wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:
That's news to me. Which member of the Bush administration said that?
*************
John R. Bolton, Undersecretary for Arms Control. September, 2003


===========
Hmmm......John Bolton, September 2003.


I could have sworn you just said "Even the Bush administration now
admits
that it is extremely unlikely that WMD were removed to a neighboring
country."


Interesting how you continue to make up stories or stretch the truth in

order to support your agenda or thesis.

***************

Be sure to support the next school bond in your district.


"The Bush Administration" includes not only GWB, but his VP, cabinet,
etc. Look it up.

wrote in message
ups.com...
wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:
That's news to me. Which member of the Bush administration said that?
*************
John R. Bolton, Undersecretary for Arms Control. September, 2003


===========
Hmmm......John Bolton, September 2003.


I could have sworn you just said "Even the Bush administration now
admits
that it is extremely unlikely that WMD were removed to a neighboring
country."


Interesting how you continue to make up stories or stretch the truth in

order to support your agenda or thesis.

***************

Be sure to support the next school bond in your district.


"The Bush Administration" includes not only GWB, but his VP, cabinet,
etc. Look it up.


I realize that. Perhaps the emphasis should have been on the
date..."September, 2003". You did say, did you not,
"even the Bush Administration *now* admits..."?

So *now* can be some 15 months in the past?

I stand by my previous comment Chuck.

wrote in message
ups.com...
wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:
That's news to me. Which member of the Bush administration said that?
*************
John R. Bolton, Undersecretary for Arms Control. September, 2003


===========
Hmmm......John Bolton, September 2003.


I could have sworn you just said "Even the Bush administration now
admits
that it is extremely unlikely that WMD were removed to a neighboring
country."


Interesting how you continue to make up stories or stretch the truth in

order to support your agenda or thesis.

***************

Be sure to support the next school bond in your district.


"The Bush Administration" includes not only GWB, but his VP, cabinet,
etc. Look it up.


BTW, if you notice my replies to your posts they are done without insults to
you. Why do you continue to find it necessary to throw the juvenile insults
towards me Chuck?

BTW, if you notice my replies to your posts they are done without insults to
you.

An accusation of lying is not an insult?

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
BTW, if you notice my replies to your posts they are done without insults
to
you.

An accusation of lying is not an insult?



Not if it is the truth, which it is.

Not if it is the truth, which it is.

So, if I said "You're an asshole", and I thought it was the truth, that
wouldn't be an insult?

One of your central problems could be a tendency to automatically elevate your
own opinions to the category of unassailable truth. Under those standards, you
could never insult anybody- no matter what you said. Under the same standards,
you could easily be personally offended when people said things you considered
untrue, (only because they didn't fit your preferred view of the universe).

************


There's a huge difference between the Christian right and the right Christians
http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/content/ne...41012bsh.shtml

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Not if it is the truth, which it is.

So, if I said "You're an asshole", and I thought it was the truth, that
wouldn't be an insult?

One of your central problems could be a tendency to automatically elevate
your
own opinions to the category of unassailable truth. Under those standards,
you
could never insult anybody- no matter what you said. Under the same
standards,
you could easily be personally offended when people said things you
considered
untrue, (only because they didn't fit your preferred view of the
universe).


Pot-kettle-black