A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:


You implicitly reject the existence of God not because God has been
scientifically disproven

Why do you continue to lie about this?

What part of "implicitly" do you fail to understand?

Provide a single quote where
I have said that God does not exist.

Nor have you responded to a specific question about whether you believe God
does exist, and are thus evading the question.

The fact that you can't deal
with any discussion without lying and misrepresenting the truth
proves that you are an idiot.

In my experience, college level scholars don't generally engage in
name-calling and ad hominem attack merely because they dispute the veracity
of their opponent's claims. They instead argue the facts and present
evidence and argumentation tending to support their thesis, while
recognizing that conflict in theories is the essence of intellectual
inquiry.

That being the case, I judge, once again, that you are a tenth-grade
equivalent Netwit of fractional wit and less interest.

Given that you are clearly uninterested in a reasoned philosophical debate
sans invective, I believe I'll stop wasting my time with you.

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

On 26-Feb-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

You implicitly reject the existence of God not because God has been
scientifically disproven

Why do you continue to lie about this?

What part of "implicitly" do you fail to understand?

I have _explicity_ stated otherwise, idiot.

Nor have you responded to a specific question

You still have not provided _any_ proof for _any_ specious
claim on which you have been challenged.

They instead argue the facts and present
evidence and argumentation tending to support their thesis, while
recognizing that conflict in theories is the essence of intellectual
inquiry.

I have argued the facts, idiot and still haven't seen you produce
a single fact to support your ridiculous claims.

Given that you are clearly uninterested in a reasoned philosophical debate

You haven't even begun to engage in reasoned debate. You have lied,
misrepresented what is said, made unsupportable claims and refused
to offer any facts in your defense. You have no claim to any
high road. YOu are a fool that wastes everyone elses' time. NOw
you are abandoning the discussion because you have proved nothing
but that you are an idiot.

Mike