| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"rick" wrote in message nk.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message nk.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message snip I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making a fool of yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to the post (long ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question allowed you to meet the burden of proof I requested. ============================== Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar regardless of how you make your claim. All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your dishonesty. ========================== That was but one example to show that you were lying Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is waiting for treatment. ================= Yes, you did. No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. ========================== LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a Canadian site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you can't seem to keep things straight here, eh liarman? It doesn't matter. Even if we differ on what the article itself says (since the doctor in the article mentions specifically that all the patients are under care, I don't know why you perseverate on it) the point is I was only responding your claim about that one article - I wasn't talking about all of Canada or all Canadians. I never said no one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment - which is what you claimed I said. ================ Yes, you did. I refuted your claim that the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2.5 years for treatment. Whether or not you choose to accept that refutation, that in no way substantiates your false claim that I said no one in Canada ever waits for treatment. You are a dishonest scumbag and you owe me an apology. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message nk.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message nk.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message snip I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making a fool of yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to the post (long ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question allowed you to meet the burden of proof I requested. ============================== Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar regardless of how you make your claim. All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your dishonesty. ========================== That was but one example to show that you were lying Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is waiting for treatment. ================= Yes, you did. No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. ========================== LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a Canadian site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you can't seem to keep things straight here, eh liarman? It doesn't matter. Even if we differ on what the article itself says (since the doctor in the article mentions specifically that all the patients are under care, I don't know why you perseverate on it) the point is I was only responding your claim about that one article - I wasn't talking about all of Canada or all Canadians. I never said no one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment - which is what you claimed I said. ================ Yes, you did. I refuted your claim that the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2.5 years for treatment. ======================== No, you did not, liarman. Whether or not you choose to accept that refutation, ================ You have to make it first, liarman... that in no way substantiates your false claim that I said no one in Canada ever waits for treatment. You are a dishonest scumbag and you owe me an apology. ================== No, I don't. And, I'm not the one that claimed they would, liarman. Where's yours? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"rick" wrote in message ink.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message nk.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message nk.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message snip I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making a fool of yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to the post (long ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question allowed you to meet the burden of proof I requested. ============================== Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar regardless of how you make your claim. All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your dishonesty. ========================== That was but one example to show that you were lying Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is waiting for treatment. ================= Yes, you did. No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. ========================== LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a Canadian site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you can't seem to keep things straight here, eh liarman? It doesn't matter. Even if we differ on what the article itself says (since the doctor in the article mentions specifically that all the patients are under care, I don't know why you perseverate on it) the point is I was only responding your claim about that one article - I wasn't talking about all of Canada or all Canadians. I never said no one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment - which is what you claimed I said. ================ Yes, you did. I refuted your claim that the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2.5 years for treatment. ======================== No, you did not, liarman. Yeah, I did. You said: "Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their 'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the medical systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2 years for treatment." Then I said: "No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of scan in a specific geographic area and the waiting is for non-emergencies." Whether or not you choose to accept that refutation, ================ You have to make it first, liarman... You said: "Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their 'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the medical systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2 years for treatment." Then I said: "No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of scan in a specific geographic area and the waiting is for non-emergencies." that in no way substantiates your false claim that I said no one in Canada ever waits for treatment. You are a dishonest scumbag and you owe me an apology. ================== No, I don't. And, I'm not the one that claimed they would, liarman. Where's yours? Huh? You claimed I said no one in Canada waits for treatment. I did not say that. Your claim is false. Your refusal to admit your claim is false makes you dishonest, and your continued dishonesty makes you a scumbag and a coward. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message ink.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message nk.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message nk.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message snip I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making a fool of yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to the post (long ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question allowed you to meet the burden of proof I requested. ============================== Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar regardless of how you make your claim. All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your dishonesty. ========================== That was but one example to show that you were lying Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is waiting for treatment. ================= Yes, you did. No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. ========================== LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a Canadian site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you can't seem to keep things straight here, eh liarman? It doesn't matter. Even if we differ on what the article itself says (since the doctor in the article mentions specifically that all the patients are under care, I don't know why you perseverate on it) the point is I was only responding your claim about that one article - I wasn't talking about all of Canada or all Canadians. I never said no one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment - which is what you claimed I said. ================ Yes, you did. I refuted your claim that the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2.5 years for treatment. ======================== No, you did not, liarman. Yeah, I did. ===================== Nope. You said: "Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their 'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the medical systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2 years for treatment." ================= Yep, what part of 'they' don't you understand. Even you were talking 'people' in your question to me that prompted this reply. Then I said: "No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of scan in a specific geographic area and the waiting is for non-emergencies." ====================== Yes, and you are lying. People are waiting for treatment. Even in the case presented, the doctor that orderwed the test doesn't know what treatment to do because he had to know whether that kid had a genetic component to his problem. He couldn't provide treatment until he got the test. Whether or not you choose to accept that refutation, ================ You have to make it first, liarman... You said: "Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their 'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the medical systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2 years for treatment." ================= Yep, what part of 'they' don't you understand. Even you were talking 'people' in your question to me that prompted this reply. You seeing double tonight, or just want to expose your lies more than once? Then I said: "No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of scan in a specific geographic area and the waiting is for non-emergencies." ====================== Yes, and you are lying. People are waiting for treatment. Even in the case presented, the doctor that orderwed the test doesn't know what treatment to do because he had to know whether that kid had a genetic component to his problem. He couldn't provide treatment until he got the test. that in no way substantiates your false claim that I said no one in Canada ever waits for treatment. You are a dishonest scumbag and you owe me an apology. ================== No, I don't. And, I'm not the one that claimed they would, liarman. Where's yours? Huh? You claimed I said no one in Canada waits for treatment. ================================ Yes, you did, and you also claimed that no one was dying from those waits. You're still lying, liarman. I did not say that. Your claim is false. Your refusal to admit your claim is false makes you dishonest, and your continued dishonesty makes you a scumbag and a coward. ================== Nope... |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KMAN" wrote in message ... in article t, rick at wrote on 3/4/05 10:04 PM: snip same old crap that in no way substantiates your false claim that I said no one in Canada ever waits for treatment. You are a dishonest scumbag and you owe me an apology. ================== No, I don't. And, I'm not the one that claimed they would, liarman. Where's yours? Huh? You claimed I said no one in Canada waits for treatment. ================================ Yes, you did Post a quote from me where I said "no one in Canada waits for treatment." ===================== It has been fool, many times now. that you have now admitted your lie has already beem determined. Now, how about the rest of your lies about wait lists, liarman? Go ahead, cowardly scum. ================ LOL This from the liarman afraid to review the facts enough to try to provide any refutation. Otherwise, admit you are a lying scum and apologize! =========================== Nope, no need. However, you have yet to keep your word about an apology. But then, we know what your word is worth, eh liarman? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
