BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/2678-submarines-car-engines-displacement.html)

Steven Shelikoff January 7th 04 04:47 AM

Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
 
On 07 Jan 2004 02:52:36 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

8 years on submarines and it is bottom of keel. Most
subs read about 65 feet at periscope depth which has
the sail about 5 to 10 feet below the surface.


Fascinating. What does the depth indicator say when the sub is surfaced?
Obviously it would not be zero.


That would depend on how far it surfaced. Did it blow all ballast or is
it just barely surfaced?

Steve

Wayne.B January 7th 04 05:20 AM

Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
 
On 07 Jan 2004 02:52:36 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Fascinating. What does the depth indicator say when the sub is surfaced?
Obviously it would not be zero.


We used to see subs on the surface all the time in eastern Long Island
Sound (sub base at Groton, CT). Only the conning tower and maybe 6
to 8 feet of hull is exposed at most when they are surfaced.
Estimating that the conning tower is submerged by 10 feet at periscope
depth, the height of the tower at 20 feet, plus 8 feet of hull - that
would put you about 38 feet above the periscope depth reading.

If you motor up the Thames River from New London, CT, you can actually
see partially assembled cross sections of subs on dry land. They look
incredibly big, even from a distance. And you really don't want to
take a lot of pictures or try to get closer. :-)


Rick January 7th 04 05:29 AM

Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
 
Gould 0738 wrote:

It wouldn't seem logical, otherwise.


Posting an answer to something I know nothing about is illogical.

Rick


Calif Bill January 7th 04 06:30 AM

Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
 

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On 07 Jan 2004 02:52:36 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Fascinating. What does the depth indicator say when the sub is surfaced?
Obviously it would not be zero.


We used to see subs on the surface all the time in eastern Long Island
Sound (sub base at Groton, CT). Only the conning tower and maybe 6
to 8 feet of hull is exposed at most when they are surfaced.
Estimating that the conning tower is submerged by 10 feet at periscope
depth, the height of the tower at 20 feet, plus 8 feet of hull - that
would put you about 38 feet above the periscope depth reading.

If you motor up the Thames River from New London, CT, you can actually
see partially assembled cross sections of subs on dry land. They look
incredibly big, even from a distance. And you really don't want to
take a lot of pictures or try to get closer. :-)


Even worse is to be boating when a sub comes by on the surface. The bow
wake is HUGE! Have to be careful when one is entering or exiting SF Bay to
avoid being swamped. Normal is a CG escort, so there is warning.
Bill



Gould 0738 January 7th 04 08:04 AM

Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
 
Fascinating. What does the depth indicator say when the sub is surfaced?
Obviously it would not be zero.


That would depend on how far it surfaced. Did it blow all ballast or is
it just barely surfaced?

Steve



It can't blow enough ballast to put the keel on the surface. My point is merely
that if the depth is measured between the surface and the keel, (and I have no
reason to doubt that it is) there could never be a "zero" reading.

Gould 0738 January 7th 04 08:10 AM

Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
 
Posting an answer to something I know nothing about is illogical.

Rick


I don't dispute that- ergo the disclaimer.
But if the depth is measured from the keel and there is a depth indicator on
the sub it will never read zero. Is that somehow incorrect? That was why I
postulated *if* a depth guage read zero at the surface the reading would have
to be from the normally ballasted waterline. Since it apparently does not read
zero, that theory doesn't fly. Freely admitted.

K Smith January 7th 04 11:11 AM

Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacemen
 
Gary Warner wrote:
I've had a few random questions rattling around the

brain for a while - figured I'd pose them there.



When a sub dives to a certain depth, is that depth

measured from the bottom of the sub, the middle,

or the top. In other words, if it dives to 200 feet,

does that mean there is 200 feet of water above

it or that the bottom of it is 200 feet below the

surface?

Depth below the surface, but pass on which part of the boat they
measure from. It's really just a measure of pressure on the hull not
"depth" as such, but the result is the same; unless it's in warm fresh
water:-)


On modern gas car engines and when it's cold

outside, is it still better to let them warm up a

bit and how warm (how long) is necessary?


Modern?? with modern multigrade oils??? A little warmup while you fix
the phone & belt up etc is OK but don't leave it just idling. The best
thing is to get it up to thermostat temp as soon as possible & to do
that it's best making some power (it takes forever if just left idling).
On the other side don't jump in a cold engine & take it to max power,
revs etc, that's not sensible either.




Anyone have a good way to find the total surface

area of my boat hull while it's in the water? It's

a 22' boat, not very deep V, "square" transom. I

did some estimating, but wonder if there are any

creative ways to get more accurate.


From your thread title I think you want the "volume" of the hull below
the water line??? not the area??? Also your question seems to suggest
"while it's in the water"?? you want to work this out without pulling
the boat out??

For the surface area, most of the anitfoul paints, either on the tin or
a pamphlet, have a simple method to work out how much paint you'll need.
But they're not too accurate.

