You're wasting time that could have been spent on the quiz.

We have all the time in the world.

But where did you get this test?
Who wrote it?

These questions are purely evasive. You could easily
find out for yourself if you were really interested,
but we all know you're not; the questions are pure
evasion, nothing more.

I did a quick google and found nothing.
I'm not going to spend more time on that.
You could just simply answer. Are you
afraid that revealing the source might
discredit the test?

Maybe your answers
will make me interested in taking the
test.

No. We all know it, too. Your refusal to take the
quiz has nothing to do with my refusal to say anything
about the origin of the quiz. Your refusal to take the
quiz is based solely on your irrational fear.

I'm starting to suspect that you made up
this test yourself, and probably have all
kinds of wacky ideas about what the
answers IMPLY, eh? Am I close on this
one?

Another thing that might make
me interested in it, is if approx. 100
other veg*ns took the test too.

Thanks for admitting that you're a mindless sheep.

Sometimes I'm willing to be part of a
statistic taking test.

What's to be afraid of?

Exactly! But nonetheless, you are. That's why your
fear is irrational.

But I'm not afraid. I question the test's source
and validity. I also question why you're so
hung up on ME is partiicular taking the test.


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.

Scented Nectar wrote:

You're wasting time that could have been spent on the quiz.


We have all the time in the world.

You do. Your time is worth very little.



But where did you get this test?
Who wrote it?

These questions are purely evasive. You could easily
find out for yourself if you were really interested,
but we all know you're not; the questions are pure
evasion, nothing more.


I did a quick google and found nothing.

Bull****. *I* did a quick Google and found literally
HUNDREDS of references.

I'm not going to spend more time on that.

You didn't spend any.

You could just simply answer.

I could, but it would be pointless, because your
refusal to take the quiz has nothing to do with my
failure to tell you. It ONLY has to do with fear, and
now stubbornness.

Are you
afraid that revealing the source might
discredit the test?

Not in the least.



Maybe your answers
will make me interested in taking the
test.

No. We all know it, too. Your refusal to take the
quiz has nothing to do with my refusal to say anything
about the origin of the quiz. Your refusal to take the
quiz is based solely on your irrational fear.


I'm starting to suspect that you made up
this test yourself,

Nope. I wish I could take credit for it, but I can't.

and probably have all
kinds of wacky ideas about what the
answers IMPLY, eh? Am I close on this
one?


Another thing that might make
me interested in it, is if approx. 100
other veg*ns took the test too.

Thanks for admitting that you're a mindless sheep.


Sometimes I'm willing to be part of a
statistic taking test.

This test does not gather statistics in any way. It's
usenet, you idiot. I know that that snarky cocksucker
Ron explicitly talked about the test being "at a
website", but he GOT THAT WRONG.



What's to be afraid of?

Exactly! But nonetheless, you are. That's why your
fear is irrational.


But I'm not afraid.

Yes, you are.

I question the test's source
and validity.

No, you don't. You don't care about its source and
validity. That's just your time-wasting smokescreen.
Thanks again for demonstrating you're a liar: the test
being a waste of time is of no concern to you.

We have all the time in the world.

You do. Your time is worth very little.

Little to you, a lot to me. That's why I
only do things that I want on this news
group. Your test isn't one of them.

Bull****. *I* did a quick Google and found literally
HUNDREDS of references.

I'm not going to spend more time on that.

You didn't spend any.

I did. What were your search criteria? I
likely had wrong ones.

You could just simply answer.

I could, but it would be pointless, because your
refusal to take the quiz has nothing to do with my
failure to tell you. It ONLY has to do with fear, and
now stubbornness.

Are you
afraid that revealing the source might
discredit the test?

Not in the least.

Well, cough it up then.

I'm starting to suspect that you made up
this test yourself,

Nope. I wish I could take credit for it, but I can't.

Sometimes I'm willing to be part of a
statistic taking test.

