"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message


snip

I don't think you've been paying attention and you are
making
a fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you
to
the post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question
allowed you to meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar
regardless of how you make your claim.

All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland
were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right.

You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your
dishonesty.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying

Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada
is waiting for
treatment.
=================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my
response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed
people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment.
==========================
LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a
Canadian site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you
can't seem to keep things straight here, eh liarman?


Within the same article, it is pointed out that they
are all in fact in receipt of treatment, and are waiting for a
specific test, a test that they will receive more quickly if
necessary.
==========================
Nope. Their treatment depended on getting the scans fool.



This is not
proof that I said no one in Canada waits for treatment. I never
said that, and it's silly to suggest that I did. Everyone in
every health care system has to wait.
==========================
Thanks for admitting that you originally lied, liarman.


Stop being such a scumbag and apologize. Or are you too big of
a coward?
===============
Nope. you must be though. Where's yours, liarman?

"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message


snip

I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making
a fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to
the post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question
allowed you to meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar
regardless of how you make your claim.

All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland
were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right.

You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your
dishonesty.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying

Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is
waiting for
treatment.
=================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my response to
your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were waiting 2
1/2 years for treatment.
==========================
LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a Canadian site,
that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you can't seem to keep things
straight here, eh liarman?

It doesn't matter. Even if we differ on what the article itself says (since
the doctor in the article mentions specifically that all the patients are
under care, I don't know why you perseverate on it) the point is I was only
responding your claim about that one article - I wasn't talking about all of
Canada or all Canadians. I never said no one in Canada ever has to wait for
treatment - which is what you claimed I said.

You owe me an apology, but you are too big of a coward and scumbag to do it.

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message


snip

I don't think you've been paying attention and you are
making
a fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you
to
the post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the
question
allowed you to meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a
liar
regardless of how you make your claim.

All it proves is that I told you the people in
Newfoundland
were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was
right.

You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your
dishonesty.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying

Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in
Canada is waiting for
treatment.
=================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my
response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you
claimed people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment.
==========================
LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a
Canadian site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you
can't seem to keep things straight here, eh liarman?

It doesn't matter. Even if we differ on what the article itself
says (since the doctor in the article mentions specifically
that all the patients are under care, I don't know why you
perseverate on it) the point is I was only responding your
claim about that one article - I wasn't talking about all of
Canada or all Canadians. I never said no one in Canada ever has
to wait for treatment - which is what you claimed I said.
================
Yes, you did. But it's nice to see you have admitted your lie.



You owe me an apology, but you are too big of a coward and
scumbag to do it.
==================
No, I don't. And, I'm not the one that claimed they would,
liarman. Where's yours?

"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message


snip

I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making
a fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to
the post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question
allowed you to meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar
regardless of how you make your claim.

All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland
were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right.

You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your
dishonesty.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying

Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is
waiting for
treatment.
=================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my response to
your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were waiting
2 1/2 years for treatment.
==========================
LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a Canadian site,
that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you can't seem to keep
things straight here, eh liarman?

It doesn't matter. Even if we differ on what the article itself says
(since the doctor in the article mentions specifically that all the
patients are under care, I don't know why you perseverate on it) the
point is I was only responding your claim about that one article - I
wasn't talking about all of Canada or all Canadians. I never said no one
in Canada ever has to wait for treatment - which is what you claimed I
said.
================
Yes, you did.

I refuted your claim that the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2.5
years for treatment. Whether or not you choose to accept that refutation,
that in no way substantiates your false claim that I said no one in Canada
ever waits for treatment. You are a dishonest scumbag and you owe me an
apology.

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message


snip

I don't think you've been paying attention and you
are making
a fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point
you to
the post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the
question
allowed you to meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a
liar
regardless of how you make your claim.

All it proves is that I told you the people in
Newfoundland
were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was
right.

You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your
dishonesty.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying

Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in
Canada is waiting for
treatment.
=================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my
response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you
claimed people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment.
==========================
LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a
Canadian site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad
you can't seem to keep things straight here, eh liarman?

It doesn't matter. Even if we differ on what the article
itself says (since the doctor in the article mentions
specifically that all the patients are under care, I don't
know why you perseverate on it) the point is I was only
responding your claim about that one article - I wasn't
talking about all of Canada or all Canadians. I never said no
one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment - which is what
you claimed I said.
================
Yes, you did.

I refuted your claim that the people in Newfoundland were not
waiting 2.5 years for treatment.
========================
No, you did not, liarman.



Whether or not you choose to accept that refutation,
================
You have to make it first, liarman...


that in no way substantiates your false claim that I said no
one in Canada ever waits for treatment. You are a dishonest
scumbag and you owe me an apology.
==================
No, I don't. And, I'm not the one that claimed they would,
liarman. Where's yours?

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message


snip

I don't think you've been paying attention and you are making
a fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point you to
the post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the question
allowed you to meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a liar
regardless of how you make your claim.

