About Us

in article t, rick at
wrote on 2/25/05 12:15 AM:

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article ,
rick at
wrote on 2/24/05 9:32 PM:

"KMAN" wrote in message
...

snippage...

IOW, you know you're beat and are trying to slither out of
admitting it. I'm
not going to do your homework for you. Besides, YOU are the
one who implied
substantial US deaths from "assault weapons," so it's up to
YOU to
substantiate that claim.

Unless there are no deaths from them, it doesn't matter. They
aren't needed
==============
According to whom????? You? You are hardly the arbiter of
what
people need. If I were you, the first thing I'd do is look
for
an education. Yours was sorely lacking. Maybe you should
demand
your money back...

Whatever selfish but harmless reasons there might be for
desiring to own an
assault weapon, they can't possibly outweight the benefits of
not having
them available to those who wish to kill a lot of people
quickly.
========================
Where are all these people that wish to kill 'a lot'(code for
1000s) of people?

"A lot" is NOT code for 1000s of people. It's not code for anything.

Again, fortunatly you are not the arbiter of
what is or is not needed. You really have no clue about weapons,
do you, fool?

I know that an assault rifle is designed to kill a lot of people quickly.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview	W. Watson	General	0	November 14th 04 11:05 PM