Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
KMAN
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"rick" wrote in message
link.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 10:18 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 5:59 PM:


snip...


You're telling me there aren't poor people in the US in
isolated or slum
areas where they have a hard time getting a scan at
their
convenience? Get
real.
====================
Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their
'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of
the
medical
systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical
facility in
need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2
years
for treatment.

No one is waiting for treatment.
======================
Yes, they are. Weeks months and years. Even you have
agreed to that, now.

Nono. Stop being dishonest.

I never said no one in Canada is waiting for treatment.
================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. I respond to your goofy claim that the people
in
your example were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment when in
fact they were all in current receipt of care.

Stop being such a scumbag. You owe me an apology but your are
too weak and too much of coward to do it.
======================
Nope. Where's yours, liarman?

I responded to your allegation that the people featured in the
story were
waiting for treatment. They aren't. And you are a scumbag for
taking my
statement out of that context and trying to say that I was
referring to all
persons in Canada.
=====================
No, you replied that no one is waiting for treatment. liarman.


You owe me an apology, but you are too weak and too big of a
coward to do
it.
+=================
No, I don't. But it seems you have forgotten about your, eh
liarman. Proof that people are dying in waiting lines in Canada
have been presented to you, yet you are still spewing about a lie
you have already taken back. Why is that, liarman? Don't want
to discuss your continued willful ignorance?


What happened is you blathered on about the people in Newfoundland
waiting 2
1/2 years for treatment, and I responded that they are not waiting for
treatment. And they aren't. So stop being a scumbag, stop being a
coward,
suck it up and apologize. Or are you just too weak?

========================
ROTFLMAO You really are this desperate now, aren't you, liarman? I'm not
the one that was blathering about it.


Yeah, you were.

You were rambling on about how people were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment
in the story about people in Newfoundland. They aren't waiting 2 1/2 years
for treatment, and I told you so. Then you tried to say that I was stating
that no one in Canada waits for anything, which is not what I said at all.
You are a scumbag.


  #2   Report Post  
rick
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
link.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 10:18 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick
at
wrote on 3/2/05 5:59 PM:


snip...


You're telling me there aren't poor people in the
US in
isolated or slum
areas where they have a hard time getting a scan at
their
convenience? Get
real.
====================
Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about
their
'convenience', we're talking about the convenience
of
the
medical
systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a
medical
facility in
need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2
1/2
years
for treatment.

No one is waiting for treatment.
======================
Yes, they are. Weeks months and years. Even you have
agreed to that, now.

Nono. Stop being dishonest.

I never said no one in Canada is waiting for treatment.
================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. I respond to your goofy claim that the
people
in
your example were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment when
in
fact they were all in current receipt of care.

Stop being such a scumbag. You owe me an apology but your
are
too weak and too much of coward to do it.
======================
Nope. Where's yours, liarman?

I responded to your allegation that the people featured in
the
story were
waiting for treatment. They aren't. And you are a scumbag
for
taking my
statement out of that context and trying to say that I was
referring to all
persons in Canada.
=====================
No, you replied that no one is waiting for treatment.
liarman.


You owe me an apology, but you are too weak and too big of
a
coward to do
it.
+=================
No, I don't. But it seems you have forgotten about your, eh
liarman. Proof that people are dying in waiting lines in
Canada
have been presented to you, yet you are still spewing about
a lie
you have already taken back. Why is that, liarman? Don't
want
to discuss your continued willful ignorance?

What happened is you blathered on about the people in
Newfoundland waiting 2
1/2 years for treatment, and I responded that they are not
waiting for
treatment. And they aren't. So stop being a scumbag, stop
being a coward,
suck it up and apologize. Or are you just too weak?

========================
ROTFLMAO You really are this desperate now, aren't you,
liarman? I'm not the one that was blathering about it.


Yeah, you were.

=====================
No fool, I wasn't. It was one site out of several I posted. And
it was the only time I brought it up.



You were rambling on about how people were waiting 2 1/2 years
for treatment in the story about people in Newfoundland. They
aren't waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment, and I told you so.
Then you tried to say that I was stating that no one in Canada
waits for anything, which is not what I said at all. You are a
scumbag.

==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying, and still
are, liarman. You did make that claim fool, because the post you
were repliying to was all about waiting for health care in
Canada. You have now decided to tap dance by claiming it was
about only one site, and one example.






  #3   Report Post  
KMAN
 
Posts: n/a
Default

in article , rick at
wrote on 3/3/05 4:30 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
link.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 10:18 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick
at
wrote on 3/2/05 5:59 PM:


snip...