To measure surface area accurately you'll need to measure 1/2 the
bottom of the boat & that part of the sides (if a chine boat) below the
waterline, where ever possible reduce it to oblongs or squares, then
various right triangles when you run out of easy oblongs etc. Add them
all together, double it & that's the total surface area.

In boat design they use a planimeter to run over the lines.

To calculate the "displacement" (volume of the boat below the
waterline) you can actually get a pretty accurate measurement by using
"simpson's formula" even as your question seems to suggest, with the
boat still in the water by;

(i) Boats are usually designed on 10 "sections" i.e. notionally the boat
has 11 transverse stations/bulkheads across it equal distance apart from
the waterline bow. Say a 30 ft WL boat they'd be 3ft apart?? These
stations/bulkheads are not "real", although usually bulkheads are at a
station point, but whatever but you can easily measure with a tape what
the below waterline areas would be, even on a bigger boat.

(ii) You need to measure the "area" of each of those notional
stations/bulkheads, but just that area which is below the waterline.
(again designers with plans drawings etc run around the 1/2 shape X3 div
by 3 to average with a planimeter)

(iii) Once you know the below the waterline only area in sq ft of each
of the boat's 10 notional stations, you multiple each by simpson's
multipliers 1,4,2,4,2,4,2,4,2,4,1 (11 notional below waterline
stations/bulkheads gives 10 equal length sections of the boat)

(iv) Add all the answers together so you now have the sum of functions.

(v) Use simpson's formula to work out the boat or ship's current
displacement per;

2 X 1/3 X sum of functions of 1/2 areas X (inverted scale)sq X the
common interval X 64 = displacement in ponds of salt water, or for fresh
water use 62.2 as the last figure.

This is the formula as used in boat design, so it is a bit more yuk
than you need, all you need is;

(a) 2 is to account for only using 1/2 the below waterline
station/bulkhead area, you can leave it out if you measured the full sq
ft of each area before using his multipliers.

(b) 1/3 is just part of the formula.

(c) Sum of the functions is explained in (iv) above. (but designers
tend to just use 1/2 then multiply by 2 see (a))

(d) Inverted scale squared doesn't bother you because you can use feet
as a direct measure, whereas a designer might be using say 1/2" to the
foot in their drawings. So make sure your notional below the waterline
areas or 1/2 areas if you choose, are in sq ft.

(e) Common interval is the length in feet of each section, again say
it's waterline length of 30 ft the "common interval" is 3.

(f) At this point the formula should have delivered you the boat's
below the waterline volume in cubic feet, the 64 is just the weight in
pounds of a cubic ft of salt water, or 62.2 for fresh water; to give you
the displacement in lbs (weight of the boat).

K




Gary





thunder January 7th 04 12:01 PM

Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
 
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 19:24:30 -0500, Gary Warner wrote:


Anyone have a good way to find the total surface

area of my boat hull while it's in the water? It's

a 22' boat, not very deep V, "square" transom. I

did some estimating, but wonder if there are any

creative ways to get more accurate.


Total area of the boat hull, or just what's in the water i.e. waterplane
area? You could use the pounds per inch immersion formula.

http://dan.pfeiffer.net/boat/ratios.htm#lbsin

Short Wave Sportfishing January 7th 04 12:14 PM

Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
 
On 07 Jan 2004 08:04:48 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Fascinating. What does the depth indicator say when the sub is surfaced?
Obviously it would not be zero.


That would depend on how far it surfaced. Did it blow all ballast or is
it just barely surfaced?

Steve



It can't blow enough ballast to put the keel on the surface. My point is merely
that if the depth is measured between the surface and the keel, (and I have no
reason to doubt that it is) there could never be a "zero" reading.


Think about it - "zero" is the bottom of the boat. If your boat draws
18 inches of water, then your keel is 18 inches below the surface and
thus that is "zero".

Zero is a fictional number anyway and can mean anything.

Later,

Tom
S. Woodstock, CT
----------
"My rod and my reel - they comfort me."

St. Pete, 12 Lb. Test


Short Wave Sportfishing January 7th 04 12:17 PM

Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
 
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 00:20:29 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On 07 Jan 2004 02:52:36 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Fascinating. What does the depth indicator say when the sub is surfaced?
Obviously it would not be zero.


We used to see subs on the surface all the time in eastern Long Island
Sound (sub base at Groton, CT). Only the conning tower and maybe 6
to 8 feet of hull is exposed at most when they are surfaced.
Estimating that the conning tower is submerged by 10 feet at periscope
depth, the height of the tower at 20 feet, plus 8 feet of hull - that
would put you about 38 feet above the periscope depth reading.

If you motor up the Thames River from New London, CT, you can actually
see partially assembled cross sections of subs on dry land. They look
incredibly big, even from a distance. And you really don't want to
take a lot of pictures or try to get closer. :-)


It's even more fun out at The Race when those subs go by - it's quite
a ride when they sneak up on you. I damn near got tossed out of my
Ranger once fishing the rip halfway between Race Rock and LI.

Damn subs. :)

Later,

Tom
S. Woodstock, CT
----------
"My rod and my reel - they comfort me."

St. Pete, 12 Lb. Test


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com