On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:24:07 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

Maybe this will make John content:

Army War College Believes Some of Its Personnel May Have a Valid Point,
Considering Their Unusual Category of Education

Is that vague enough? :-)

Not sure. What is it you're trying to say? Are you trying to say the
Army War College is anti-administration and anti-Bush as evidenced by
the article published in its magazine? OK, say it. Suppose the
two-star who is in charge of the Army War College is anti-Bush. So
what? He is allowed to be. He can disagree with policies, especially
if he's not in a position where he either executes the order or
resigns. This is a free country.

About three weeks ago, I wrote a letter to the Washington Post
questioning the credibility of one of their journalists. The letter
was published. Does this mean the Washington Post no longer believes
in the credibility of said journalist?

Maybe more of the old much ado about nothing?

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!