Is this where we are heading? Fear of showing a classy movie that
depicts the doggedness and bravery of our soldiers during World War II?

Its obvious. They could show that movie, its been on TV before. And it could
have been edited for television easily.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
A tight-wing
organization, the Family Research Council, said its members were
prepared to send in thousands of complaints.

Those damn tight-wingers!

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
A tight-wing
organization, the Family Research Council, said its members were
prepared to send in thousands of complaints.

Those damn tight-wingers!



You knew that is where this was headed from the first post.

In article ,
says...

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
A tight-wing
organization, the Family Research Council, said its members were
prepared to send in thousands of complaints.

Those damn tight-wingers!



You knew that is where this was headed from the first post.

Isn't it just so coincidental that the ABC affiliates owned by the scum
sucking right winger who wanted to air the anti-Kerry propaganda will
not be showing the film.

They don't want to do anything to hasten people's realization that Bush
got us in a stupid war and the result is a lot of kids and men dying for
little if any reason.

I like Molly Ivin's analogy. She said that to get a dog to stop
killin' chickens you hang the dead chicken around the dog's neck until
it putrefies down to the last morsel. The dog doesn't kill chickens
anymore.

Bush is going to putrefy around our necks until we can't stand the
smell.

jps

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 20:51:22 -0800, jps wrote:

In article ,
says...

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
A tight-wing
organization, the Family Research Council, said its members were
prepared to send in thousands of complaints.

Those damn tight-wingers!



You knew that is where this was headed from the first post.

Isn't it just so coincidental that the ABC affiliates owned by the scum
sucking right winger who wanted to air the anti-Kerry propaganda will
not be showing the film.

They don't want to do anything to hasten people's realization that Bush
got us in a stupid war and the result is a lot of kids and men dying for
little if any reason.

I like Molly Ivin's analogy. She said that to get a dog to stop
killin' chickens you hang the dead chicken around the dog's neck until
it putrefies down to the last morsel. The dog doesn't kill chickens
anymore.

Bush is going to putrefy around our necks until we can't stand the
smell.

jps

Cry a river, build a bridge, and get over it.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

In article , PocoLoco415
@hotmail.com says...
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 20:51:22 -0800, jps wrote:

In article ,
says...

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
A tight-wing
organization, the Family Research Council, said its members were
prepared to send in thousands of complaints.

Those damn tight-wingers!



You knew that is where this was headed from the first post.

Isn't it just so coincidental that the ABC affiliates owned by the scum
sucking right winger who wanted to air the anti-Kerry propaganda will
not be showing the film.

They don't want to do anything to hasten people's realization that Bush
got us in a stupid war and the result is a lot of kids and men dying for
little if any reason.

I like Molly Ivin's analogy. She said that to get a dog to stop
killin' chickens you hang the dead chicken around the dog's neck until
it putrefies down to the last morsel. The dog doesn't kill chickens
anymore.

Bush is going to putrefy around our necks until we can't stand the
smell.

jps

Cry a river, build a bridge, and get over it.

No thanks.

Harry Krause wrote:


"Saving Private Ryan," staring Oscar-winning actor Tom Hanks, will
not be shown on the ABC affiliates in Alabama, Georgia, Iowa,
Massachusetts, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina and West Virginia.


Well, so much for red state/blue state moral division.

Eisboch

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:06:31 -0500, Eisboch
wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:


"Saving Private Ryan," staring Oscar-winning actor Tom Hanks, will
not be shown on the ABC affiliates in Alabama, Georgia, Iowa,
Massachusetts, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina and West Virginia.

Well, so much for red state/blue state moral division.

Does it interest anybody that the one state on that list which could
be called the ultimate liberal haven isn't broadcasting the movie?

Later,

Tom

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:29:14 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:06:31 -0500, Eisboch
wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:


"Saving Private Ryan," staring Oscar-winning actor Tom Hanks, will
not be shown on the ABC affiliates in Alabama, Georgia, Iowa,
Massachusetts, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina and West Virginia.

Well, so much for red state/blue state moral division.

Does it interest anybody that the one state on that list which could
be called the ultimate liberal haven isn't broadcasting the movie?

Later,

Tom

Yeah, but which counties are involved? That would be the telling
aspect of the situation.
John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:14:18 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:29:14 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:06:31 -0500, Eisboch
wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

"Saving Private Ryan," staring Oscar-winning actor Tom Hanks, will
not be shown on the ABC affiliates in Alabama, Georgia, Iowa,
Massachusetts, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina and West Virginia.

Well, so much for red state/blue state moral division.

Does it interest anybody that the one state on that list which could
be called the ultimate liberal haven isn't broadcasting the movie?

Yeah, but which counties are involved? That would be the telling
aspect of the situation.

It was the Boston Affiliate. :)

Guess that Puritan ethic is still alive huh?

Live long and prosper,

Tom