"KMAN" wrote in message
. ..

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/1/05 11:27 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick
at
wrote on 3/1/05 9:34 PM:

kman also claimed that no one in Canada waits for
treatment,
yet
another lie
http://www.angelfire.com/pa/sergeman...anbacklog.html

I never made that claim,
===========================
Yes, you did.
"...No one is waiting for treatment..." 2/20/2005 2:14pm
Complete sentence. No "and", "or", "but".

Just because it is a sentence doesn't mean it is a complete
statement.

Example:

What do you mean rick is a bit of an idiot, that's not true.
He's got to be
the biggest idiot on the planet!

To paste only the first sentence and then claim that I don't
think rick is
an idiot would be just as dishonest as what you have been
doing with my
sentence about waiting.

Here is more of the context:

======

As many as 100 children in Newfoundland face 30-month waits
for
the
high-tech scans, said Geoffrey Higgins, clinical chief of
diagnostic imaging
at the Health Care Corporation of St. John's. While the
wait is
"less than
ideal," he said patients' conditions are being investigated
and
followed by
other medical means, and that anyone needing an emergency
scan
gets one.
======================
LOL Sure, 2 years into a wait he might really NEED emegency
treatment, eh? At that time he goes right to the top of the
list. Maybe too late, eh? At the least, he has suffered
more
than was medically necessary, and at worst is now beyond
treatment, or too weak to survive the treatment.


You're telling me there aren't poor people in the US in
isolated or slum
areas where they have a hard time getting a scan at their
convenience? Get
real.
====================
Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their
'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the
medical
systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical
facility in
need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2
years
for treatment.

No one is waiting for treatment.
======================
Yes, they are. Weeks months and years. Even you have agreed
to that, now.

Nono. Stop being dishonest.

I never said no one in Canada is waiting for treatment.
================
Yes, you did.



See the context above again. It is not that complicated.
================
The context digs you in deeper into your lies, liarman.



I responded to your claim that the people in your example were
waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment. They are not.

It's about a specific type of scan in a
specific geographic area and the waiting is for
non-emergencies.
====================
Nope. You claimed that no Canadians were waiting for
treatment.

I made no such claim, you are a liar and a scumbag. There is no
such thing as a health care system where no one waits for
treatment.

You owe me an apology.
==============
No fool. You lied, and continue to lie.

rick, you're sticking to this like baby **** to a blanket. grow up, put
some pampers on, and spare the rest of us...

don't you get it?the topic is dead! over! finito! basta! fertig!

frtzw906

"BCITORGB" wrote in message
oups.com...
rick, you're sticking to this like baby **** to a blanket. grow
up, put
some pampers on, and spare the rest of us...

don't you get it?the topic is dead! over! finito! basta!
fertig!
=====================
But just because you say it's over doesn't mean that Canadians
aren't still dying while waiting for treatment, eh?



frtzw906

"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
. ..

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article et, rick
at
wrote on 3/1/05 11:27 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/1/05 9:34 PM:

kman also claimed that no one in Canada waits for treatment,
yet
another lie
http://www.angelfire.com/pa/sergeman...anbacklog.html

I never made that claim,
===========================
Yes, you did.
"...No one is waiting for treatment..." 2/20/2005 2:14pm
Complete sentence. No "and", "or", "but".

Just because it is a sentence doesn't mean it is a complete statement.

Example:

What do you mean rick is a bit of an idiot, that's not true. He's got
to be
the biggest idiot on the planet!

To paste only the first sentence and then claim that I don't think rick
is
an idiot would be just as dishonest as what you have been doing with my
sentence about waiting.

Here is more of the context:

======

As many as 100 children in Newfoundland face 30-month waits for
the
high-tech scans, said Geoffrey Higgins, clinical chief of
diagnostic imaging
at the Health Care Corporation of St. John's. While the wait is
"less than
ideal," he said patients' conditions are being investigated and
followed by
other medical means, and that anyone needing an emergency scan
gets one.
======================
LOL Sure, 2 years into a wait he might really NEED emegency
treatment, eh? At that time he goes right to the top of the
list. Maybe too late, eh? At the least, he has suffered more
than was medically necessary, and at worst is now beyond
treatment, or too weak to survive the treatment.


You're telling me there aren't poor people in the US in
isolated or slum
areas where they have a hard time getting a scan at their
convenience? Get
real.
====================
Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their
'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the medical
systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical facility in
need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2 years
for treatment.

No one is waiting for treatment.
======================
Yes, they are. Weeks months and years. Even you have agreed to that,
now.

Nono. Stop being dishonest.

I never said no one in Canada is waiting for treatment.
================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. I respond to your goofy claim that the people in your example
were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment when in fact they were all in current
receipt of care.

Stop being such a scumbag. You owe me an apology but your are too weak and
too much of coward to do it.

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
. ..

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick
at
wrote on 3/1/05 11:27 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et,
rick at
wrote on 3/1/05 9:34 PM:

kman also claimed that no one in Canada waits for
treatment,
yet
another lie
http://www.angelfire.com/pa/sergeman...anbacklog.html

I never made that claim,
===========================
Yes, you did.
"...No one is waiting for treatment..." 2/20/2005
2:14pm
Complete sentence. No "and", "or", "but".

Just because it is a sentence doesn't mean it is a complete
statement.

