| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
in article , rick at
wrote on 3/3/05 4:31 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message link.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article et, rick at wrote on 3/2/05 10:19 PM: "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article et, rick at wrote on 3/2/05 6:03 PM: snip.. You've captured it perfectly. I got so frustrated with rick's spew that I tried to pin him down and make him focus more on his wild claims about Canadian health care, and all that happened instead is he took the dishonest tactic of picking on the wording of my attempts to make him focus. ===================== No, there was no misleading by me of your lies, er wording, liarman. You made direct declarative statements that you cannot back up. I focused entirely on your lies that no 1) no one is waiting for treatment in Canada, Scumbag. You know very well what I declared was that the people in Newfoundland were not waiting for 2 1/2 years for treatment - the lie YOU were telling. But you are too big of a coward to admit it. ====================== Nope. that's not what you said Yes it is. I responded to your allegation that the people featured in the story were waiting for treatment. They aren't. And you are a scumbag for taking my statement out of that context and trying to say that I was referring to all persons in Canada. ======================== Nope. you claimed no one was waiting for treatment No. I said that the people in Newfoundland were not waiting for treatment as you had falsely claimed. Your refusal to apolgize for your dishonesty is further cementing your reputation as a coward and scumbag. ============================ Nope. That's what you are trying to explain away now I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. ============== No, you weren't. You were lying as usual. Their treatment did not start for at least 2 1/2 years. As stated in the article: "While the wait is less than ideal, patients' conditions are being investigated andfollowed by other medical means, and that anyone needing an emergency scan gets one," said Geoffrey Higgins, clinical chief of diagnostic imaging at the Health Care Corporation of St. John's. They are waiting for a specific specialized test. They are not waiting for treatment. You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your dishonesty. ========================== That was but one example to show that you were lying Whatever you think it was, your claim that I said no one in Canada waits for treatment is false. You owe me an apology. But you are too week and too much of coward to do what you know if right. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KMAN" wrote in message ... in article , rick at snip I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. ============== No, you weren't. You were lying as usual. Their treatment did not start for at least 2 1/2 years. As stated in the article: "While the wait is less than ideal, patients' conditions are being investigated andfollowed by other medical means, and that anyone needing an emergency scan gets one," said Geoffrey Higgins, clinical chief of diagnostic imaging at the Health Care Corporation of St. John's. ====================== Yes, and an emergency scan may be too late. What part of all this really is over your head? The doctor wants to start treatment, the system sayd he cannot because they must wait for the test that will tell him how to [proceed. You really are grasping at strwas here, liarman. But even that aside, why are you diverting the discussion away from the fact that people ARE dying while waiting for treatmant? Alread know that you've been proven a liar, liarman? They are waiting for a specific specialized test. They are not waiting for treatment. ================== You really are this stupid, aren't you? The doctotr wants to give treatment, the system says he must wait for the tests that will determine that treatment. He is waiting for treatment. You are as ignorant as always, liarman. You are a scumbag, and a coward for not admitting your dishonesty. ========================== That was but one example to show that you were lying Whatever you think it was, your claim that I said no one in Canada waits for treatment is false. You owe me an apology. But you are too week and too much of coward to do what you know if right. ========================== Yes, you did. Too bad for you that all you have is this exsecise in futility, and lies. Where's your refutation that people are dying while waiting, liarman? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"rick" wrote in message k.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article , rick at snip I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. ============== No, you weren't. You were lying as usual. Their treatment did not start for at least 2 1/2 years. As stated in the article: "While the wait is less than ideal, patients' conditions are being investigated andfollowed by other medical means, and that anyone needing an emergency scan gets one," said Geoffrey Higgins, clinical chief of diagnostic imaging at the Health Care Corporation of St. John's. ====================== Yes, and an emergency scan may be too late. What part of all this really is over your head? The doctor wants to start treatment The doctor states that they are already receiving treatment, and that anyone who needs the scan earlier will get it. But whether you believe this means they are in treatment or not, this does nothing to support your statement that I claimed no one in Canada waits for treatment. The only statement of mine you have pointed out was my response to your comment about Newfoundland. I was not speaking about "all of Canada" or "anyone in Canada" I was disputing your claim that those people in the article were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. Whether you agree with me on that or not, you are being extremely dishonest, and a supreme scumbag by insisting that this somehow means I claimed no one in Canada waits for treatment. Stop being a scumbag and apologize. Or are you too big of a coward? