Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: What a biased comment. Now we have drunken hunters, that tried to execute a scared guy. It was early in the morning, as some were traveling in the dark to the deer stand. They find a guy in the stand who does not belong there and accost him. Whether they fired or not, the scared guy shoots a couple. And from the news report. They radio, probably on FRS radios that one of the people has been shot. Several of the "hunters" are still at the cabin and jump in ATV's to help the shot person. They could have assumed it was a hunting accident. They did not bring their guns along, as they were on a recue mission for an injured person. They left the guns at the cabin. They would still be called hunters, as they were at their property to hunt deer, and you would call them hunters even if they were in camp. And nowhere is there any mention of drunkeness. "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... If the 8 were armed they would have executed him and not the other way around. Matt If the eight were unarmed, how the heck were they "hunting"? Get a bunch of guys staggering around in a beer buzz vs. one sober guy scared for his life. Evens the odds a bit. Then add the factor of some of your buddies getting killed when the intended victim of a cruel "joke" takes the shot seriously and begins firing back. If you aren't prepared to see people going down on both sides of you and you panic as a result, the odds are evened a bit more. All those missing weapons are likely squirreled away in the bushes someplace. How many people go hunting without a gun? Never heard of anybody doing that, except the stereotypical cheating husband. :-) "Don't take you guns to town, son...leave your guns at home." You're posting as if the facts were known here, Bill. All we really know so far is what both sides have said about the tragedy. That's probably all we'll ever know with any certainty, unless there is a genuine confession from one or more of the participants. "Unarmed hunters." What a crock. And if you were still an incompetant reporter, you would still write stories about people and call them hunters, even if they were in the local bar. It is still an extremely biased comment by Mr. Gould. There is no report of drinking, etc. But he has drunken hunters trying to execute a scared guy. Biased to the max, and not data to support any of it! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
( OT ) Bush's 9/11 coverup? | General | |||
OT White House information leak | General | |||
New White Water Lake District Guidebook | UK Paddle |