"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/1/05 5:20 PM:



snip...



Here, let me restore your dishonesty again, liar..

"No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the
determination whether or not people should have them.
You lost, again, and now have you resort to your
ignorant spews... checkmate, proven liar..."

What is the need for assault weapons to the general public?
It's a valid question. They are only useful for spraying
bullets. Why else do you need them? In response to this YOU
brought up the fact that people get killed by cars. But cars
have many other valid and valuable purposes.
================
So do weapons.

What are the valuable purposes of assault weapons that are
comparable to the
valuable purposes of cars?
========================
LOL Tap, tap, tap. First it's does it have a need? As if
'need' is the determenat as to whether an object can be owned.
Now it's a 'valuable' need! You really don't have a clue, do
you, liarman.

When you going to read the facts about the claims you have made
about health care, liar?

in article t, rick at
wrote on 3/1/05 11:01 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/1/05 5:20 PM:



snip...



Here, let me restore your dishonesty again, liar..

"No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the
determination whether or not people should have them.
You lost, again, and now have you resort to your
ignorant spews... checkmate, proven liar..."

What is the need for assault weapons to the general public?
It's a valid question. They are only useful for spraying
bullets. Why else do you need them? In response to this YOU
brought up the fact that people get killed by cars. But cars
have many other valid and valuable purposes.
================
So do weapons.

What are the valuable purposes of assault weapons that are
comparable to the
valuable purposes of cars?
========================
LOL Tap, tap, tap. First it's does it have a need? As if
'need' is the determenat as to whether an object can be owned.
Now it's a 'valuable' need! You really don't have a clue, do
you, liarman.

What a surprise, the coward isn't going to answer!

Here's what you said: see above!

===

KMAN: cars have many other valid and valuable purposes.

rick: So do weapons

===

So, coward, why are you being a scumbag and refusing to name those valid and
valuable purposes of assault weapons?

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article t,
rick at
wrote on 3/1/05 11:01 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/1/05 5:20 PM:



snip...



Here, let me restore your dishonesty again, liar..

"No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the
determination whether or not people should have them.
You lost, again, and now have you resort to your
ignorant spews... checkmate, proven liar..."

What is the need for assault weapons to the general public?
It's a valid question. They are only useful for spraying
bullets. Why else do you need them? In response to this YOU
brought up the fact that people get killed by cars. But
cars
have many other valid and valuable purposes.
================
So do weapons.

What are the valuable purposes of assault weapons that are
comparable to the
valuable purposes of cars?
========================
LOL Tap, tap, tap. First it's does it have a need? As if
'need' is the determenat as to whether an object can be owned.
Now it's a 'valuable' need! You really don't have a clue, do
you, liarman.

What a surprise, the coward isn't going to answer!

Here's what you said: see above!

===

KMAN: cars have many other valid and valuable purposes.

rick: So do weapons

===

So, coward, why are you being a scumbag and refusing to name
those valid and
valuable purposes of assault weapons?
======================
Because, liarman, unlike you, I don't purport to be the arbiter
of what is useful, valuable, or necessary. That is the
perogative of eack person, liarman.

"rick" wrote in message
ink.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article t, rick at
wrote on 3/1/05 11:01 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/1/05 5:20 PM:



snip...



Here, let me restore your dishonesty again, liar..

"No, you brought up the "need" of an object being the
determination whether or not people should have them.
You lost, again, and now have you resort to your
ignorant spews... checkmate, proven liar..."

What is the need for assault weapons to the general public?
It's a valid question. They are only useful for spraying
bullets. Why else do you need them? In response to this YOU
brought up the fact that people get killed by cars. But cars
have many other valid and valuable purposes.
================
So do weapons.

What are the valuable purposes of assault weapons that are
comparable to the
valuable purposes of cars?
========================
LOL Tap, tap, tap. First it's does it have a need? As if
'need' is the determenat as to whether an object can be owned.
Now it's a 'valuable' need! You really don't have a clue, do
you, liarman.

What a surprise, the coward isn't going to answer!

Here's what you said: see above!

===

KMAN: cars have many other valid and valuable purposes.

rick: So do weapons

===

So, coward, why are you being a scumbag and refusing to name those valid
and
valuable purposes of assault weapons?
======================
Because, liarman, unlike you, I don't purport to be the arbiter of what is
useful, valuable, or necessary. That is the perogative of eack person,
liarman.

Why did you say weapons also have valid and valuable purposes if you were
not prepared to name them?

What a coward!

"KMAN" wrote in message
. ..



snip...


===

So, coward, why are you being a scumbag and refusing to name
those valid and
valuable purposes of assault weapons?
======================
Because, liarman, unlike you, I don't purport to be the
arbiter of what is useful, valuable, or necessary. That is
the perogative of eack person, liarman.

Why did you say weapons also have valid and valuable purposes
if you were not prepared to name them?

What a coward!
==================
Nope. Because, unlike you, I don't pretend to be the arbiter of
what is and is not a valuable use for 'any' product.
I leave the socialist dictattorship to you, liarman.

And, why do you continue to be the dishonest poster that you are
known to be by deleteing responses, and then replying like they
weren't there, eh liarman? Just can't help yourself, can you?

in article et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 5:46 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
. ..



snip...


===

So, coward, why are you being a scumbag and refusing to name
those valid and
valuable purposes of assault weapons?
======================
Because, liarman, unlike you, I don't purport to be the
arbiter of what is useful, valuable, or necessary. That is
the perogative of eack person, liarman.

Why did you say weapons also have valid and valuable purposes
if you were not prepared to name them?

What a coward!
==================
Nope. Because, unlike you, I don't pretend to be the arbiter of
what is and is not a valuable use for 'any' product.

You said that assault weapons have value. That's just an empty assertion
unless you are prepared to state the value. Grow up.

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
et, rick at
wrote on 3/2/05 5:46 PM:


"KMAN" wrote in message
. ..



snip...


===

So, coward, why are you being a scumbag and refusing to
name
those valid and
valuable purposes of assault weapons?
======================
Because, liarman, unlike you, I don't purport to be the
arbiter of what is useful, valuable, or necessary. That is
the perogative of eack person, liarman.

Why did you say weapons also have valid and valuable purposes
if you were not prepared to name them?

What a coward!
==================
Nope. Because, unlike you, I don't pretend to be the arbiter
of
what is and is not a valuable use for 'any' product.

You said that assault weapons have value. That's just an empty
assertion
unless you are prepared to state the value. Grow up.
===========================
You've claimed alot of things here in this group, and have yet to
back any of those assertion up with anything but your lies. Talk
about emptiness, that's the whole of your writings. Why now
must everyone else bend to your ignorance, liarman? Again, what
is of 'value' is different to different people. Why should I
presume to speak for everyine just because you feel you can,
liarman?