On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably around
somewhere.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe
you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who
made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated
that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably around
somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated that he
said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were erroneous.
Which is it?

On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe
you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who
made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated
that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably around
somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated that he
said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were erroneous.
Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JohnH wrote:
On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error,
then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam",
as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise?
After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far?
Maybe
you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one
who
made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated
that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably
around
somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated that
he
said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were
erroneous.
Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H

Man, are you for real? Are you really THAT uncapable of following a
thread that YOU initiated? Okay, let's try again, perhaps you will
understand.
YOU, John, stated that Harry had said in the past that he "identified
bodies in VietNam". So, you attributed a quote to Harry. Prove that.
I didn't attribute ANY quote to Harry. I simply stated that he didn't
say what YOU attributed to him. Seeing that YOU initiated a post that
stated that Harry had said he "identified bodies in VietNam", the
burden of proof is on you. Now, you could always admit you posted that
in ignorance, not knowing WHAT Harry had said regarding that subject.

On 3 Feb 2005 05:00:59 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error,
then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam",
as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise?
After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far?
Maybe
you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one
who
made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated
that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably
around
somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated that
he
said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were
erroneous.
Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H

Man, are you for real? Are you really THAT uncapable of following a
thread that YOU initiated? Okay, let's try again, perhaps you will
understand.
YOU, John, stated that Harry had said in the past that he "identified
bodies in VietNam". So, you attributed a quote to Harry. Prove that.
I didn't attribute ANY quote to Harry. I simply stated that he didn't
say what YOU attributed to him. Seeing that YOU initiated a post that
stated that Harry had said he "identified bodies in VietNam", the
burden of proof is on you. Now, you could always admit you posted that
in ignorance, not knowing WHAT Harry had said regarding that subject.

I'm not even sure what subject you're talking about. I *thought* he
said he identified bodies in Vietnam. If he didn't say that, as you
seem to think, then what did he say?

What *did* he do with bodies in Vietnam?

You seem pretty knowledgeable on any subject, so you should be a great
source for the information. Did I start this thread? Was this before
or after I promised not to call Harry any more names?

Did you watch President Bush give one of the greatest State of the
Union addresses of all time last night. I sure hope so. I can
understand why you are looking to change party affiliation now. The
Republicans will welcome you, but you may have to clean up your act a
little. As I am an independent, I can't tell you everything you have
to do to qualify.

Now, to the real question: A stone is dropped into a pond, the ripples
forming concentric circles which expand. At what rate is the area of
one of these circles increasing when the radius is 4 m and increasing
at the rate of 0.5 m/s?

I'm thinking of putting a pond in my back yard in which to raise
flounder, so this question is on topic.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes