"John H" wrote in message
...

A lie is a lie if told knowingly. You, et
al, have no proof that Bush, et al, KNEW that WMD did not exist in
Iraq. We still don't know that it did not exist there. You totally
disregard any evidence that it did exist, just so you can call someone
a liar.


It's a lie if what little evidence there was continues to blow away in the
wind, and the knucklehead keeps repeating the same nonsense, which he DOES.

Here's a question I'd like you to answer, John: If you were George Bush
right now, today, December 31st 2003, could you actually back down from your
WMD stance at this point if, in your heart, you'd realized you were wrong
since the get-go? How would you back down? What would you tell the American
people?

Try not to consider things like "Yeah, but we *did* accomplish this that &
the other thing....", because the creation of a stable Iraq trumps all other
goals, and that job is far from complete.