Anyone interested in a slightly damaged submarine?
Contact the Canadian Navy. See item on HMCS Chicoutimi.
http://novascotia.cbc.ca/

A damaged non functional submarine? Sell it to the candians...
No wait they bought it already

Matt (whose tax money paid for this BS)

A damaged non functional submarine? Sell it to the candians...
No wait they bought it already

Matt (whose tax money paid for this BS)

On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 23:58:22 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:

Anyone interested in a slightly damaged submarine?
Contact the Canadian Navy. See item on HMCS Chicoutimi.
http://novascotia.cbc.ca/



mebbe a volume purchase? toss in the USS san francisco?

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 23:58:22 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:

Anyone interested in a slightly damaged submarine?
Contact the Canadian Navy. See item on HMCS Chicoutimi.
http://novascotia.cbc.ca/


I was the head design administrator for that sub. The equipment I
recommended for install while in dry dock, would have prevented this
accident, but the company thought the cost was too high, and it was
passed over.

I then sold off all that stock, and it made for a tidy down payment,
on my 155' Donzi.

Most likely it was not a problem with the sub but with the submariners
operating it. Maybe a modern, high-tech submarine is too complicated
for Canadians to operate.

Me, I'll wait until the report is released next month before making any
conclusions.

wrote in message
oups.com...
Most likely it was not a problem with the sub but with the submariners
operating it. Maybe a modern, high-tech submarine is too complicated
for Canadians to operate.

Me, I'll wait until the report is released next month before making any
conclusions.


Sounds like you already have dipstick.