wilko, you warned about some of these characters... i may be wrong,
because i'm new here, but after a constant barrage of rick posts, i was
very happy to see scott back... am i going nuts myself?

frtzw906

BCITORGB wrote:
wilko, you warned about some of these characters... i may be wrong,
because i'm new here, but after a constant barrage of rick posts, i
was
very happy to see scott back... am i going nuts myself?

frtzw906

I think I warned you as well, and if you notice, I have not tried to
get between him and you and KMAN. I know Kman enjoys a good headache
now and then, and I figured that now with rick was as good a time as
ever. I realize that I have given KMAN a few headaches myself, but I
believe in equal opportunity headaches, and rick's are as good as
anyone elses. I have found our conversation a little more civil, and
not needing any remedial headaches, so have a good nights rest, and
know that Scott will be back tomorrow. TnT

"BCITORGB" wrote in message
oups.com...
wilko, you warned about some of these characters... i may be
wrong,
because i'm new here, but after a constant barrage of rick
posts, i was
very happy to see scott back... am i going nuts myself?
==================
You just don't like having your idocy challenged. Thanks for
the compliment.



frtzw906

BCITORGB wrote:

wilko, you warned about some of these characters... i may be wrong,
because i'm new here, but after a constant barrage of rick posts, i was
very happy to see scott back... am i going nuts myself?

Do you want me to tell you as it is or do you prefer a politically
correct answer? ;-)

Rick Pus is a troll in my book, but so is Last Word Weiser. The
difference between them is not so big, with both telling their prey, in
an attempt at superiority, that they don't get it, that the prey are
fools or whatever. Scott can usually keep his prey dangling a little
longer with semi-coherent retorts and vague arguments, before starting
to call people stupid, ignorant, fools, whatever, whereas Rick seems to
leave out the argumentation part, heading straight for the insults.

Neither of them are very sophisticated when it comes to being trolls,
though.

--
Wilko van den Bergh wilko(a t)dse(d o t)nl
Eindhoven The Netherlands Europe
---Look at the possibilities, don't worry about the limitations.---
http://wilko.webzone.ru/

Thanks Doctor Wilko.

frtzw906

"Wilko" wrote in message
...
BCITORGB wrote:

wilko, you warned about some of these characters... i may be
wrong,
because i'm new here, but after a constant barrage of rick
posts, i was
very happy to see scott back... am i going nuts myself?

Do you want me to tell you as it is or do you prefer a
politically correct answer? ;-)

Rick Pus is a troll in my book, but so is Last Word Weiser.
=======================
Then I suggest you have no clue as to the meaning of the word
troll either. I respond with discussion and reason. That you
refuse to accept facts that are contrary to your ideology is sad.


The
difference between them is not so big, with both telling their
prey, in an attempt at superiority, that they don't get it,
that the prey are fools or whatever. Scott can usually keep his
prey dangling a little longer with semi-coherent retorts and
vague arguments, before starting to call people stupid,
ignorant, fools, whatever, whereas Rick seems to leave out the
argumentation part, heading straight for the insults.
======================
LOL What a hoot! To leave not out the 'argumantation' would
mean that the person i reply to had an argument to begin with.
In the cases here so far, that has not been the case, as with any
of your posts on the subject. You have added nothing but idiocy,
making you more the troll...




Neither of them are very sophisticated when it comes to being
trolls, though.
=================
I bow to the master troll.....



--
Wilko van den Bergh wilko(a t)dse(d o
t)nl
Eindhoven The Netherlands Europe
---Look at the possibilities, don't worry about the
limitations.---
http://wilko.webzone.ru/

A Usenet persona calling itself BCITORGB wrote:

wilko, you warned about some of these characters... i may be wrong,
because i'm new here, but after a constant barrage of rick posts, i was
very happy to see scott back... am i going nuts myself?

Going? No, not "going." Past-tense would be appropriate however.

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser