Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:30:08 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


JohnH wrote:


BTW: No need to respond Eisboch....we already know you broke the bank on
your wife's gift this year. LOL!


Wait a minute! Are you suggesting that she expects ME to pay for HER boat?

I am heading back to the cave to ponder this one ....


You've been married longer than I have - you mean you still haven't
figured that one out yet?

Even if you don't pay directly, there are indirect payment methods
which will cost you WAY more money, self-esteem and eventually,
sanity. :)

Later,

Tom


Ouch!!!!! gently Tom these are modern times ya know:-)

Maybe Mrs E is just buying a boat??? or hey maybe Richard is paying for
half of the GB??? just as Mrs E paid for half of the Navigator when they
sold the business a few years ago??????

All meant in good fun, please don't over react:-)


K

K. Smith wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:30:08 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


JohnH wrote:


BTW: No need to respond Eisboch....we already know you broke the
bank on your wife's gift this year. LOL!


Wait a minute! Are you suggesting that she expects ME to pay for HER
boat?

I am heading back to the cave to ponder this one ....



You've been married longer than I have - you mean you still haven't
figured that one out yet?

Even if you don't pay directly, there are indirect payment methods
which will cost you WAY more money, self-esteem and eventually,
sanity. :)

Later,

Tom



Ouch!!!!! gently Tom these are modern times ya know:-)

Maybe Mrs E is just buying a boat??? or hey maybe Richard is paying
for half of the GB??? just as Mrs E paid for half of the Navigator when
they sold the business a few years ago??????

All meant in good fun, please don't over react:-)


K

Funny. I don't seem to remember voluntarily paying for half of two
horses. Or even for one whole horse. But, I suppose the mind plays funny
tricks ...

Eisboch

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 06:14:58 -0500, Eisboch wrote:

K. Smith wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:30:08 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


JohnH wrote:


BTW: No need to respond Eisboch....we already know you broke the
bank on your wife's gift this year. LOL!

Wait a minute! Are you suggesting that she expects ME to pay for HER
boat?

I am heading back to the cave to ponder this one ....

You've been married longer than I have - you mean you still haven't
figured that one out yet?

Even if you don't pay directly, there are indirect payment methods
which will cost you WAY more money, self-esteem and eventually,
sanity. :)

Ouch!!!!! gently Tom these are modern times ya know:-)

Maybe Mrs E is just buying a boat??? or hey maybe Richard is paying
for half of the GB??? just as Mrs E paid for half of the Navigator when
they sold the business a few years ago??????

All meant in good fun, please don't over react:-)

Funny. I don't seem to remember voluntarily paying for half of two
horses. Or even for one whole horse. But, I suppose the mind plays funny
tricks ...

The key word in voluntarily.

Later,

Tom

Eisboch wrote:
K. Smith wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:30:08 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


JohnH wrote:


BTW: No need to respond Eisboch....we already know you broke the
bank on your wife's gift this year. LOL!


Wait a minute! Are you suggesting that she expects ME to pay for
HER boat?

I am heading back to the cave to ponder this one ....




You've been married longer than I have - you mean you still haven't
figured that one out yet?

Even if you don't pay directly, there are indirect payment methods
which will cost you WAY more money, self-esteem and eventually,
sanity. :)

Later,

Tom




Ouch!!!!! gently Tom these are modern times ya know:-)

Maybe Mrs E is just buying a boat??? or hey maybe Richard is
paying for half of the GB??? just as Mrs E paid for half of the
Navigator when they sold the business a few years ago??????

All meant in good fun, please don't over react:-)


K


Funny. I don't seem to remember voluntarily paying for half of two
horses. Or even for one whole horse. But, I suppose the mind plays funny
tricks ...

Eisboch

Come of Mr E you remember her paying for half of your toys don't
you???? Did you "ask" her permission first?? of course not why
would/should you, just as why would/should she:-)

We better stop this now before it gets all scary bananas, as I said it
was just an in fun dig at Tom & he seems to have survived OK:-) Breath
in, hold.... now out slowly:-)

K

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:29:30 +1100, "K. Smith"
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:30:08 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


JohnH wrote:


BTW: No need to respond Eisboch....we already know you broke the bank on
your wife's gift this year. LOL!


Wait a minute! Are you suggesting that she expects ME to pay for HER boat?

I am heading back to the cave to ponder this one ....


You've been married longer than I have - you mean you still haven't
figured that one out yet?

Even if you don't pay directly, there are indirect payment methods
which will cost you WAY more money, self-esteem and eventually,
sanity. :)


Ouch!!!!! gently Tom these are modern times ya know:-)

Kaern my dear - there are some things that transcend time. This is
one of them. :)

Maybe Mrs E is just buying a boat??? or hey maybe Richard is paying for
half of the GB??? just as Mrs E paid for half of the Navigator when they
sold the business a few years ago??????

Actually, Mrs. E is doing something that my wife has actually
considered, but she suffers from motion sickness and has a weird
peripheral vision deal that limits her participation in boating.

She claims that a bigger boat would solve that problem. Her version
of a larger boat is basically a floating ranch house.

We'll see - she has a two years to go. :)

All meant in good fun, please don't over react:-)

Understood.


Live long and prosper,

Tom

Careful Tom... now that Harry & Chuck ignore her, she's desperate to find
someone new to stalk. :-)

Careful Tom... now that Harry & Chuck ignore her, she's desperate to find
someone new to stalk. :-)

Karen deserves some credit for being the most "reformed" poster on this forum
this year.

She has been very hard on a few people in the past, but judge her in the
present as she behaves in the present rather than by her worst moments
previous.