![]() |
This really is bizarre...
Is this where we are heading? Fear of showing a classy movie that
depicts the doggedness and bravery of our soldiers during World War II? Its obvious. They could show that movie, its been on TV before. And it could have been edited for television easily. |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... A tight-wing organization, the Family Research Council, said its members were prepared to send in thousands of complaints. Those damn tight-wingers! |
"NOYB" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... A tight-wing organization, the Family Research Council, said its members were prepared to send in thousands of complaints. Those damn tight-wingers! You knew that is where this was headed from the first post. |
|
Harry Krause wrote:
"Saving Private Ryan," staring Oscar-winning actor Tom Hanks, will not be shown on the ABC affiliates in Alabama, Georgia, Iowa, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina and West Virginia. Well, so much for red state/blue state moral division. Eisboch |
Harry Krause wrote:
CCred68046 wrote: Is this where we are heading? Fear of showing a classy movie that depicts the doggedness and bravery of our soldiers during World War II? Its obvious. They could show that movie, its been on TV before. And it could have been edited for television easily. I remember the movie well. I saw it in the theaters and I recall seeing it on HBO, I believe. There's no reason to "edit" it for television, and I believe ABC's deal with the studio forbids deletions. What would you edit? The "cuss words"? They are integral to the movie. The movie is violent, but no more so than other movies on television. There's something else going on here. Ah, come on Harry, get a hold of yourself. You are starting to sound like the mentality of the 50's when everything unexplainable must be a commie plot. Television is still over-reacting to the boob show at the Superbowl. Eisboch (back to watching the "Girls gone Wild" infomercial) |
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:16:19 -0500, Eisboch
wrote: Harry Krause wrote: CCred68046 wrote: Is this where we are heading? Fear of showing a classy movie that depicts the doggedness and bravery of our soldiers during World War II? Its obvious. They could show that movie, its been on TV before. And it could have been edited for television easily. I remember the movie well. I saw it in the theaters and I recall seeing it on HBO, I believe. There's no reason to "edit" it for television, and I believe ABC's deal with the studio forbids deletions. What would you edit? The "cuss words"? They are integral to the movie. The movie is violent, but no more so than other movies on television. There's something else going on here. Ah, come on Harry, get a hold of yourself. You are starting to sound like the mentality of the 50's when everything unexplainable must be a commie plot. Both of the sides, left and right, are acting like the old Rockfeller, Tri-lateralist, Illumaniti, Lyndon LaRouche, Black Jesuit, MasonKnight, conspiracists. The "secret" societies of the Roman Catholic Church. Remember those? :) You and I must think alike. By the way, I've never seen the movie. Haven't seen "Deer Hunter", "Apocalypse Now", "Platoon", "Full Metal Jacket" either. Now that I think about it, I haven't seen a movie since "Pirates of the Caribbean". Television is still over-reacting to the boob show at the Superbowl. Michael Powell was a Clinton appointee you know. He was put in place to clean up the FCC's act - Al Gore's favorite go-to Commission of how reformed government should look. Look where it got them - single source news, the new morality in broadcast standards and now this - broadcasters afraid to broadcast movies. You just can't make this up. Eisboch (back to watching the "Girls gone Wild" infomercial) Has nothing on the "Women In Chains, Part II" infomercial. Hubba hubba..... :) Later, Tom |
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:06:31 -0500, Eisboch
wrote: Harry Krause wrote: "Saving Private Ryan," staring Oscar-winning actor Tom Hanks, will not be shown on the ABC affiliates in Alabama, Georgia, Iowa, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina and West Virginia. Well, so much for red state/blue state moral division. Does it interest anybody that the one state on that list which could be called the ultimate liberal haven isn't broadcasting the movie? Later, Tom |
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:33:11 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: CCred68046 wrote: Is this where we are heading? Fear of showing a classy movie that depicts the doggedness and bravery of our soldiers during World War II? Its obvious. They could show that movie, its been on TV before. And it could have been edited for television easily. I remember the movie well. I saw it in the theaters and I recall seeing it on HBO, I believe. There's no reason to "edit" it for television, and I believe ABC's deal with the studio forbids deletions. What would you edit? The "cuss words"? They are integral to the movie. The movie is violent, but no more so than other movies on television. There's something else going on here. Cuss words...integral? Give us a break! John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com