You're telling me there aren't poor people in the
US in
isolated or slum
areas where they have a hard time getting a scan at
their
convenience? Get
real.
====================
Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about
their
'convenience', we're talking about the convenience
of
the
medical
systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a
medical
facility in
need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2
1/2
years
for treatment.

No one is waiting for treatment.
======================
Yes, they are. Weeks months and years. Even you have
agreed to that, now.

Nono. Stop being dishonest.

I never said no one in Canada is waiting for treatment.
================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. I respond to your goofy claim that the
people
in
your example were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment when
in
fact they were all in current receipt of care.

Stop being such a scumbag. You owe me an apology but your
are
too weak and too much of coward to do it.
======================
Nope. Where's yours, liarman?

I responded to your allegation that the people featured in
the
story were
waiting for treatment. They aren't. And you are a scumbag
for
taking my
statement out of that context and trying to say that I was
referring to all
persons in Canada.
=====================
No, you replied that no one is waiting for treatment.
liarman.


You owe me an apology, but you are too weak and too big of
a
coward to do
it.
+=================
No, I don't. But it seems you have forgotten about your, eh
liarman. Proof that people are dying in waiting lines in
Canada
have been presented to you, yet you are still spewing about
a lie
you have already taken back. Why is that, liarman? Don't
want
to discuss your continued willful ignorance?

What happened is you blathered on about the people in
Newfoundland waiting 2
1/2 years for treatment, and I responded that they are not
waiting for
treatment. And they aren't. So stop being a scumbag, stop
being a coward,
suck it up and apologize. Or are you just too weak?
========================
ROTFLMAO You really are this desperate now, aren't you,
liarman? I'm not the one that was blathering about it.


Yeah, you were.

=====================
No fool, I wasn't. It was one site out of several I posted. And
it was the only time I brought it up.


Right. You were the one that brought it up.



You were rambling on about how people were waiting 2 1/2 years
for treatment in the story about people in Newfoundland. They
aren't waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment, and I told you so.
Then you tried to say that I was stating that no one in Canada
waits for anything, which is not what I said at all. You are a
scumbag.

==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying, and still
are, liarman. You did make that claim fool, because the post you
were repliying to was all about waiting for health care in
Canada. You have now decided to tap dance by claiming it was
about only one site, and one example.


You said that I claimed no one in Canada ever waits for treatment. I never
said that. I said that the people in your example were not waiting 2 1/2
years for treatment, and they were not. As it states in the very article you
cited, they were all receiving constant care.

You owe me an apology.


  #4   Report Post  
rick
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article ,
rick at
wrote on 3/3/05 4:30 PM:



snip


=====================
No, you replied that no one is waiting for treatment.
liarman.


You owe me an apology, but you are too weak and too big
of
a
coward to do
it.
+=================
No, I don't. But it seems you have forgotten about your,
eh
liarman. Proof that people are dying in waiting lines in
Canada
have been presented to you, yet you are still spewing
about
a lie
you have already taken back. Why is that, liarman? Don't
want
to discuss your continued willful ignorance?

What happened is you blathered on about the people in
Newfoundland waiting 2
1/2 years for treatment, and I responded that they are not
waiting for
treatment. And they aren't. So stop being a scumbag, stop
being a coward,
suck it up and apologize. Or are you just too weak?
========================
ROTFLMAO You really are this desperate now, aren't you,
liarman? I'm not the one that was blathering about it.

Yeah, you were.

=====================
No fool, I wasn't. It was one site out of several I posted.
And
it was the only time I brought it up.


Right. You were the one that brought it up.
==================

Yes, I did, once. You are the one that kept blaterhering about
it because you didn't want to continue the discussion as it
started, people dying. Why is that, liarman? Afraid of the
truth, as usual?




You were rambling on about how people were waiting 2 1/2
years
for treatment in the story about people in Newfoundland. They
aren't waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment, and I told you so.
Then you tried to say that I was stating that no one in
Canada
waits for anything, which is not what I said at all. You are
a
scumbag.

==========================
That was but one example to show that you were lying, and
still
are, liarman. You did make that claim fool, because the post
you
were repliying to was all about waiting for health care in
Canada. You have now decided to tap dance by claiming it was
about only one site, and one example.


You said that I claimed no one in Canada ever waits for
treatment.

=====================
You did. Thatvwas the discussion fool, and you made that
statement. Too bad for you that you are too stupid to know what
you're saying most of the time, eh liarman?



I never
said that. I said that the people in your example were not
waiting 2 1/2
years for treatment, and they were not. As it states in the
very article you
cited, they were all receiving constant care.

You owe me an apology.
=======================

No fool, where's yours?



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview W. Watson General 0 November 14th 04 11:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017