Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #3   Report Post  
basskisser
 
Posts: n/a
Default Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary"

John H wrote in message . ..
On 14 Jan 2004 05:05:57 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 13 Jan 2004 04:27:24 -0800,
(basskisser) wrote:


Did you not make the following statement?

************************************************** ********
Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary"
************************************************** *******

Again, the Army War College said nothing. Read the article. The war
college published the report. It didn't write it and disclaimed
agreement with it.


No, I didn't make the above statement. That is a title. I just don't
understand the right. It wouldn't matter if someone caught Bush
killing a cat with his bare hands, on tape, with sound, and perfect
video. You all would still say the person who took the video was a
left wing, unpatriotic liar!!!


In my computer, when I post a new message, I type the title. In doing
so I am making a statement. You, for example, could have titled your
post:

*Jeffrey Record says Iraq "unnecessary"*

But that wouldn't be much of an attention grabber, would it? Therefore
you chose to make the statement you did, which was a lie.

In your example, I would entitle the piece something like:

*Bush kills rabid cat with bare hands, thus protecting hundreds of
spectators who were soon to be bitten*

See how easy it is to be honest?

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!


It is a TITLE, John. Nothing more. Nothing less. Now, if in the body
of the piece, I said that I *knew for a fact* that the War College
says Iraq war unneccessary, that would be different. But, again, your
too far right, with too tight of blinders to see anything but your
BushCo agenda. Again, I can't believe how you rights can't see
anything but that.
  #4   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary"

On 15 Jan 2004 04:33:43 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 14 Jan 2004 05:05:57 -0800,
(basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 13 Jan 2004 04:27:24 -0800,
(basskisser) wrote:


Did you not make the following statement?

************************************************** ********
Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary"
************************************************** *******

+++++++.+ Again, the Army War College said nothing. Read the
article. The war
college published the report. It didn't write it and disclaimed
agreement with it.

No, I didn't make the above statement. That is a title. I just don't
understand the right. It wouldn't matter if someone caught Bush
killing a cat with his bare hands, on tape, with sound, and perfect
video. You all would still say the person who took the video was a
left wing, unpatriotic liar!!!


In my computer, when I post a new message, I type the title. In doing
so I am making a statement. You, for example, could have titled your
post:

*Jeffrey Record says Iraq "unnecessary"*

But that wouldn't be much of an attention grabber, would it? Therefore
you chose to make the statement you did, which was a lie.

In your example, I would entitle the piece something like:

*Bush kills rabid cat with bare hands, thus protecting hundreds of
spectators who were soon to be bitten*

See how easy it is to be honest?

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!


It is a TITLE, John. Nothing more. Nothing less. Now, if in the body
of the piece, I said that I *knew for a fact* that the War College
says Iraq war unneccessary, that would be different. But, again, your
too far right, with too tight of blinders to see anything but your
BushCo agenda. Again, I can't believe how you rights can't see
anything but that.


So, if I wrote a title which said,

Basskisser is full of "****"

and then went on in the body of the piece to say something different,
there would be no problem?

You made a statement of fact in your title. That was a false
statement.

Again, my comments regarding your statement do not reflect my
leanings. If name-calling ("too tight of blinders") helps your
self-esteem, go for it.


John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!
  #5   Report Post  
basskisser
 
Posts: n/a
Default Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary"

John H wrote in message . ..
On 15 Jan 2004 04:33:43 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 14 Jan 2004 05:05:57 -0800,
(basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 13 Jan 2004 04:27:24 -0800,
(basskisser) wrote:


Did you not make the following statement?

************************************************** ********
Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary"
************************************************** *******

+++++++.+ Again, the Army War College said nothing. Read the
article. The war
college published the report. It didn't write it and disclaimed
agreement with it.

No, I didn't make the above statement. That is a title. I just don't
understand the right. It wouldn't matter if someone caught Bush
killing a cat with his bare hands, on tape, with sound, and perfect
video. You all would still say the person who took the video was a
left wing, unpatriotic liar!!!

In my computer, when I post a new message, I type the title. In doing
so I am making a statement. You, for example, could have titled your
post:

*Jeffrey Record says Iraq "unnecessary"*

But that wouldn't be much of an attention grabber, would it? Therefore
you chose to make the statement you did, which was a lie.

In your example, I would entitle the piece something like:

*Bush kills rabid cat with bare hands, thus protecting hundreds of
spectators who were soon to be bitten*

See how easy it is to be honest?

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!


It is a TITLE, John. Nothing more. Nothing less. Now, if in the body
of the piece, I said that I *knew for a fact* that the War College
says Iraq war unneccessary, that would be different. But, again, your
too far right, with too tight of blinders to see anything but your
BushCo agenda. Again, I can't believe how you rights can't see
anything but that.


So, if I wrote a title which said,

Basskisser is full of "****"

and then went on in the body of the piece to say something different,
there would be no problem?


Nope, if there was no implication of truth in the body, there
wouldn't. In this case, there is.

You made a statement of fact in your title. That was a false
statement.

Again, my comments regarding your statement do not reflect my
leanings. If name-calling ("too tight of blinders") helps your
self-esteem, go for it.


I think everybody here knows which way YOU lean!


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT--U.N. Unanimously Adopts Iraq Resolution NOYB General 1 October 17th 03 05:36 AM
OT--Don't play politics on Iraq NOYB General 42 October 9th 03 02:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017