Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old Nick
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:17:14 -0600, Jeff Starr
vaguely proposed a theory
.......and in reply I say!:

remove ns from my header address to reply via email

So you have NEVER thought or said something similar?

"Why is this being done to me because you are bothered by it and I
can't understand why, when that over there (which bothers me and other
people but not you)is being ignored?"

There is probably a statute against living in that park, and certainly
there would be health issues. There is no statute against paddling on
a lake.

I too wondered what the OP thought he would accomplish bringing in the
homeless to his arguement for the right to kayak. I also felt that it
made him sound petty. One has "nothing" to do with the other and if he
continues to include his rant on the homeless, it will just blur his
arguement for kayaking.


  #2   Report Post  
Peter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Old Nick wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:17:14 -0600, Jeff Starr
vaguely proposed a theory
I too wondered what the OP thought he would accomplish bringing in the
homeless to his arguement for the right to kayak. I also felt that it
made him sound petty. One has "nothing" to do with the other and if he
continues to include his rant on the homeless, it will just blur his
arguement for kayaking.

......and in reply I say!:
So you have NEVER thought or said something similar?

"Why is this being done to me because you are bothered by it and I
can't understand why, when that over there (which bothers me and other
people but not you)is being ignored?"


Regardless of whether one may think such things, it's not an
effective argument for having the rules changed to allow your
activity. And it's likely to distract from the main points you
want to make as well as alienating some people who might
otherwise be your supporters.

Better to first find out what reasons, if any, there are for the
prohibition. Then find ways those concerns can be addressed while
also stressing that paddlesports are a healthy activity that could
benefit families in the community and enhance the usefulness of the
park to the city residents and visitors.

There is probably a statute against living in that park, and certainly
there would be health issues. There is no statute against paddling on
a lake.


If this is a typical city park there are probably rules against
overnight stays and the OP found out there are also rules against
paddling on the lake in that park. Other parks may allow either or
both of these activities. But the issues are separate and should
be dealt with separately.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Anchorage in Miami FL Area anchorlt Cruising 2 June 8th 04 04:37 PM
Ontario Camping Fees akasharkbow General 1 April 25th 04 05:07 PM
Road trip to Miami jake General 0 March 7th 04 03:04 PM
New map cdrom for Southern Ontario Parks Gordon Hamm General 0 September 24th 03 05:43 AM
Over nite parking in WA State parks Steve Cruising 2 August 11th 03 06:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017