All it proves is that I told you the people in Newfoundland
were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right.

You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your
dishonesty.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying

Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in Canada is
waiting for
treatment.
=================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my response to
your story about Newfoundland, in which you claimed people were
waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment.
==========================
LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a Canadian
site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad you can't seem to
keep things straight here, eh liarman?

It doesn't matter. Even if we differ on what the article itself says
(since the doctor in the article mentions specifically that all the
patients are under care, I don't know why you perseverate on it) the
point is I was only responding your claim about that one article - I
wasn't talking about all of Canada or all Canadians. I never said no
one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment - which is what you
claimed I said.
================
Yes, you did.

I refuted your claim that the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2.5
years for treatment.
========================
No, you did not, liarman.

Yeah, I did.

You said:

"Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their 'convenience',
we're talking about the convenience of the medical systam. When that 'poor'
person arrives at a medical facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they
will not wait 2 1/2 years for treatment."

Then I said:

"No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of scan in a
specific geographic area and the waiting is for non-emergencies."

Whether or not you choose to accept that refutation,
================
You have to make it first, liarman...

You said:

"Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their 'convenience',
we're talking about the convenience of the medical systam. When that 'poor'
person arrives at a medical facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they
will not wait 2 1/2 years for treatment."

Then I said:

"No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of scan in a
specific geographic area and the waiting is for non-emergencies."


that in no way substantiates your false claim that I said no one in
Canada ever waits for treatment. You are a dishonest scumbag and you owe
me an apology.
==================
No, I don't. And, I'm not the one that claimed they would, liarman.
Where's yours?

Huh? You claimed I said no one in Canada waits for treatment. I did not say
that. Your claim is false. Your refusal to admit your claim is false makes
you dishonest, and your continued dishonesty makes you a scumbag and a
coward.

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message


snip

I don't think you've been paying attention and you
are making
a fool of
yourself. You might want to ask Tinkerntom to point
you to
the post (long
ago) where I conceded that the way I framed the
question
allowed you to meet
the burden of proof I requested.
==============================
Yet the proof was presented, and it proves you are a
liar
regardless of how you make your claim.

All it proves is that I told you the people in
Newfoundland
were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was
right.

You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting
your
dishonesty.
==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying

Whatever you think it was, I never said that no one in
Canada is waiting for
treatment.
=================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. The only evidence that you presented was my
response to your story about Newfoundland, in which you
claimed people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment.
==========================
LOL No, fool "I" didn't claim that, I posted the site, a
Canadian site, that states that, and backs it up. Too bad
you can't seem to keep things straight here, eh liarman?

It doesn't matter. Even if we differ on what the article
itself says (since the doctor in the article mentions
specifically that all the patients are under care, I don't
know why you perseverate on it) the point is I was only
responding your claim about that one article - I wasn't
talking about all of Canada or all Canadians. I never said
no one in Canada ever has to wait for treatment - which is
what you claimed I said.
================
Yes, you did.

I refuted your claim that the people in Newfoundland were not
waiting 2.5 years for treatment.
========================
No, you did not, liarman.

Yeah, I did.
=====================
Nope.


You said:

"Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their
'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the
medical systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical
facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait
2 1/2 years for treatment."
=================
Yep, what part of 'they' don't you understand. Even you were
talking 'people' in your question to me that prompted this reply.



Then I said:

"No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of
scan in a specific geographic area and the waiting is for
non-emergencies."
======================
Yes, and you are lying. People are waiting for treatment. Even
in the case presented, the doctor that orderwed the test doesn't
know what treatment to do because he had to know whether that kid
had a genetic component to his problem. He couldn't provide
treatment until he got the test.


Whether or not you choose to accept that refutation,
================
You have to make it first, liarman...

You said:

"Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their
'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the
medical systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical
facility in need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait
2 1/2 years for treatment."
=================
Yep, what part of 'they' don't you understand. Even you were
talking 'people' in your question to me that prompted this reply.
You seeing double tonight, or just want to expose your lies more
than once?


Then I said:

"No one is waiting for treatment. It's about a specific type of
scan in a specific geographic area and the waiting is for
non-emergencies."
======================
Yes, and you are lying. People are waiting for treatment. Even
in the case presented, the doctor that orderwed the test doesn't
know what treatment to do because he had to know whether that kid
had a genetic component to his problem. He couldn't provide
treatment until he got the test.





that in no way substantiates your false claim that I said no
one in Canada ever waits for treatment. You are a dishonest
scumbag and you owe me an apology.
==================
No, I don't. And, I'm not the one that claimed they would,
liarman. Where's yours?

Huh? You claimed I said no one in Canada waits for treatment.
================================
Yes, you did, and you also claimed that no one was dying from
those waits. You're still lying, liarman.




I did not say
that. Your claim is false. Your refusal to admit your claim is
false makes you dishonest, and your continued dishonesty makes
you a scumbag and a coward.
==================
Nope...