On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:44:51 -0500, hkrause wrote:

Jim Hertvik is a boatless dweeb from Avon Lake, Ohio. What could he
possibly know about anything?

================================

Srangely enough the town is hard by the shores of lake eerie...

Nowhere near Columbus however where your namesake wannabe traces back
to.

wrote:
Hurtwit wrote:


I was referring to a previous boat review of his

***************

But unable to point out even a single inaccuracy, and unable to
formulate a contrary opinion,
you reduced your comment to your specialty, personal attack. Thinking
of buying a boat again, one of these days, Hurtwit, or are you going to
be one of the bitter old non-boating reactionaries with no purpose here
and nothing to contribute exept negativity and bile?


Woohoo the political OT king & spam man Gould still tries to bend the
truth?? sorry Chuckles you claimed a boat has a hand laid hull when it
plain just didn't!!! you also went along with a 20ft wl boat being
billed as a 26ftr, which is a stretch in more ways than one:-) But why
the deceptions?? are you just an inexperienced simpleton, not unusual in
used car salesmen nor used boat spruikers; or bent?? that's the only 2
options you really have at this stage.

So post your evidence that the boat does indeed have a "hand laid hull"
& I'll post my rejoinder pasted from the makers own web site, then I
guess the question will be answered, just as it was with another of your
little "fudges" the 28ft full cabin boat doing 18 knts on "about" 6 gals
per hour, or were they Gould gallons????? the same Gould gallons that
have helped you fudge every time???? You just parrot marketing BS,
nothing less!!!

Just about all your so called "articles" are just deceptive marketing spam.

K

So the Krause lie of the day??? Here ya go:-)

So just getting back to the Hatt 43 lie:-) What happened was at
least 2 of the NG people lived near where he "claimed" he did & said
they'd settle if he owned a Hatt 43 or not by simply calling around &
taking a look:-) After all his usual abuse & fained "privacy" concerns
it was starting to look like his lying hide was about to be hung out to
dry:-)

This would be more than his ego could even contemplate, so in his
desperation not to be caught red handed (again:-)) he then lied again;
which despite it being totally unbelievable it allowed his damaged mind
to think he was still the big man his lies had created:-)

Doubt save to organise employment wrecking union strokes he's never
even been to Florida but he desperately needed to get away from the lie
mansion & the lie Hatt 43:-)





We had the Hatteras for two years. Last year, out of the cold clear,
a broker approached me with an offer to buy. Our continued Florida
lifestyle was somewhat up in the air, because the two breadwinners
hereabouts were about to be offered long-term but temporary assignments
they could not refuse in the Washington, D.C., area. So, after being
romanced a little, we sold the Hatt for almost precisely what we paid
for it. Not bad, after two full years of use. And I mean full years. So,
we didn't "make" any money off the Hatt, but we didn't lose any, either.
The proceeds were prudently invested.

wrote:
SNAFU wrote:

imH,

Obviously you did not read the original post. If Chuck is hyping boat
builders, why is he writing an article about a boat built 38 years ago?

From the post at the top of the thread: "Among many hundreds of
designs, he
drew this month's NW Classic, 'My Gal', built in 1967 at Vic Franck's
Boatyard on Portage Bay."

*********************************

Hurtwit doesn't need a *real* excuse to make personal attacks. He's got
a mental hard-on right now because Karen Smith is once again on the
loose, and he thinks he has a new "ally" in his cause. :-)


I'm not on the loose:-) I'm merely reviewing your spamming BS & calling
it for what it is:-)

What's really sad is that most here just accept & swallow the marketing
crap you dish up.

But hey this is easily settled you need to deal with my objections, is
it a hand laid hull??? give us the proof after all it's your article
surely you will be glad to show that you tell the truth??? while you're
at it with a WL beam of 7 1/2 ft & Wl of 20; is it something fairly
billed as a 26ftr???

No spam man if you want to run deceptive ads here expect them to be
reviewed & as always I'll give the fullest of reasons why I say what I
say so you can actually answer, instead of BS around around about how
mean it is to call your ads as they are.

So which is it Gould just dumb as dog dirt or outright bent??

