On 24-Feb-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Nope.

Prove it.

Don't have to. Innocent till proven guilty.

Idiot - you are afraid to address the facts.

International law forbids invading any country. End of story. The US
does not respect other countries' borders, hence we shouldn't bother
respecting theirs.


Ibid.

Ditto

Mike

A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:

On 24-Feb-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Nope.

Prove it.

Don't have to. Innocent till proven guilty.

Idiot - you are afraid to address the facts.

International law forbids invading any country.

No, it doesn't, and even if it did, the US is not subject to international
law. We are a sovereign nation with our own laws, which we obey. One of
those laws permits us to go to war, and invading a combatant nation is part
of going to war.

End of story.

Hardly.

The US
does not respect other countries' borders,

Only terrorist and terrorist-supporting nations, and they don't deserve to
be respected by anyone...and their leadership deserves to be extirpated so
the people of those nations can live free.

hence we shouldn't bother
respecting theirs.

That's your choice. But, I suggest that you have the force to back it up
with.
--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

On 24-Feb-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

No, it doesn't,

Prove it!

and even if it did, the US is not subject to international
law.

Wrong again, dickhead. The US is a signatory to those international
laws. But the the US isn't very good at sticking to its promises.

Only terrorist and terrorist-supporting nations, and they don't deserve to
be respected by anyone...and their leadership deserves to be extirpated so
the people of those nations can live free.

Complete bull****, with the invasion of Honduras being a prime example.

You still have no idea what you are talking about. You still insist on
being wrong.

Mike