rick says:
==============
It is amazing that you rely on 10-15 year old books for your current
events
===========================

"rely" on?! what are you on about?!

are historical data of no interest? and you'll note that the dutch
study came out in 2004.

frtzw906

"BCITORGB" wrote in message
oups.com...
rick says:
==============
It is amazing that you rely on 10-15 year old books for your
current
events
===========================

"rely" on?! what are you on about?!

are historical data of no interest? and you'll note that the
dutch
study came out in 2004.
=====================
Here, let me help you out fool, since you are still dishonestly
snipping all the posts just to make your replies to things that
aren't said.

restore...
"BCITORGB" wrote in message
oups.com...
KMAN, while I'm passing on interesting tidbits of info, I
thought you
might find this interesting:

http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/8Comparison.htm

frtzw906

I might, if the link worked for me :-)
end restore.

That link is to a book report from the early 90s. Now, let me
restore the last post yopu are pretending to reply to...

restore...
LOL Again, you've yet to find me praising the US system. Maybe
that's what you wish I said so that your own jingoistic blather
wouldn't look quite so outragious. It is amazing that you rely
on 10-15 year old books for your current events, and dely that
your own health care system isn't working for every Canadian
right now! Talk about having your head in the sand, and living
in the past, and I'd say you and kman have the far more narrow
provincial viewpoint....
end restore...


Again, when you begin to post honestly, come on back. Until
then, you have nothing to add, except dishonest blather...



frtzw906

rick, it is you who decided to reply to something i thought kman might
find interesting. kman indicated an inability to open the link. you
clesarly were curious and tried it.

you're right, it is exactly as you describe: early 90s data used to
support an analysis of the reagan-bush era. so what? i never pretended
it was anything more (or less). in recommending two links to kman, i
suggested he might "find this interesting". whether he does (or did),
is up to him. in recommending these links, i said nothing in support of
(or against) the canadian medical system.

the dutch study was recommended because it takes the discussion of
healthcare systems a notch or two above the name-calling you had
dragged this debate into. i thought kman, like me, could be interested.
note again: no support (or lack of support) for the canadian healthcare
system from me.

you clearly have some kind of bone to pick with the canadian system.
why don't you just get whatever it is, off your chest. i'm sure you'll
feel better. did you not get your mri? was your joint replacement
delayed for 3 months? did your mother die waiting for a cataract
operation? whatever it is: please vent. as it stands, you sound like
you're on the waiting list for some serious psychiatric care. you sound
very bitter.

on the positive side, i'd say there is hope for you. i think this is
the second or third (i'm not counting) post from you where you haven't
invoked the "strawman". trust me, in this regard, you're making real
progress.

cheers,
frtzw906

"BCITORGB" wrote in message
oups.com...
rick, it is you who decided to reply to something i thought
kman might
find interesting. kman indicated an inability to open the link.
you
clesarly were curious and tried it.

you're right, it is exactly as you describe: early 90s data
used to
support an analysis of the reagan-bush era. so what? i never
pretended
it was anything more (or less).
=====================
Yes, you did. You used it as an attempt to claim that anyone
that dared question you was living an insular life, without
benefit of anyknowledge. Problem for you was that it just proved
how provincial you are instead.


in recommending two links to kman, i
suggested he might "find this interesting". whether he does (or
did),
is up to him. in recommending these links, i said nothing in
support of
(or against) the canadian medical system.

the dutch study was recommended because it takes the discussion
of
healthcare systems a notch or two above the name-calling you
had
dragged this debate into. i thought kman, like me, could be
interested.
note again: no support (or lack of support) for the canadian
healthcare
system from me.
================
The dutch study wasn't included in the post I replied to. You
might know that if you didn't delete everything and then pretend
what is in posts.




you clearly have some kind of bone to pick with the canadian
system.
=====================
Nope. I just replied to idiocy that was trying to be spewed by
jingoistic fools.


why don't you just get whatever it is, off your chest. i'm sure
you'll
feel better. did you not get your mri? was your joint
replacement
delayed for 3 months? did your mother die waiting for a
cataract
operation? whatever it is: please vent. as it stands, you sound
like
you're on the waiting list for some serious psychiatric care.
you sound
very bitter.
================
Nope. i suggest that you must be because you cannot post
honestly on the subject. Why is that?


on the positive side, i'd say there is hope for you. i think
this is
the second or third (i'm not counting) post from you where you
haven't
invoked the "strawman". trust me, in this regard, you're making
real
progress.
==================
How would you know? you're still living a delusion and 15 years
in the past. Must have been the best years of your life, and
you've gone steadily downhill since, eh?



cheers,
frtzw906