrote on 2/20/05 1:18 PM: Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their 'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the medical systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2 years for treatment. No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of scan in a specific geographic area and the waiting is for non-emergencies. ==== As we've already reviewed a dozen times, in the above I'm responding to your interpretation of the article about Newfoundland and your assertion that the people in the story were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. Whether you agree with what I said or not (and what I said is supported by one of the doctors quoted in the article) clearly I am not making a statement that no one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment. ====================== No, fool. That post was prior to this one. This one is about your ignorant claims that because a poor person in the US may not be able to get to the doctor right away, then they are 'waiting' for treatment. I pointed out that it wasn't the convenience of the system that is making them wait, as in Canada, but their own. You then proceeded to claim that NO one is waiting for treatment in Canada. Where did I say that? Quit being so obscure. If I said "no one is waiting for treatment in Canada" post that quote with the full context so it can be explored. ========================= LOL YOU just posted the context fool. Oh, I see, so you are only referring to the discussion about Newfoundland. ===================== LOL You are that stupid, aren't you, liarman? No, the discussion about Nfld was in a previous post. Thanks for finally confirming that this is all about your being a scumbag and liar and deliberately making a false accusation and being unwilling to admit it. ========================== ROTFLMAO Only a totally dishonest lair could come up with bit of idiocy, liarman. Thanks for proving how much you HAVE to lie, liarman.. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