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message k.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article , rick at snip I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. ============== No, you weren't. You were lying as usual. Their treatment did not start for at least 2 1/2 years. As stated in the article: "While the wait is less than ideal, patients' conditions are being investigated andfollowed by other medical means, and that anyone needing an emergency scan gets one," said Geoffrey Higgins, clinical chief of diagnostic imaging at the Health Care Corporation of St. John's. ====================== Yes, and an emergency scan may be too late. What part of all this really is over your head? The doctor wants to start treatment The doctor states that they are already receiving treatment, and that anyone who needs the scan earlier will get it. ====================== No, it does not. It specifically says that they do not know the condition of the boys one remaining kidney. The point that they can get emergincy scans is bogus, fool. When the boy deteriorates to the point where it's an emergency the treatnment that the doctor wanted to provide right away might be too late. You really are just desperate to continue his thread because you know you have been proven to have lied also about people not dying in wait lines. But whether you believe this means they are in treatment or not, this does nothing to support your statement that I claimed no one in Canada waits for treatment. ================ Yes, it does... Because that response was not directly at the point where this boy was being discussed. The whole post was about wait lists in Canada. You claimed no one was waiting. You are the one trying to take your statement out of the context of the discussion because you know you lied, and are continuing to lie, liarman. The only statement of mine you have pointed out was my response to your comment about Newfoundland. I was not speaking about "all of Canada" or "anyone in Canada" I was disputing your claim that those people in the article were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. ====================== No, it wasn't, because that isn't when you made your claim, liarman... Whether you agree with me on that or not, you are being extremely dishonest, and a supreme scumbag by insisting that this somehow means I claimed no one in Canada waits for treatment. Stop being a scumbag and apologize. Or are you too big of a coward? ================ No, not at all, you must be though, where's yours, liarman? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"rick" wrote in message ink.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message k.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article , rick at snip I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. ============== No, you weren't. You were lying as usual. Their treatment did not start for at least 2 1/2 years. As stated in the article: "While the wait is less than ideal, patients' conditions are being investigated andfollowed by other medical means, and that anyone needing an emergency scan gets one," said Geoffrey Higgins, clinical chief of diagnostic imaging at the Health Care Corporation of St. John's. ====================== Yes, and an emergency scan may be too late. What part of all this really is over your head? The doctor wants to start treatment The doctor states that they are already receiving treatment, and that anyone who needs the scan earlier will get it. ====================== No, it does not. "While the wait is less than ideal, patients' conditions are being investigated and followed by other medical means" What does that mean to you, fool? LOL. Besides, it doesn't matter if we disagree on that article. The fact is, that's all I was commenting on - your response to that article. And you know it. So stop being a dishonest scumbag and coward and apologize. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message ink.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... "rick" wrote in message k.net... "KMAN" wrote in message ... in article , rick at snip I told you the people in Newfoundland were not waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment and I was right. ============== No, you weren't. You were lying as usual. Their treatment did not start for at least 2 1/2 years. As stated in the article: "While the wait is less than ideal, patients' conditions are being investigated andfollowed by other medical means, and that anyone needing an emergency scan gets one," said Geoffrey Higgins, clinical chief of diagnostic imaging at the Health Care Corporation of St. John's. ====================== Yes, and an emergency scan may be too late. What part of all this really is over your head? The doctor wants to start treatment The doctor states that they are already receiving treatment, and that anyone who needs the scan earlier will get it. ====================== No, it does not. "While the wait is less than ideal, patients' conditions are being investigated and followed by other medical means" ==================== LOL Still doesn't mean they are getting the treatment they need, liarman. What does that mean to you, fool? LOL. ==================== That you have a reading problem. It doesn't say they are recieving the treatment that they need, liarman. Besides, it doesn't matter if we disagree on that article. The fact is, that's all I was commenting on - your response to that article. And you know it. So stop being a dishonest scumbag and coward and apologize. ======================== Nope. It's your dishonest lying that is going on. Why the continued rehash of these lies when the real disucssion was about you claim that no one dies while waiting, liarman? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
