| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"KMAN" wrote in message ... in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 2/27/05 2:39 PM: snip... Do you think rick is interested in any messages? ============== Yes, truthful ones. When you going to make one? He's not even interested in supporting any of his own statements. ================ I have fool. You, on the other hand, have never been able to. Why is that? Too busy lying? snip.. Well Tinkerntom, it's very simple. Rick has made the claim, and he has failed to support it. ================= LOL I provided sites for you. You are the one afraid to find out the facts... Thanks again for proving your willful ignorance, and the fact that you have nothing to back up your claims.... Do you agree? ================= Not if he reads the entire thread, and sees that I have supported my claims. More than once. And yet the bottom line as I see it, is that it is your system, and if it works for you, that is your business. It would only become my business if someone tried to enforce the system or some variation here in the States, which Hillary tried, and at the time, the majority of the people decided that we preferred the existing system we already have. But do you agree that rick has made a claim that he has failed to support? The topic at hand is really quite irrlevant to the question. ================= LOL I provided sites for you. You are the one afraid to find out the facts... Thanks again for proving your willful ignorance, and the fact that you have nothing to back up your claims.... Now as far as r being a liar and a coward, I don't know. I came back refreshed from vacation to find you two carrying on. I don't know when or where it started, and mostly have tried to ignore your spat. I have not seen any point in getting involved, or of even going back and trying to find the supposed and questioned post by either one of you. I have enough trouble keeping my post square as you well know from our previous experiences. I have been told back in the beginning by my good friends Wilko and riverman, not to say anything on the forum, that you would say to someone face to face. Now seeing that he is a gun nut (your definition) and possibly walks around with his "Assault weapon" armed and ready, it might not be wise to walk up to him and call him a "liar and a coward." So then I find it most profitable to refraim from doing so here on the net as well. But do you agree that rick has made a claim that he has failed to support? ================= LOL I provided sites for you. You are the one afraid to find out the facts... Thanks again for proving your willful ignorance, and the fact that you have nothing to back up your claims.... C'mon Tinkerntom, what type of society are we to build here in rec.boats.paddle if we are not to support the basic building blocks of logical discussion? Shame on you! Now if you wanted to continue a new thread about the advantages of the Canadian Health Care system, sometime in the future, maybe there could be a logical discussion, but I doubt that could happen at this time in this thread. There appears to be to much macho image at risk between the two of you. I will look forward to that discussion, and I hope that I am back on your list of reasonable non cowards! TnT This is about basic integrity Tinkerntom. The topic is really a subordinate issue. It is no different than if rick were to claim that purple kayaks result in increased death rates. ================= LOL I provided sites for you. You are the one afraid to find out the facts... Thanks again for proving your willful ignorance, and the fact that you have nothing to back up your claims.... |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview | General | |||
Threaded Mode
