Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Frank Bell wrote: I think that is the problem with Moyers position. First he lumps all Christians into one pile, sets up a straw man arguement, and then states that we are all wrong. Convienent, but simplistic, and sad commentary about a supposed journalist. But it also represents the error of a lot of liberal thinking, and they then cheer themselves on in their group support meetings. ROFL --riverman (You DO see it, don't you?) Hehehe! Good point :-) It appears that riverman went fishing Frank, so it falls on you to enlighten us who do not see it. I would appreciate your vision of what is so funny. TnT Well, it's just that you take Moyers to task for conveniently and simplistically stating that you're "all" wrong, then you turn right around and use Moyer's example to make a broad, sweeping statement about liberals and their "thinking" yourself! If you're going to accuse Moyers of simplistically lumping people into one pile, then you really ought to avoid doing the same thing yourself, at least in the very next sentence ;-) Reviewing what I said, was that " a lot of liberals" not "all liberals." Also I was refering to specific statements made by Moyer regarding fundementalist Christians, and heartily endorsed by the Hollywood left who have an apparent vitrolic hadred of the FC's. I personally doubt that all liberals would endorse this hadred, and actually would find it abhorent, if they trully understood what some of their spokesmen were advocating. I do appreciate your willingness to be open Frank, and to explain to me my foopahs. If it sounded to you like I was saying all, I would agree that brush is to wide. However it does appear that there are certain voices in this neighborhood who seem to find Moyers statement acceptable, and are also seemingly unwilling to repudiate them. This concerns me if it represnts a deepening divide between reasonble voices. I would on this point hope that I am totally wrong. I would also maintain that this very prevailing attitude is probably what the FC's sense from the liberal establishment, which causes the FC's to seek advocates on the Right, and resulted in the recent Nov vote outcome. Continuing hostility from the left, will not endear the FC's to the liberal cause. If the liberal trully desires to establish any inrodes into the FC camp, he might try an olive branch instead of ROFL. TnT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crimes Against Nature-- RFK, Jr. Interview | General |