![]() |
Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
|
Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
|
Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
Gould 0738 wrote:
It wouldn't seem logical, otherwise. Posting an answer to something I know nothing about is illogical. Rick |
Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
Fascinating. What does the depth indicator say when the sub is surfaced?
Obviously it would not be zero. That would depend on how far it surfaced. Did it blow all ballast or is it just barely surfaced? Steve It can't blow enough ballast to put the keel on the surface. My point is merely that if the depth is measured between the surface and the keel, (and I have no reason to doubt that it is) there could never be a "zero" reading. |
Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
Posting an answer to something I know nothing about is illogical.
Rick I don't dispute that- ergo the disclaimer. But if the depth is measured from the keel and there is a depth indicator on the sub it will never read zero. Is that somehow incorrect? That was why I postulated *if* a depth guage read zero at the surface the reading would have to be from the normally ballasted waterline. Since it apparently does not read zero, that theory doesn't fly. Freely admitted. |
Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacemen
Gary Warner wrote:
I've had a few random questions rattling around the brain for a while - figured I'd pose them there. When a sub dives to a certain depth, is that depth measured from the bottom of the sub, the middle, or the top. In other words, if it dives to 200 feet, does that mean there is 200 feet of water above it or that the bottom of it is 200 feet below the surface? Depth below the surface, but pass on which part of the boat they measure from. It's really just a measure of pressure on the hull not "depth" as such, but the result is the same; unless it's in warm fresh water:-) On modern gas car engines and when it's cold outside, is it still better to let them warm up a bit and how warm (how long) is necessary? Modern?? with modern multigrade oils??? A little warmup while you fix the phone & belt up etc is OK but don't leave it just idling. The best thing is to get it up to thermostat temp as soon as possible & to do that it's best making some power (it takes forever if just left idling). On the other side don't jump in a cold engine & take it to max power, revs etc, that's not sensible either. Anyone have a good way to find the total surface area of my boat hull while it's in the water? It's a 22' boat, not very deep V, "square" transom. I did some estimating, but wonder if there are any creative ways to get more accurate. From your thread title I think you want the "volume" of the hull below the water line??? not the area??? Also your question seems to suggest "while it's in the water"?? you want to work this out without pulling the boat out?? For the surface area, most of the anitfoul paints, either on the tin or a pamphlet, have a simple method to work out how much paint you'll need. But they're not too accurate. To measure surface area accurately you'll need to measure 1/2 the bottom of the boat & that part of the sides (if a chine boat) below the waterline, where ever possible reduce it to oblongs or squares, then various right triangles when you run out of easy oblongs etc. Add them all together, double it & that's the total surface area. In boat design they use a planimeter to run over the lines. To calculate the "displacement" (volume of the boat below the waterline) you can actually get a pretty accurate measurement by using "simpson's formula" even as your question seems to suggest, with the boat still in the water by; (i) Boats are usually designed on 10 "sections" i.e. notionally the boat has 11 transverse stations/bulkheads across it equal distance apart from the waterline bow. Say a 30 ft WL boat they'd be 3ft apart?? These stations/bulkheads are not "real", although usually bulkheads are at a station point, but whatever but you can easily measure with a tape what the below waterline areas would be, even on a bigger boat. (ii) You need to measure the "area" of each of those notional stations/bulkheads, but just that area which is below the waterline. (again designers with plans drawings etc run around the 1/2 shape X3 div by 3 to average with a planimeter) (iii) Once you know the below the waterline only area in sq ft of each of the boat's 10 notional stations, you multiple each by simpson's multipliers 1,4,2,4,2,4,2,4,2,4,1 (11 notional below waterline stations/bulkheads gives 10 equal length sections of the boat) (iv) Add all the answers together so you now have the sum of functions. (v) Use simpson's formula to work out the boat or ship's current displacement per; 2 X 1/3 X sum of functions of 1/2 areas X (inverted scale)sq X the common interval X 64 = displacement in ponds of salt water, or for fresh water use 62.2 as the last figure. This is the formula as used in boat design, so it is a bit more yuk than you need, all you need is; (a) 2 is to account for only using 1/2 the below waterline station/bulkhead area, you can leave it out if you measured the full sq ft of each area before using his multipliers. (b) 1/3 is just part of the formula. (c) Sum of the functions is explained in (iv) above. (but designers tend to just use 1/2 then multiply by 2 see (a)) (d) Inverted scale squared doesn't bother you because you can use feet as a direct measure, whereas a designer might be using say 1/2" to the foot in their drawings. So make sure your notional below the waterline areas or 1/2 areas if you choose, are in sq ft. (e) Common interval is the length in feet of each section, again say it's waterline length of 30 ft the "common interval" is 3. (f) At this point the formula should have delivered you the boat's below the waterline volume in cubic feet, the 64 is just the weight in pounds of a cubic ft of salt water, or 62.2 for fresh water; to give you the displacement in lbs (weight of the boat). K Gary |
Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 19:24:30 -0500, Gary Warner wrote:
Anyone have a good way to find the total surface area of my boat hull while it's in the water? It's a 22' boat, not very deep V, "square" transom. I did some estimating, but wonder if there are any creative ways to get more accurate. Total area of the boat hull, or just what's in the water i.e. waterplane area? You could use the pounds per inch immersion formula. http://dan.pfeiffer.net/boat/ratios.htm#lbsin |
Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
|
Submarines, Car Engines, and Displacement
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 00:20:29 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On 07 Jan 2004 02:52:36 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote: Fascinating. What does the depth indicator say when the sub is surfaced? Obviously it would not be zero. We used to see subs on the surface all the time in eastern Long Island Sound (sub base at Groton, CT). Only the conning tower and maybe 6 to 8 feet of hull is exposed at most when they are surfaced. Estimating that the conning tower is submerged by 10 feet at periscope depth, the height of the tower at 20 feet, plus 8 feet of hull - that would put you about 38 feet above the periscope depth reading. If you motor up the Thames River from New London, CT, you can actually see partially assembled cross sections of subs on dry land. They look incredibly big, even from a distance. And you really don't want to take a lot of pictures or try to get closer. :-) It's even more fun out at The Race when those subs go by - it's quite a ride when they sneak up on you. I damn near got tossed out of my Ranger once fishing the rip halfway between Race Rock and LI. Damn subs. :) Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ---------- "My rod and my reel - they comfort me." St. Pete, 12 Lb. Test |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com