| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary"
John H wrote in message . ..
On 13 Jan 2004 04:27:24 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 12 Jan 2004 10:43:29 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: Washington -- A scathing new report published by the Army War College broadly criticizes the Bush administration's handling of the war on terrorism, accusing it of taking a detour into an "unnecessary" war in Iraq and pursuing an "unrealistic" quest against terrorism that may lead to U.S. wars with states that pose no serious threat. The Army War College said nothing. Read the article. The war college published the report. It didn't write it and disclaimed agreement with it. Why lie? Uh, I think you're beginning to loose it there, John. I didn't write the article, so how could I lie? Did you not make the following statement? ************************************************** ******** Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary" ************************************************** ******* Again, the Army War College said nothing. Read the article. The war college published the report. It didn't write it and disclaimed agreement with it. No, I didn't make the above statement. That is a title. I just don't understand the right. It wouldn't matter if someone caught Bush killing a cat with his bare hands, on tape, with sound, and perfect video. You all would still say the person who took the video was a left wing, unpatriotic liar!!! |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary"
On 14 Jan 2004 05:05:57 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:
John H wrote in message . .. On 13 Jan 2004 04:27:24 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: Did you not make the following statement? ************************************************** ******** Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary" ************************************************** ******* Again, the Army War College said nothing. Read the article. The war college published the report. It didn't write it and disclaimed agreement with it. No, I didn't make the above statement. That is a title. I just don't understand the right. It wouldn't matter if someone caught Bush killing a cat with his bare hands, on tape, with sound, and perfect video. You all would still say the person who took the video was a left wing, unpatriotic liar!!! In my computer, when I post a new message, I type the title. In doing so I am making a statement. You, for example, could have titled your post: *Jeffrey Record says Iraq "unnecessary"* But that wouldn't be much of an attention grabber, would it? Therefore you chose to make the statement you did, which was a lie. In your example, I would entitle the piece something like: *Bush kills rabid cat with bare hands, thus protecting hundreds of spectators who were soon to be bitten* See how easy it is to be honest? John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary"
John H wrote in message . ..
On 14 Jan 2004 05:05:57 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 13 Jan 2004 04:27:24 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: Did you not make the following statement? ************************************************** ******** Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary" ************************************************** ******* Again, the Army War College said nothing. Read the article. The war college published the report. It didn't write it and disclaimed agreement with it. No, I didn't make the above statement. That is a title. I just don't understand the right. It wouldn't matter if someone caught Bush killing a cat with his bare hands, on tape, with sound, and perfect video. You all would still say the person who took the video was a left wing, unpatriotic liar!!! In my computer, when I post a new message, I type the title. In doing so I am making a statement. You, for example, could have titled your post: *Jeffrey Record says Iraq "unnecessary"* But that wouldn't be much of an attention grabber, would it? Therefore you chose to make the statement you did, which was a lie. In your example, I would entitle the piece something like: *Bush kills rabid cat with bare hands, thus protecting hundreds of spectators who were soon to be bitten* See how easy it is to be honest? John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! It is a TITLE, John. Nothing more. Nothing less. Now, if in the body of the piece, I said that I *knew for a fact* that the War College says Iraq war unneccessary, that would be different. But, again, your too far right, with too tight of blinders to see anything but your BushCo agenda. Again, I can't believe how you rights can't see anything but that. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary"
On 15 Jan 2004 04:33:43 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:
John H wrote in message . .. On 14 Jan 2004 05:05:57 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 13 Jan 2004 04:27:24 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: Did you not make the following statement? ************************************************** ******** Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary" ************************************************** ******* +++++++.+ Again, the Army War College said nothing. Read the article. The war college published the report. It didn't write it and disclaimed agreement with it. No, I didn't make the above statement. That is a title. I just don't understand the right. It wouldn't matter if someone caught Bush killing a cat with his bare hands, on tape, with sound, and perfect video. You all would still say the person who took the video was a left wing, unpatriotic liar!!! In my computer, when I post a new message, I type the title. In doing so I am making a statement. You, for example, could have titled your post: *Jeffrey Record says Iraq "unnecessary"* But that wouldn't be much of an attention grabber, would it? Therefore you chose to make the statement you did, which was a lie. In your example, I would entitle the piece something like: *Bush kills rabid cat with bare hands, thus protecting hundreds of spectators who were soon to be bitten* See how easy it is to be honest? John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! It is a TITLE, John. Nothing more. Nothing less. Now, if in the body of the piece, I said that I *knew for a fact* that the War College says Iraq war unneccessary, that would be different. But, again, your too far right, with too tight of blinders to see anything but your BushCo agenda. Again, I can't believe how you rights can't see anything but that. So, if I wrote a title which said, Basskisser is full of "****" and then went on in the body of the piece to say something different, there would be no problem? You made a statement of fact in your title. That was a false statement. Again, my comments regarding your statement do not reflect my leanings. If name-calling ("too tight of blinders") helps your self-esteem, go for it. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary"
John H wrote in message . ..
On 15 Jan 2004 04:33:43 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 14 Jan 2004 05:05:57 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 13 Jan 2004 04:27:24 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: Did you not make the following statement? ************************************************** ******** Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary" ************************************************** ******* +++++++.+ Again, the Army War College said nothing. Read the article. The war college published the report. It didn't write it and disclaimed agreement with it. No, I didn't make the above statement. That is a title. I just don't understand the right. It wouldn't matter if someone caught Bush killing a cat with his bare hands, on tape, with sound, and perfect video. You all would still say the person who took the video was a left wing, unpatriotic liar!!! In my computer, when I post a new message, I type the title. In doing so I am making a statement. You, for example, could have titled your post: *Jeffrey Record says Iraq "unnecessary"* But that wouldn't be much of an attention grabber, would it? Therefore you chose to make the statement you did, which was a lie. In your example, I would entitle the piece something like: *Bush kills rabid cat with bare hands, thus protecting hundreds of spectators who were soon to be bitten* See how easy it is to be honest? John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! It is a TITLE, John. Nothing more. Nothing less. Now, if in the body of the piece, I said that I *knew for a fact* that the War College says Iraq war unneccessary, that would be different. But, again, your too far right, with too tight of blinders to see anything but your BushCo agenda. Again, I can't believe how you rights can't see anything but that. So, if I wrote a title which said, Basskisser is full of "****" and then went on in the body of the piece to say something different, there would be no problem? Nope, if there was no implication of truth in the body, there wouldn't. In this case, there is. You made a statement of fact in your title. That was a false statement. Again, my comments regarding your statement do not reflect my leanings. If name-calling ("too tight of blinders") helps your self-esteem, go for it. I think everybody here knows which way YOU lean! |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Army War College says Iraq "unneccesary"
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| OT--U.N. Unanimously Adopts Iraq Resolution | General | |||
| OT--Don't play politics on Iraq | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