Example:

What do you mean rick is a bit of an idiot, that's not
true. He's got to be
the biggest idiot on the planet!

To paste only the first sentence and then claim that I
don't think rick is
an idiot would be just as dishonest as what you have been
doing with my
sentence about waiting.

Here is more of the context:

======

As many as 100 children in Newfoundland face 30-month
waits for
the
high-tech scans, said Geoffrey Higgins, clinical chief of
diagnostic imaging
at the Health Care Corporation of St. John's. While the
wait is
"less than
ideal," he said patients' conditions are being
investigated and
followed by
other medical means, and that anyone needing an emergency
scan
gets one.
======================
LOL Sure, 2 years into a wait he might really NEED
emegency
treatment, eh? At that time he goes right to the top of
the
list. Maybe too late, eh? At the least, he has suffered
more
than was medically necessary, and at worst is now beyond
treatment, or too weak to survive the treatment.


You're telling me there aren't poor people in the US in
isolated or slum
areas where they have a hard time getting a scan at their
convenience? Get
real.
====================
Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their
'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the
medical
systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical
facility in
need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2
years
for treatment.

No one is waiting for treatment.
======================
Yes, they are. Weeks months and years. Even you have
agreed to that, now.

Nono. Stop being dishonest.

I never said no one in Canada is waiting for treatment.
================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. I respond to your goofy claim that the people in
your example were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment when in
fact they were all in current receipt of care.

Stop being such a scumbag. You owe me an apology but your are
too weak and too much of coward to do it.
======================
Nope. Where's yours, liarman?

in article et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 5:59 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...

"rick" wrote in message
nk.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
. ..

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick
at
wrote on 3/1/05 11:27 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et,
rick at
wrote on 3/1/05 9:34 PM:

kman also claimed that no one in Canada waits for
treatment,
yet
another lie
http://www.angelfire.com/pa/sergeman...anbacklog.html

I never made that claim,
===========================
Yes, you did.
"...No one is waiting for treatment..." 2/20/2005
2:14pm
Complete sentence. No "and", "or", "but".

Just because it is a sentence doesn't mean it is a complete
statement.

Example:

What do you mean rick is a bit of an idiot, that's not
true. He's got to be
the biggest idiot on the planet!

To paste only the first sentence and then claim that I
don't think rick is
an idiot would be just as dishonest as what you have been
doing with my
sentence about waiting.

Here is more of the context:

======

As many as 100 children in Newfoundland face 30-month
waits for
the
high-tech scans, said Geoffrey Higgins, clinical chief of
diagnostic imaging
at the Health Care Corporation of St. John's. While the
wait is
"less than
ideal," he said patients' conditions are being
investigated and
followed by
other medical means, and that anyone needing an emergency
scan
gets one.
======================
LOL Sure, 2 years into a wait he might really NEED
emegency
treatment, eh? At that time he goes right to the top of
the
list. Maybe too late, eh? At the least, he has suffered
more
than was medically necessary, and at worst is now beyond
treatment, or too weak to survive the treatment.


You're telling me there aren't poor people in the US in
isolated or slum
areas where they have a hard time getting a scan at their
convenience? Get
real.
====================
Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their
'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of the
medical
systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical
facility in
need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2
years
for treatment.

No one is waiting for treatment.
======================
Yes, they are. Weeks months and years. Even you have
agreed to that, now.

Nono. Stop being dishonest.

I never said no one in Canada is waiting for treatment.
================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. I respond to your goofy claim that the people in
your example were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment when in
fact they were all in current receipt of care.

Stop being such a scumbag. You owe me an apology but your are
too weak and too much of coward to do it.
======================
Nope. Where's yours, liarman?

I responded to your allegation that the people featured in the story were
waiting for treatment. They aren't. And you are a scumbag for taking my
statement out of that context and trying to say that I was referring to all
persons in Canada.

You owe me an apology, but you are too weak and too big of a coward to do
it.

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 5:59 PM:


snip...


You're telling me there aren't poor people in the US in
isolated or slum
areas where they have a hard time getting a scan at
their
convenience? Get
real.
====================
Another strawman, I see. We aren't talking about their
'convenience', we're talking about the convenience of
the
medical
systam. When that 'poor' person arrives at a medical
facility in
need, then yes, I'm saying that they will not wait 2 1/2
years
for treatment.

No one is waiting for treatment.
======================
Yes, they are. Weeks months and years. Even you have
agreed to that, now.

Nono. Stop being dishonest.

I never said no one in Canada is waiting for treatment.
================
Yes, you did.

No, I didn't. I respond to your goofy claim that the people
in
your example were waiting 2 1/2 years for treatment when in
fact they were all in current receipt of care.

Stop being such a scumbag. You owe me an apology but your are
too weak and too much of coward to do it.
======================
Nope. Where's yours, liarman?

I responded to your allegation that the people featured in the
story were
waiting for treatment. They aren't. And you are a scumbag for
taking my
statement out of that context and trying to say that I was
referring to all
persons in Canada.
=====================
No, you replied that no one is waiting for treatment. liarman.


You owe me an apology, but you are too weak and too big of a
coward to do
it.
+=================
No, I don't. But it seems you have forgotten about your, eh
liarman. Proof that people are dying in waiting lines in Canada
have been presented to you, yet you are still spewing about a lie
you have already taken back. Why is that, liarman? Don't want
to discuss your continued willful ignorance?