K

So the Krause lie of the day??? Here ya go:-)

So just getting back to the Hatt 43 lie:-) What happened was at
least 2 of the NG people lived near where he "claimed" he did & said
they'd settle if he owned a Hatt 43 or not by simply calling around &
taking a look:-) After all his usual abuse & fained "privacy" concerns
it was starting to look like his lying hide was about to be hung out to
dry:-)

This would be more than his ego could even contemplate, so in his
desperation not to be caught red handed (again:-)) he then lied again;
which despite it being totally unbelievable it allowed his damaged mind
to think he was still the big man his lies had created:-)

Doubt save to organise employment wrecking union strokes he's never
even been to Florida but he desperately needed to get away from the lie
mansion & the lie Hatt 43:-)





We had the Hatteras for two years. Last year, out of the cold clear,
a broker approached me with an offer to buy. Our continued Florida
lifestyle was somewhat up in the air, because the two breadwinners
hereabouts were about to be offered long-term but temporary assignments
they could not refuse in the Washington, D.C., area. So, after being
romanced a little, we sold the Hatt for almost precisely what we paid
for it. Not bad, after two full years of use. And I mean full years. So,
we didn't "make" any money off the Hatt, but we didn't lose any, either.
The proceeds were prudently invested.

This article was not a boat review, it was a fluff piece for a magazine
whose existence is dependent upon the advertisers for the same products they
are reviewing.

It is possible the boat is the ideal boat, but you will never be able to
tell from a "boat review" in a boating magazine. Anyone who uses a boating
magazine as a basis for purchasing a boat, gets what he deserves.


John H" wrote in message
news
On 6 Feb 2005 09:25:36 -0800, wrote:

Hurtwit wrote:


I was referring to a previous boat review of his

***************

But unable to point out even a single inaccuracy, and unable to
formulate a contrary opinion,
you reduced your comment to your specialty, personal attack. Thinking
of buying a boat again, one of these days, Hurtwit, or are you going to
be one of the bitter old non-boating reactionaries with no purpose here
and nothing to contribute exept negativity and bile?

Chuck, I noticed not one derogatory comment about the 260 Defiance, nor
did I
notice a comparison to any other boats. How would you compare the 260
Defiance
and the 26' Osprey Fisherman? Or, for that matter, any of the other 26'
boat
made in the northwest. Is the 260 Defiance a better boat than many other
brands.
Why, or why not?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Harry,
Is that a nice thing to say?

"hkrause" wrote in message
news:1107729892.0a0731585ea452faddcfba24e18fe348@t eranews...
Snafu wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

Nice spin. Nice try. No cigar Chucky.

Now go get that stash of hundred dollar bills slipped under your door
last
night by XX Boat Company and finish your "unbiased" review of their boat.
Remember, nothing but positives and do remember to stretch the truth as

much

as possible. Oh those advertising dollars from XX Boat Company will

surely

start to sprout.



JimH,

Obviously you did not read the original post. If Chuck is hyping boat
builders, why is he writing an article about a boat built 38 years ago?
From the post at the top of the thread: "Among many hundreds of designs,
he
drew this month's NW Classic, 'My Gal', built in 1967 at Vic Franck's
Boatyard on Portage Bay."



Jim Hertvik is a boatless dweeb from Avon Lake, Ohio. What could he
possibly know about anything?

Harry Krause wrote:

That's your area of expertise, right, Smith? Accepting and
swallowing?

Now I don't care WHO you are....that's FUNNY!!

Harry Krause wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:


That's your area of expertise, right, Smith? Accepting and

swallowing?

Now I don't care WHO you are....that's FUNNY!!


In her heyday, Smith was a three bagger.

Triple latex, also!

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Hurtwit protested:

You are the one who needs to get help Chuck. You have gone over
the
deep
edge. And you may want to grow up also. Making fun of someone's
name
was
something one did in 2nd grade......you apparently never got past
that
stage.

*********************

Were you in second grade earlier today when you called me "Chucky"?

What grade were you in when you posted that I have people shoving
$100
bills under my door?
You cannot take what you dish out. What a little girl.

What goes around, comes around, so enjoy. When your Dutch, German,
or
whatever name is anglicized, it translates as Hurtwit. If you have
a
problem with that, take it up with your ancestors. :-)


Grow up. You are indeed Chucky till you do.

Hmm, that's odd. Why don't you tell Fritz to "grow up"?

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


One and the same. We called them triple-baggers.

Now now...the lady 'gave her all' for the US Fleet at Perth. That should
account for something.

On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:35:42 -0500, "Dr. Karen Grear MD, PHD"
wrote:

Is that a nice thing to say?

=============================

What kind of boat do you have Dr. Karen?