Is this where we are heading? Fear of showing a classy movie that
depicts the doggedness and bravery of our soldiers during World War II?

Its obvious. They could show that movie, its been on TV before. And it could
have been edited for television easily.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
A tight-wing
organization, the Family Research Council, said its members were
prepared to send in thousands of complaints.

Those damn tight-wingers!

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
A tight-wing
organization, the Family Research Council, said its members were
prepared to send in thousands of complaints.

Those damn tight-wingers!



You knew that is where this was headed from the first post.

In article ,
says...

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
A tight-wing
organization, the Family Research Council, said its members were
prepared to send in thousands of complaints.

Those damn tight-wingers!



You knew that is where this was headed from the first post.

Isn't it just so coincidental that the ABC affiliates owned by the scum
sucking right winger who wanted to air the anti-Kerry propaganda will
not be showing the film.

They don't want to do anything to hasten people's realization that Bush
got us in a stupid war and the result is a lot of kids and men dying for
little if any reason.

I like Molly Ivin's analogy. She said that to get a dog to stop
killin' chickens you hang the dead chicken around the dog's neck until
it putrefies down to the last morsel. The dog doesn't kill chickens
anymore.

Bush is going to putrefy around our necks until we can't stand the
smell.

jps

Harry Krause wrote:


"Saving Private Ryan," staring Oscar-winning actor Tom Hanks, will
not be shown on the ABC affiliates in Alabama, Georgia, Iowa,
Massachusetts, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina and West Virginia.


Well, so much for red state/blue state moral division.

Eisboch

Harry Krause wrote:
CCred68046 wrote:

Is this where we are heading? Fear of showing a classy movie that
depicts the doggedness and bravery of our soldiers during World War II?

Its obvious. They could show that movie, its been on TV before. And it could
have been edited for television easily.



I remember the movie well. I saw it in the theaters and I recall seeing
it on HBO, I believe. There's no reason to "edit" it for television, and
I believe ABC's deal with the studio forbids deletions.

What would you edit? The "cuss words"? They are integral to the movie.
The movie is violent, but no more so than other movies on television.

There's something else going on here.

Ah, come on Harry, get a hold of yourself. You are starting to sound
like the mentality of the 50's when everything unexplainable must be a
commie plot. Television is still over-reacting to the boob show at the
Superbowl.

Eisboch (back to watching the "Girls gone Wild" infomercial)

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:16:19 -0500, Eisboch
wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:
CCred68046 wrote:

Is this where we are heading? Fear of showing a classy movie that
depicts the doggedness and bravery of our soldiers during World War II?

Its obvious. They could show that movie, its been on TV before. And it could
have been edited for television easily.

I remember the movie well. I saw it in the theaters and I recall seeing
it on HBO, I believe. There's no reason to "edit" it for television, and
I believe ABC's deal with the studio forbids deletions.

What would you edit? The "cuss words"? They are integral to the movie.
The movie is violent, but no more so than other movies on television.

There's something else going on here.

Ah, come on Harry, get a hold of yourself. You are starting to sound
like the mentality of the 50's when everything unexplainable must be a
commie plot.

Both of the sides, left and right, are acting like the old Rockfeller,
Tri-lateralist, Illumaniti, Lyndon LaRouche, Black Jesuit,
MasonKnight, conspiracists. The "secret" societies of the Roman
Catholic Church. Remember those? :)

You and I must think alike.

By the way, I've never seen the movie. Haven't seen "Deer Hunter",
"Apocalypse Now", "Platoon", "Full Metal Jacket" either.

Now that I think about it, I haven't seen a movie since "Pirates of
the Caribbean".

Television is still over-reacting to the boob show at the
Superbowl.

Michael Powell was a Clinton appointee you know. He was put in place
to clean up the FCC's act - Al Gore's favorite go-to Commission of how
reformed government should look.

Look where it got them - single source news, the new morality in
broadcast standards and now this - broadcasters afraid to broadcast
movies.

You just can't make this up.

Eisboch (back to watching the "Girls gone Wild" infomercial)

Has nothing on the "Women In Chains, Part II" infomercial.

Hubba hubba..... :)

Later,

Tom

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:06:31 -0500, Eisboch
wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:


"Saving Private Ryan," staring Oscar-winning actor Tom Hanks, will
not be shown on the ABC affiliates in Alabama, Georgia, Iowa,
Massachusetts, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina and West Virginia.

Well, so much for red state/blue state moral division.

Does it interest anybody that the one state on that list which could
be called the ultimate liberal haven isn't broadcasting the movie?

Later,

Tom

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:33:11 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

CCred68046 wrote:
Is this where we are heading? Fear of showing a classy movie that
depicts the doggedness and bravery of our soldiers during World War II?

Its obvious. They could show that movie, its been on TV before. And it could
have been edited for television easily.


I remember the movie well. I saw it in the theaters and I recall seeing
it on HBO, I believe. There's no reason to "edit" it for television, and
I believe ABC's deal with the studio forbids deletions.

What would you edit? The "cuss words"? They are integral to the movie.
The movie is violent, but no more so than other movies on television.

There's something else going on here.

Cuss words...integral? Give us a break!

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 20:51:22 -0800, jps wrote:

In article ,
says...

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
A tight-wing
organization, the Family Research Council, said its members were
prepared to send in thousands of complaints.

Those damn tight-wingers!



You knew that is where this was headed from the first post.

Isn't it just so coincidental that the ABC affiliates owned by the scum
sucking right winger who wanted to air the anti-Kerry propaganda will
not be showing the film.

They don't want to do anything to hasten people's realization that Bush
got us in a stupid war and the result is a lot of kids and men dying for
little if any reason.

I like Molly Ivin's analogy. She said that to get a dog to stop
killin' chickens you hang the dead chicken around the dog's neck until
it putrefies down to the last morsel. The dog doesn't kill chickens
anymore.

Bush is going to putrefy around our necks until we can't stand the
smell.

jps

Cry a river, build a bridge, and get over it.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!