This test does not gather statistics in any way. It's
usenet, you idiot. I know that that snarky cocksucker
Ron explicitly talked about the test being "at a
website", but he GOT THAT WRONG.

If it does not gather statistics, then what's
it for? You said it would tell whether every
vegan was leftwing like you say. So, would
that not involve getting the statistics through
the test? What else is it for?

I question the test's source
and validity.

No, you don't. You don't care about its source and
validity. That's just your time-wasting smokescreen.
Thanks again for demonstrating you're a liar: the test
being a waste of time is of no concern to you.

What are you hiding about it's source, or maybe
a better question, why are you hiding it's source?


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.

Scented Nectar wrote:

We have all the time in the world.

You do. Your time is worth very little.


Little to you, a lot to me.

Little to everyone else. You have a low-skill,
low-wage job.

In any case, it's worth little enough to you that you
don't mind ****ing away hours of every day here
engaging in totally off-topic blather.

That's why I
only do things that I want on this news
group. Your test isn't one of them.

Fear.



Bull****. *I* did a quick Google and found literally
HUNDREDS of references.


I'm not going to spend more time on that.

You didn't spend any.


I did.

You did.

What were your search criteria? I
likely had wrong ones.

What were they? You're clueless. You wouldn't know
how to do an effective Google search if your life
depended on it. That kind of ineffectiveness is why
you're low-wage.



You could just simply answer.

I could, but it would be pointless, because your
refusal to take the quiz has nothing to do with my
failure to tell you. It ONLY has to do with fear, and
now stubbornness.

I'm right: your refusal has nothing to do with my
failure to answer. Your demands to know the origin of
the test are specious.



Are you
afraid that revealing the source might
discredit the test?

Not in the least.


Well, cough it up then.

Do a REAL search and find it for yourself.



I'm starting to suspect that you made up
this test yourself,

Nope. I wish I could take credit for it, but I can't.


Sometimes I'm willing to be part of a
statistic taking test.

This test does not gather statistics in any way. It's
usenet, you idiot. I know that that snarky cocksucker
Ron explicitly talked about the test being "at a
website", but he GOT THAT WRONG.


If it does not gather statistics, then what's
it for?

Discussion, right here in usenet.

You said it would tell whether every
vegan was leftwing like you say.

No, I didn't say that at all.

So, would
that not involve getting the statistics through
the test? What else is it for?

Nothing else. There are websites, in fact, where you
can take the test, but:

1. I'm not asking you to go to them;
2. They don't collect any personal info.



I question the test's source
and validity.

No, you don't. You don't care about its source and
validity. That's just your time-wasting smokescreen.
Thanks again for demonstrating you're a liar: the test
being a waste of time is of no concern to you.


What are you hiding about it's source,

Nothing. I'm just not letting you get away with your
bull**** excuse. You don't care about the source, and
we all know it.

or maybe a better question,

No, a typically stupid and evasive question.

why are you hiding it's source?

I'm not. The source is right out there, all over the
web. Actually, there are literally dozens of sources.

And write "its" when you mean possessive: its source,
not "it's". "It's" is the contraction of "it is". You
stupid ****.

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:49:34 -0500, "Scented Nectar"
wrote:

Could you guys please delete rec.boats from your cross posting list?
That would be nice.

Thank you.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:49:34 -0500, "Scented Nectar"
wrote:

Could you guys please delete rec.boats from your cross posting list?
That would be nice.

Thank you.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Sorry about that. One of the resident
trolls in the vegetarian groups cross
posted to an off topic group. I'll snip
it from my future replies to this troll.

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:52:25 -0500, "Scented Nectar"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:49:34 -0500, "Scented Nectar"
wrote:

Could you guys please delete rec.boats from your cross posting list?
That would be nice.

Thank you.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

Sorry about that. One of the resident
trolls in the vegetarian groups cross
posted to an off topic group. I'll snip
it from my future replies to this troll.


Thanks, man, you're an angel!
John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes