"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

John H wrote:
On 7 Feb 2005 11:42:03 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On 7 Feb 2005 04:48:12 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


John wrote:
On 4 Feb 2005 10:24:52 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message

ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message

groups.com...

Harry Krause wrote:
Some Guy wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in
message

No problem. Treason is a traitorous act, and a
traitor
is
the
person
committing the traitorous act.


That much is obvious, but your chosen usage
belies a
poor
grasp
of
your
[presumably] native language, if not, as so
often
in
the
past,
the
facts of
a particular issue.


And here we have another "anonymous" buttwiper
logging
in
with
his
latest rec.boats ID...

Sort of like Basskisser, jps, bb and the likes?


Remember the liebral playbook rules......liebrals
are
allowed
to
do
what
they complain about others doing........in
asslicker's
case,
it
just
reaffirms his title of 'King of the NG idiots"

Fritz, what have I complained about others doing,
that I
do?
Huh?
By the way, I notice that you still don't have the
mental
capacity
to
post like an adult, and refrain from childish name
calling.
Do
you
honestly think that people take you with ANY
credibility
when
you
act
infantile?


Bassy said "you still don't have the mental capacity
to
post
like
an
adult" then warned others they should "refrain from
childish
name
calling".

You are a real trip Bassy.


Asslicker talking about credibility......LMAO

Well, then, Fritz, please, show what credible thing you've
posted.
Now,
I'm not talking about what you've posted in your usenet
support
groups
for help in raising your kid or with your divorce.

His last post seemed credible. I could understand why he
was
laughing
his a$$ off.

John H

Really? What names DID I call Fritz?

He said nothing about calling names in that post. He said
"LMAO." I

believe this
means he felt something was humorous. Having read the
previous
posts, I
found
this statement very believeable, and therefore, credible.

I think his FAS is acting up.

Please show what facts you have to back up your wild allegations.
Here's your chance, Fritz. Prove to the usenet world that you
ARE,
indeed, credible. Can you?

I am sure he researched and verified his 'facts' as well as the
Washington Post
does!

John H

In case you don't know, and apparently you don't, if a newspaper
prints
lies, etc., they are opening themselves up to lawsuits, libel, and
slander.


Sort of like the legal issues Dan Rather and the CBS Evening News
face?
Remind me again of the details of those lawsuits.

Hmm, let me get this straight. You think that because there AREN'T any,
that someone chose to not push the issue, perhaps because there WAS
truth in it, that that automatically means that they couldn't have been
sued? Are you really saying that Jim?


I don't know because only God knows what you just said.