"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news:1103770958.4f42aaf2bb531d7c58c7431201b27f94@t eranews...
Jack Goff wrote:
"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...

I wouldn't characterize the party as a mindless idiot, but I'm

flabbergasted

that anybody seriously believes Clinton's sex life was a factor in
whether

Al

Qaida attacked us on 9-11.



But Harry is blaming Bush for the 9/11 attacks. I'm flabbergasted that
you
would believe that. Bush had nothing to do with it, but I don't see
your
indignation over Harry's remarks.

Typical two-faced liberal you are, Chuck.

Jack



I know you righties want to give your boy Dubya a pass, but the fact
remains that Bush was captain of the ship on 9-11, and therefore 9-11
happened on his watch and was his responsibility. Perhaps if he had
taken a shorter vacation that summer or had the IQ to pay more attention
to the warnings, he might have done something -anything- to mitigate
what happened in 9-11.

OK, let's run with that. It is a fact that those two planes were flown into
the twin towers while Bush was in office.

By the same logic, the downturn in the economy happened on Clinton's watch.
He was asleep at the wheel, and allowed the stock market to get wildly
overvalued. The crash was inevitable and happened on his watch, but Clinton
did nothing. Bitter pill to swallow, eh?


Bush was asleep at the wheel before, on, and after 9-11. He still is
clueless about fighting terrorism. He thinks the military is the answer.

It is part of the answer. No more attacks here in the US in over three
years is a pretty good record. I suppose we could have pacified them with
free ketchup...

Right, Hanoi Harry?

Jack